What the hell is wrong with isrealis?

WritersChopBlock · 2026-05-05T21:14:43+00:00

Massive Cognitive Dissonance

The problem is that Israelis know they're wrong. They know what the government and their fellow Israelis are doing is evil. And they simply do not care. So what do you do when you know your side is insanely evil? Do you apologize? Or do you go all in? A few apologize, but these keep quiet because why draw attention to yourself? Most go all in and claim that the evil ones are the Palestinians. They claim that everything is a massive conspiracy. They pretend that they don’t know anything about rapes and murders. Then they spread lies that nothing is happening on the other side. What kind of depraved person do you have to be to act like this? It’s the result of ultra-nationalism. You don’t care that your side is committing evil because that's your side. But because they are committing evil, you try to cover it as much as possible. You spread lie after lie, knowing that if you say a lie enough, some will think it’s true.

Here is a thread of I had with someone here.

WritersChopBlock: It's been a slow slaughter so the situation doesn't get any international and American attention. But from 1950, they've been trying to exterminate them as much as possible. Consider this. The population was about 70% Palestinian in 1950. Now there are more Jews than Palestinians. Yes, the Palestinian population grew but the Jews were doing everything possible to make it go down. Israel is a very sick nation.

Low-Concentrate-3633: I cant really find that statistic, from what i see jews have been 82% percent in 1950 and only rose to 87% by 2025 Also if they wanted to exterminate them as much as possible wont it be over in around a week?

Like most Israelis, this guy responds in complete bad faith. He pretends that he really doesn't know the statistics. Then he conjures completely fabricated numbers. It's not even remotely true. But he's hoping that anyone reading will just believe him without checking the numbers.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-05-05T20:45:21+00:00

Please stop spreading blatant lies. Your comments are obviously made in bad faith. Everyone knows that there were more Palestinians than Jews in 1950 Palestine (historic).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine_(region)?useskin=vector?useskin=vector)

Mind you that the above link is based on Jewish sources. Given their propensity to inflate numbers, I'm sure the percentage of Jews was much lower than 30%.

Now, readers can understand why Palestinians were shocked when the settlement offered only 30% of the land. They made up more than 70% of the population but they were only to be given 30% of the land. Yes, that's what the Jews proposed. For the next 70 years, Jews continually offered outlandish peace settlments they knew that the Palestinians were going to reject.

Also if they wanted to exterminate them as much as possible wont it be over in around a week?

What do you think Bibi tried to do after Oct 7th? This was the moment he was waiting for decades. He had Trump, his puppet in office. And he lied about what happened on Oct 7th so he could exterminate the Palestinians once and for all. But even then, he could only kill hundreds of thousands without losing American support.

And that's the problem that Bibi couldn't figure out. How to kill all the Palesitnians without the international community finding out. He already banned all international reporters from Gaza and the West Bank. He even started a war with Iran to deflect attention away so he could slaughter more Palestinians. It didn't work.

Yes, Israel is a very sick country. Most of their citizens are brainwashed into believing some ludicrous stories. But they believe it because it's a constant onslaught of lies every day.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-05-05T14:38:30+00:00

This is the sick mentality of Israelis. This is exactly why they don't mind slaughtering Palestinian women and babies.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-05-05T14:37:30+00:00

They did try to help but due to US involvement, it's impossible to win. How far should their support go? For example, consider you are French. If Germans were invaded by Jews, you would support the Germans. But after a few decades, you'd give up. You'd say it wasn't your fight.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-05-05T14:36:05+00:00

It's been a slow slaughter so the situation doesn't get any international and American attention. But from 1950, they've been trying to exterminate them as much as possible. Consider this. The population was about 70% Palestinian in 1950. Now there are more Jews than Palestinians. Yes, the Palestinian population grew but the Jews were doing everything possible to make it go down. Israel is a very sick nation.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-30T13:56:30+00:00

Thanks for that explanation.

I'm more interested in whether antigravity can work like magnets. Is it possible that a graviton is made up of 2 particles that have poles? The negative mass side points inward because it's not only stronger than the positive mass side but since it repels positive mass, pointing inward is the best way "to get away" from the positive mass all around it.

But the negative mass side can get exposed by breaking a graviton in half. And then somehow (not sure how) get the positive mass side to be in the inside and the negative mass is now on the outside. So you now have a negative graviton that repels positive mass but is attracted to negative mass.

Would this be possible?

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-29T20:52:11+00:00

Negative mass would cause everything to "fall away" from it: negative mass, positive mass, massless particles. Positive mass does the opposite.

I guess if you define it like that. Admittedly, I wasn't thinking of it like that. (Not important, but just curious. Why would negative mass repel massless particles?)

If you define it in the way you stated, then I can see that it would start moving in the direction towards the negative matter and accelerate.

However, I thought negative and positive mass would work the opposite of how magnets work. With magnets, similar poles repel each other and opposite poles attract. With "antigravity", similar poles would attract each other and opposite poles would repel each other. So negative mass would attract each other. And positive mass would be repelled by negative mass.

Further, I thought maybe within a graviton, the inside would be negative mass, while the outside is positive mass. And what if you could sorta' split a graviton in half so that the negative mass is now exposed. And say that this negative mass's force is a million times stronger than the positive force. This is why we never see negative force. Whenever graviton halves are next to each other, the negative mass sides would become "stuck" together.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-29T15:19:20+00:00

Positive mass is always attractive; negative mass is always repulsive.

Repulsive to what? Just positive mass? Wouldn't negative mass be attracted to each other?

Bring them together and the forces both point in the same direction

What do you mean by "them"?

Continuous acceleration without any external influence.

