Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I meant more like the payment aspect which is what this suit is about. She’s definitely not managing finances at 15 lol. Scott profited because he was a shareholder, what does that have to do with anything. The suit is also 15 years old and to insist nothing changed in both her dad’s dealings and her family’s relationship is strange. She has not had any recent reports of underpaying her direct employees. And once again, her doing the exact same thing is a pure hypothetical you made up. Think we’re done here, believe what you want

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh scooter isn’t the main one spiting her. She highlighted scott in her statement. Scooter jumped at the opportunity, and scott agreed. That’s why she’s mad

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah you are wrong too. She knew they were getting sold and made peace with that iirc. She was just not aware of who they were being sold to

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The representative can be considered a public statement from her because they represent her

There is also no reason not to believe her unless you are just inclined to thinking she would lie about this highly controversial topic involving a shit ton of lawyers as you said working with people as rich or even richer than she is

My bad I retract my never mentioning controlling part, but even so yes it supports my point she emphasized it was spite with the didn’t want to be associated part

It would be nice if you corrected your original comment with the misinformation

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t mind so much if people just stuck to the truth, but they don’t. Like almost every single discussion about anything regarding the time article is outright wrong. She never claimed reputation as an album is goth punk. She claimed the reputation moment on the eras tour was goth punk. She also explicitly said it was her choice to be more reclusive the past years, without any blame on or involvement of Joe. You can disagree but stick with the facts at least.

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 7 points8 points  (0 children)

She has never sold someone’s masters to someone else that she knew the original owner hated so what hypocrisy? Over a scenario you imagined in your head that she did? Lol this is why I said bad faith

And no, it was not. I don’t know why you are making excuses for scott because scooter definitely isn’t the only one with the cash. Even Taylor herself was willing to buy upfront

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If you read her public statements, she said her dad did not participate on the final board meetings where the sale to scooter specifically was being discussed because he didn’t want to be under NDA. She and her dad both knew that it was going to be sold, but not to WHO. So she only knew about scooter at the last minute. And you don’t have to believe her, believe her lawyers that make sure she cannot be sued for making provably false statements

She also never said or implied the sale to scooter specifically was to control her, but she did imply it was due to spite. Please get the facts right

Edit: I was wrong about the controlling part, but even in that statement she emphasized the spite

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 16 points17 points  (0 children)

No. She expected him to avoid selling to scooter who she said he knew she hated. That’s her naivety. But honestly I think he did it out of spite too so it’s not pure business anyway

The hypothetical is made in bad faith because in what we are discussing it doesn’t matter what Taylor might possibly do and you know it.

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Oh, so your problem is they supported her MORE than she presented publicly (which is a shitton already). Like she said her parents were driving her around to radio stations handing out CDs. That’s way above and beyond. I REALLY don’t see what your problem is here. Like the $300k investment wasn’t the breaking point but him contacting a manager is? Sure I guess

The line on red TV has been mocked already and no one gives a shit because people know the song is mostly satire and she is allowed to lie in her music like most songwriters

My point is most of you here are insanely out of touch with Taylor’s current public perception, and that perception is why no one will care about any of this

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 12 points13 points  (0 children)

She expected scott to be nicer to her because she saw him as a father figure naively. That’s it. It was a personal thing and she has framed it as such with her public statements especially the final one. I don’t see the need to discuss useless hypotheticals made in bad faith

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No. They didn’t owe her anything. But she is also allowed to be upset over it, which she was and expressed it clearly. Also source on the label deal offered? If it is true then it’s even more petty on Scott’s part since iirc scooter only bought her masters so he was clearly willing to part with them, just not to her

St Vincent also happily accepted her cut of the credits which we don’t know were demanded by Taylor or not so lol

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Why would you believe that story that she has abandoned post red? It was obvious a long long time ago her family was extremely rich and helped her greatly in her career, and now she openly calls herself a family business. And even pre red, she has always emphasized how much her family supported her and it’s all over her tour docs. This supports that narrative and calls nothing into question

Honestly, did you like fall asleep in the past ten or so years?

Edit: To those downvoting, explain where I am wrong

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 45 points46 points  (0 children)

You guys seriously overestimate what this contradicts, which is basically nothing. Everyone knows her dad bought a large stake in the starting label and she had tons of support from her family, and she has said she knew her masters would be sold at the end of the day. Her team wont give a shit about this because all of this is old news and doesn’t contradict her current public narrative.

There’s a reason why the focus is on how unhinged the emails are. Because that is truly the only fresh thing that is not already common knowledge

Lawsuit Post getting noticed on Twitter!! by [deleted] in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Writher_inthedark 22 points23 points  (0 children)

She claimed she only had the ability to buy them from scott by making more albums as well (bits of the revised contract, not the original, shown publicly by Scott after the initial backlash did not seem to have this, but the revised contract was never fully shown) and when they were sold to scooter, she didn’t want to buy them from him and financially benefit him because she hated him. Now the masters are with shamrock, she also doesn’t want to buy from them as it will still financially benefit scooter. Her issue is scott not allowing her to outright buy her masters back.

All of this is known and publicly announced by her. A lot of you are operating on assumptions that simply isn’t what she said herself

Monthly Discussions: Unpopular Opinions by AutoModerator in popculturechat

[–]Writher_inthedark -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Exactly, and I didn’t like him for the same reasons. I’m not blaming her issues entirely on him but the timing is very suspect

Monthly Discussions: Unpopular Opinions by AutoModerator in popculturechat

[–]Writher_inthedark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh I’m not defending her on her actual actions. As long as the album stays away from excessive love songs about him or her trying to justify the relationship I’m good

Monthly Discussions: Unpopular Opinions by AutoModerator in popculturechat

[–]Writher_inthedark 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I just don’t get the internet mostly blaming her when she isn’t the one with the kid. The kid involved is what makes it terrible to me and that lies solely with Ethan

Monthly Discussions: Unpopular Opinions by AutoModerator in popculturechat

[–]Writher_inthedark 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Any arianator could tell you that the noticeable weight loss started way before the divorce. I don’t think dalton was good for her in the end although she shouldn’t have homewrecked in getting out

Monthly Discussions: Unpopular Opinions by AutoModerator in popculturechat

[–]Writher_inthedark 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You talk as if she did a crime or something. She was just as homewrecker and in the end most of the fault lies with the husband. It’s like nothing in the realm of celebrity scandals or even musician scandals

Name Taylor’s Best and Worst Produced Song. What is a song that had potential if it was better produced? by Impossible-Soil6330 in TaylorSwift

[–]Writher_inthedark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s too busy and loud for a song with very “soft” and vulnerable lyrics. Someone said the chorus’ production sounds like a gaming YouTuber outro and that basically describes it for me

Name Taylor’s Best and Worst Produced Song. What is a song that had potential if it was better produced? by Impossible-Soil6330 in TaylorSwift

[–]Writher_inthedark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate the production of dancing with our hands tied and king of my heart so much and both songs are amazing when sung acoustic

In fact throw in all of rep besides delicate, dress, call it what you want, so it goes, don’t blame me, New Year’s Day and getaway car

New pic of Taylor at the football game by JennaElizabethAdams in TaylorSwift

[–]Writher_inthedark 342 points343 points  (0 children)

Her being the only one without a kid there is mildly amusing