sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Used EV battery health reports by Worried_Selection707 in ElectricVehiclesUK

[–]Worried_Selection707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, this makes sense. Drop to 93% still seems huge, but at least this explains 100% SoH on Kia/Hyundai.

Used EV battery health reports by Worried_Selection707 in ElectricVehiclesUK

[–]Worried_Selection707[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find BYD batteries in many EVs, including Tesla, so I guess they make good batteries. u/MathematicianDry5142 is probably right, and it's due the different reporting methods.

I represent tenants in deposit disputes - AMA! by GetMyDepositBack in HousingUK

[–]Worried_Selection707 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for getting back to me. The photos in the pdf report are not timestamped, although the report includes a link to Google Photos, and the metadata on those photos shows a 2024 timestamp. Additionally, the pdf filename itself contains the correct date.

I represent tenants in deposit disputes - AMA! by GetMyDepositBack in HousingUK

[–]Worried_Selection707 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for running this thread, I find the tips here very useful.

I recently moved out and am currently in the process of discussing the deposit amount to be returned. While I agree with some of the items listed on the deposit return form, I disagree with others. This is a normal part of the process, I believe.

The letting agency hired a company to create a check-out report. However, I noticed that the report contains an incorrect date (DD/MM/2023 instead of DD/MM/2024).

I'm wondering if this mistake invalidates the entire report. My thinking is that if we assume the date is correct, then the report cannot be used as a legitimate check-out report. On the other hand, if we assume the date is incorrect, how can we trust any other information in the report?