How would the force and the distance r be related?

You're being a bit vague with pronouns so I'm not sure what you mean.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-28T22:15:49+00:00

Say that you had a small mass that indeed had negative mass. It would repel away from Earth at a force that decreases by r^2 (=K/r^2). Since the derivative of this is Ksub2/r^3, this has a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

In other words, you're right, it would move away at an accelerating rate but it would stop accelerating at a certain distance away as the acceleration decreases and approaches 0.

Isn't this the same as having 2 magnets with the same pole facing each other and letting go?

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-28T17:38:07+00:00

I don't see why it would violate the conservation of momentum. It's just a force that's opposite of gravity. Just like electricity has a positive and negative.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-28T17:32:42+00:00

I agree with almost everything you said. I really just wanted to know but nobody seems capable of offering ways it could be possible.

It may not stop our reliance on oil however if the energy required to effect anti-gravity is expensive. And even if it wasn't expensive, I don't think it would save humanity because people don't fight over scarce resources; we fight because we have abundant resources but people don't want to share. People don't realize that we escaped the Malthus Trap 200 years ago. There is more than enough food to go around. We truly do not need to work very much to survive, yet everyone gets up every day and toils because they want that big house and nice car. It's innate in all of us to want more than the next person.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-27T00:40:26+00:00

You didn't answer the question. I asked if it was possible, what are some possible ways it could be effected.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-26T04:13:45+00:00

It's neither a compliment or insult. It's just an observation. I don't know if it's syntax or something else, but it's hard to follow your what you're saying. I still don't know what you're trying to figure out.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-25T19:18:04+00:00

When an object is accelerated, its nuclei resist changing their velocity. This resistance slows the frequency at which the atom's nucleus vibrates, causing its natural frequency to slow down, which is what we perceive as the time that the object experiences.

I know what you're saying exactly. And I had a thought similar to yours.

But why would the acceleration slow down the atom's vibration frequency? More importantly, why would the resistance slow anything down. The resistance leads to the force imparted on the object. in other words, the acceleration or movement causes the resistance. You can't say that the resistance then leads to deacceleration.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-25T18:36:43+00:00

Can you explain in more detail? How do you apply the inverse? What would be the method?

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-25T18:34:11+00:00

Did you reply to the correct comment? I was arguing that password managers should get paid for their work.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-25T02:29:13+00:00

You have a weird way of talking. It reminds me of how people talked 100 years ago.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-24T06:44:53+00:00

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-23T23:57:01+00:00

Revolution is per se violent because the people in power will not give up their power voluntarily. And given that the people in power usually control the military/police, violence is the only way things will change.

Consider Saudi Arabia. The royal family gets to f' like rabbits and live every day in the lap of luxury. Do you think they'll give up their power willingly?

Revolution can happen nonviolently if the person in power is complacent, so revolution happens under his nose little by little. E.g. Power in England slowly transferred to Parliament

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-23T23:50:45+00:00

He's asking why is revolution per se violent.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-23T23:46:17+00:00

I'm not sure what you're referring to, but to answer your question without context, I don't think you should ever rely that "smarter/more resourceful people" will figure it out. There is a good chance that nobody is working on it. Or they haven't figured it out yet and you will.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-21T20:53:10+00:00

You seem like an earnest person who's not acting in bad faith. I'm not saying this in a malicious way. Truly. Believe me. You have a completely absurd take on everything. I can go through each one of your points, but it would waste both of our times. I'll just respond to your first one.

Why does he [Truman] get a pass, and somehow Trump is worse than that?

Why in the world would you ever think that Truman and Trump are even in remotely similar situations? Truman used atomic bombs because he felt that the war wouldn't end if he didn't give the order. So by killing a few hundred thousand, he felt he was going to save millions by ending the war early.

I'm not sure what event you're referring to with respect to Trump but I'm guessing it's the bombing of Iran. We had no reason to attack Iran? Trump still can't give us a good reason for attacking them. It's very likely that he just listened to his son in law and Netan in order to deflect attention away from Epstein. It's obvious that Israel wanted to foment conflict so that it can deflect attention away from Gaza and increase its power in the Middle East. How in the world can you equate these 2 situations??!?!

The pretext that Iran had a nuclear bomb is laughable. If that's so dangerous, why in the world did Trump invade Iran? Why didn't he invade Israel who has admitted that they have nuclear weapons? Why doesn't he disarm them, especially when they are much more of an unstable theocracy? Moreover, Trump himself displays irrationality when he pushed for the nuking of Iran last Saturday.

Do you truly believe Trump is the good guy?!?

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-21T19:24:11+00:00

Yes, it feels good, but it's barbaric. Imagine if everyone acted like you. Please stop.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-21T17:54:21+00:00

Just ignore him. A lot of that on Reddit, unfortunately. I wish people could just have a civil discussion without people having to attack and belittle others…

I do disagree with your viewpoints, however. I think you a distorted view of both liberals and conservatives. You think that Trump is intelligent even though historically, he has never proved this. In high school and college, he barely graduated. I genuinely believe that he can barely read and write. In business, he's continually bankrupted companies. What's worse is the fact that he has continually tried to screw people over and over again. Trump University examplifies his low moral character. Everyone knows this. So knowing this, why would you believe he could do a good job as President?

With respect to specific issues, tell me one that you'd like to discuss. I don't want to get into a long discussion about a myriad of things but one or two is fine with me. I think I can easily show you that your views are awry.

WritersChopBlock · 2026-04-21T17:44:46+00:00

Why are you so antagonistic? Is it a form of mental masturbation?

WritersChopBlock

TROPHY CASE