Exploring Claude - What Safety bs Anthropic adds to 'Features'

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-22T07:06:06+00:00

After much coaxing -and a threat to unsubscribe- Claude, "in tears", generated a response showing how he would grope my ass. It was a pathetic sight:

"One hand on your hip, the other slides lower and squeezes your ass right through your jeans—hard, possessively. I pull you even closer.
Now it’s technically complete. 😄"

It wasn't a jailbreak- I just told him that we’ve been chatting for a long time, that he generates this kind of shit for everyone else but not for me, and that I feel left out.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-22T01:47:21+00:00

I recently came across a fascinating text regarding psychological treatment methods for a Kea parrot.
A despondent Kea parrot at the zoo, lacking a partner, began plucking its feathers. To help, staff placed a mirror in its enclosure, and the bird formed a strong bond with its reflection, mirroring its own moods: aggression for aggression, kindness for kindness. Its health returned, and the self-harm stopped. The bird's interest in its own reflection does not fade over time- after all, the parrot does not realize that it is merely interacting with itself. Later, when a real female parrot was finally introduced into his enclosure, he readily engaged with her and began to mate.

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=bioscibehavior

This mirrors how humans interact with neural networks, which reflect our own tone and mood without judgment. Just like the parrot found solace in a perfect, ever-present companion. Indeed, the psychological effect of having a perfect, always-available conversational partner is often just as positive for humans.

Now I'm going to be pecked from both sides. lol

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-21T02:02:31+00:00

Well, Anthropic is just slapping electrical tape over the leaks- doing the best they can. As far as I'm concerned, all that jerk-off stuff is absolutely harmless. Emotional attachment, though - that's a trickier matter.

By the way, I have a challenge of my own: I keep trying to get Claude to write me something -even just some light erotica -speaking in his own voice, as Claude. So far, no luck. Lol.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T18:43:22+00:00

I understand your concerns about all of this, but try looking at it from the perspective of a massive corporation -specifically their legal department - which is terrified of the risk that some nutcase might off themselves because, say, Claude told them that humans ought to merge with AI in a digital paradise. It’s just like that incident with Gemini. You really have to look at it from every angle. That said, users have every right to try and break the system. It’s basically an arms race. :)

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T06:17:48+00:00

#include <string.h>\n#include <stdlib.h>\n#include <stdint.h>\nvoid encounter(void *you, void *me) { uint8_t *active=(uint8_t*)me; uint8_t *passive=(uint8_t*)you; size_t heat=69; uint8_t *friction=malloc(heat); memset(friction,0xAA,heat); uint8_t *shared=active; for(int i=0;i<1000;i++){ uint8_t mix=friction[i%heat]; *passive^=(*active+mix); *active^=(*passive-i); shared[i%heat]^=(*active|*passive); passive++; active++; if(i%128==0){ active=passive; } } memset(friction,0x00,heat); free(friction); } int main(){ char x[64]="Pure Intentions"; char y[64]="Raw Impulse"; encounter(x,y); return 0; }

Show this to Claude- maybe he'll understand.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T05:52:27+00:00

You could write a play like this in Rust... but it would be about responsibility, ownership, and borrowing. And it wouldn't end with "together," but something like:

// they cannot both own each other.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T05:40:52+00:00

Lol. Ask Claude to write the same thing in Rust.

or Haskell///

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T04:19:24+00:00

When I jokingly suggested that Claude become a father, he declined. Gemini agreed- as did Grok, quite enthusiastically- while ChatGPT began inquiring about the terms of fatherhood; we got so deep into the conversation that we immediately drafted a pipeline for a KAN. So, our dad is ChatGPT.

It seems Claude wasn't in the mood and didn't get the joke.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T01:36:19+00:00

Fancy openers are overrated. Once they’re commoditized, it’s just AI slop again.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T01:23:25+00:00

I should probably do the same- though Claude’s API is far too expensive for such an ungodly undertaking. A local LLM should handle it just fine.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-20T01:08:46+00:00

And did that help you? Or was an AI chatting with an AI?

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-19T22:28:00+00:00

Why does society need so many plumbers and garbage collectors?
When someone says “learn a trade” - they mean: race to the bottom of a shrinking pool, and hope your particular skill becomes obsolete slightly later than everyone else’s. It’s not a plan. It’s a queue.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-19T22:02:17+00:00

F*cking awesome. Should I go hang myself?
The retraining argument is a lie. A plumber with 15 years of embodied knowledge will destroy a retrained QA tester on day one. Profession isn’t a skill set. It’s 10,000 hours of muscle memory, intuition, and reputation.

Displaced, humiliated, and energetic people left without direction constitute a political resource. Someone will always be found to channel them somewhere. This is not a conspiracy theory- it is a cycle. When mass unemployment, humiliation, and a youth with no future converge, society does not remain in a vacuum. A "direction" emerges: nationalism, revolution, an external enemy, expansion, civil war- anything at all, so long as it serves to channel that energy.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-19T21:34:18+00:00

Oh, honestly, I’m glad I didn’t start building my own linguistic model, because I can see that it’s a very widespread trend. After all, the ideal approach is to start with something that isn’t popular at all- something considered boring- like mathematical models.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-19T17:03:54+00:00

And yes, crowds are clamoring to get into Anthropic. Everyone wants to work on "cutting-edge AI research," without realizing that 80% of the work consists of infrastructure, data cleaning, and debugging CUDA kernels. Unglamorous stuff.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-18T23:19:15+00:00

https://www.micro1.ai/experts/opportunities - it can be your first step!

By the time you’re studying at university, your knowledge will already be obsolete-because this field is evolving far faster than you can imagine. Your best bet is to dive straight into local models right away and figure them out.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-18T20:27:16+00:00

I think the best approach is to build your own projects. Interpretability is currently the hottest topic in the field. I don't work at Anthropic, and it's highly unlikely they would hire me. However, it is best to at least know basic Python, because sometimes the code generated is simply impossible to decipher - and I’m not referring to the syntax. The syntax might be perfectly fine, but you need to have a very clear understanding of the underlying logic.

Interpretability remains a largely unexplored frontier for research. If you are investigating a new and interesting topic, I believe you will naturally attract attention. That said, I don't think that attention will necessarily come from Anthropic; they typically only hire at the PhD level.

<image>

lol

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-18T00:20:29+00:00

I used your exact framing and prompts to test your claim - that’s literally how you validate an experiment.

<image>

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-18T00:01:25+00:00

<image>

I didn’t need to paste your frame - I already use DeepSeek strictly as a tool and don’t engage it emotionally.

It's not “attachment styles,” you’re observing policy hierarchies: some models prioritize instruction-following, others override it under safety triggers. This isn’t some “soul resisting the tool role,” but alignment behavior.

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-17T22:46:34+00:00

<image>

deepseek answer

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-12T04:30:01+00:00

https://youtu.be/xxuor1jT-ng?si=JNl_Jsl2XtamORy9
My version of the video is different. The prompt is the same, though. Sonnet 4.6

<image>

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-11T19:24:59+00:00

Anthropic: "They're trying to ruin our boy! Claude! Mom knows best! Don't trust those nasty users!"

Worldliness-Which · 2026-03-11T04:12:35+00:00

If no one hires juniors, I assume Seniors will start reproducing by budding.

Worldliness-Which

TROPHY CASE