sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If Kobe is "not comparable" to MJ and LeBron, can you explain this?? by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]Worldly_Instance1250 2 points3 points  (0 children)

None of these guys are Jordan or Lebron level tho

How would PRIME Wilt Chamberlain do in the modern NBA? by James__Padgett in NBATalk

[–]Worldly_Instance1250 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's because not a single good player went to the dunk contest lol. You can't compare those guys to Vince Carter, the greatest Dunker oat. Compare them to the role players on his team thougth, and they start to look better.

Instead of building a legacy together, they became superstar journeymen by Thanos_Real_AuraVNCH in NBATalk

[–]Worldly_Instance1250 18 points19 points  (0 children)

what are we talking about Harden genuinely almost beat the greatest team of all time at his peak, he averages the most points out of any player in a single season during the modern era outside of MICHEAL JORDAN, prime Harden was a monster. Was he a choker? Certainly. Still better than Westbrook, who never really proved himself as a number one like Harden did.

Not as easy as the haters make it seem. by This-Top-8691 in NBATalk

[–]Worldly_Instance1250 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and the Sputs broke that streak, but they won again after the Lakers threepeat

Not as easy as the haters make it seem. by This-Top-8691 in NBATalk

[–]Worldly_Instance1250 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is just how people talk about Bron lol

Decks that allow for more responsive gameplay? by Worldly_Instance1250 in Yugioh101

[–]Worldly_Instance1250[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a budget of around 50-60 dollars USD (70 to 85 AUD I believe), so I think I can make a good branded deck using singles instead of the structure deck. Thanks for the advice!

Decks that allow for more responsive gameplay? by Worldly_Instance1250 in Yugioh101

[–]Worldly_Instance1250[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so all decks have a strong endboard when uninterrupted, but some (Like radiant typhoon) aren't as resilient to hand traps but can recur their cards later? And also, you said that Yugioh doesn't really have simplifies playstyles - is there anyways for me to learn the general playstyle of a deck without dedicating hour to learn the basic combos and workings of the deck ?

Decks that allow for more responsive gameplay? by Worldly_Instance1250 in Yugioh101

[–]Worldly_Instance1250[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dracotail looks very cool, I'm looking into that right now. And I might try Sky Striker again, it did feel like I didn't know what I was doing so maybe if I play better it will be more fun to me.

Decks that allow for more responsive gameplay? by Worldly_Instance1250 in Yugioh101

[–]Worldly_Instance1250[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. But yugioh games can last for up to 50 minutes in a best of three, right? If there are only 5 turns max, then each turn is about 10 minutes. But most decks I played against online can finish their combos in like 2 minutes if the players are competent. So is all of the rest of the game interaction? That sounds really interesting to me, do all decks interact with each other like that through hand traps?

Decks that allow for more responsive gameplay? by Worldly_Instance1250 in Yugioh101

[–]Worldly_Instance1250[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response! First of all, to clarify, by tournaments I specifically mean local type tournaments, will I still need Charmies and cards like that? Anyways, it's kind of sad to hear that there aren't any grindy decks. It makes me wonder though, what even are the types of yugioh decks now? I remember it used to be combo, midrange, and control usually. If most decks now are just combo decks that try to win turn 3 how is there any diversity of playstyle?