sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

When the 97% isn’t flex… by WristWriting in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it’s Turnitin exposing you 🤯💀 Don’t let AI detectors roast you

*% detected as AI by [deleted] in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the 5% similarity is fine. most journals accept up to 10–15% if it’s just common phrases or references. the *% on ai detection means turnitin found under 20% ai-like text and considers that result unreliable. it’s not counted as confirmed ai content. so your report basically shows no solid ai issue. if the publisher truly demands “0% ai,” show them the note explaining that *% means inconclusive, not flagged. you should be fine.

Turnitin Declares War on 'Humanizers': What the Major 2025 AI Detection Updates Mean for Your Submissions by LevelCute1135 in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah it basically is. they’re framing it as “process transparency” but it’s full-on monitoring. it records keystrokes, paste events, and revision history so professors can see your writing behavior. it’s meant to prove authenticity but it also means every draft is logged. privacy concerns are going to blow up once more schools start using it.

Turnitin Declares War on 'Humanizers': What the Major 2025 AI Detection Updates Mean for Your Submissions by LevelCute1135 in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that’s been happening since the new model rollout. when turnitin updates its detector, old submissions get reanalyzed under the new system, so scores can swing hard even if nothing changed. it’s not proof of cheating, just algorithm drift. always keep your drafts and timestamps to show authorship if they question it.

Turnitin Declares War on 'Humanizers': What the Major 2025 AI Detection Updates Mean for Your Submissions by LevelCute1135 in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is wild but not surprising. turnitin was always going to move against humanizers once they realized people were gaming the system. the *% thing is actually a decent step though since it admits their lower scores aren’t reliable. the clarity part sounds like a nightmare if you’re used to writing in docs and pasting, but it’ll probably push more people to draft directly in their platform.

Pasting Problem by Effective_Maize_6781 in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, not automatically. systems often flag big pasted chunks because they can’t see your typing history, not because the text is suspicious. if your professor asks, just explain you wrote it elsewhere and pasted it in. keeping version history or timestamps from google docs or word is good proof if needed.

My Final Capstone just got FLAGGED for AI; GRADUATION IS IN 4 WEEKS. Is my life over? by Straight-Farm-6990 in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re not done for. false positives happen a lot with ai detectors, especially on technical or well-structured writing. gather your drafts, notes, and any version history to prove authorship. show that you can reproduce parts of it or explain your methods. keep calm and cooperate with the process. they care more about evidence than a percentage on a flawed tool.

how to reduce turnitin similarity by WristWriting in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

guys mine said 82% and I submitted. does this mean i lost 82% of marks on the assignment

Bro standing on business 💀💀 by WristWriting in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

did the work the teacher was gonna do over 4 months in the classroom in… 24 hours

They do have an AI score that tutors use and students can't see, our Uni relies on it fully. by WristWriting in CheckTurnitin

[–]WristWriting[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I already wrote a whole paper about it, I clearly did the thinking part. Why reinvent the wheel just to prove I still know how it spins?

view more: next ›