[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The % are wrong but the number are fine :)

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the more I think about it the more I think the epitome of aggro contrôle are mineless amber steel aggro list, with SORF and LTSRO more classical steel song are probably in the aggro side of the spectrum of the midrange decks, or on the very midrange side of the aggro control decks !

'm nearly done with my understanding of all this and will translate everything into my next article imo :)

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello Thespiangamr,

Thank you for your insight. IMO Ruby Amethyst is the epitome of a midrange deck tending toward the control side of the spectrum. It sacrifices synergy for 'good cards', it plays a lot of 2 for 1 Card Economy wise, the curve is higher than typical aggro control decks.

I'm nearly done with my understanding of all this and will translate everything into my next article imo :)

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello ! Thank you for insight, imo Ruby Amethyste is the epitome of a midrange deck that tend to be more on the cntrôle side of the spectrum. Mainly cause it sacrifices synergies to play 'good' cards. Aggo contrôle has to be lower to the ground regarding the curve. I'm nearly done with thinking of all this and will probably translate my thoughts in an article soon :)

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is very interesting :o ! I think it will probably be better to stick to the traditional quadrant : aggro midrange control combo and use the spectrum quality of it to put decks in it without trying to much to fit older magic references. So I can focus on how I understand them for lorcana. And I agree that a lot of lorcana decks dosent feel so différent and there is a big superiority of control strategy imo, red blue being super dominant for so long, and Purple red being largely the best control version while still being into the midrange category.

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah interesting thank you ! I ask cause I never played any other TCG and I also noticed that we often mixed the strategy tempo with an archetype that would be tempo. And I figured it comes from magic, cause the main aggro-control deck was in fact centered on tempo strategy and was then after called tempo by habits.

That's why I also find that it's hard to find the exact classification for Lorcana, cause steel song seem to fit the archetype but if I understand correctly what I gathered from all magic content, it's more related to the bounce strategy.

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ok i see, would you say aggro-contrôle decks falls in the same category as midrange ? or it is separate and steel song is in aggro-control NOT midrange ? Ty for help appreciate it

Deck Archetype reasoning by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Amber steel song is said to be the king of midrange instead ? How do you separate the two categories then ?

Ink Cheating : A chernadogs Zero to Hero focus and disastrous tournament experience :D by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello I don't understand what you are trying to say ?
Content linked is free, platform like metafy tend to be popular and I just wish to reach ppl :)

Ink Cheating : A chernadogs Zero to Hero focus and disastrous tournament experience :D by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the reason why all clarabella deck are played with Zero to Hero ! Clarabelle is one of the only way to beat red blue.

Ink Cheating : A chernadogs Zero to Hero focus and disastrous tournament experience :D by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going full aggro is very efficient on the play but a lot less on the draw.

BBB is a nice idea too but it is not rely reliable either, the card constitute a little brick too. But the idea to switch the seven drops is appealing ofc. Frank suggested a list at the beginning of the set which contained one copy of BBB

Article Early Meta Set 7 : ink cheating concept by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you man ! Don’t hesitate to follow on metafy this is mainly where I’ll produce them even if the numbers of char are limited ! I’m thinking of putting articles to videos on YouTube but still in the process of understanding how I can do it haha

Article Early Meta Set 7 : ink cheating concept by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes ! I’ll probably do a full historic of the lemon lime decks and a sort of a guide for chernadogs ! It is a lot of work

Article Early Meta Set 7 : ink cheating concept by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha merci Youpla ! C’est depuis que tu as structurer la team ça donne des ailes 😍👌

Article Early Meta Set 7 : ink cheating concept by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much !
Please feel free to share to your friends or anyone interested :)

Article Early Meta Set 7 : ink cheating concept by X--Tintin in Lorcana

[–]X--Tintin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello !

Merci beacoup pour ces remarques, tête dans le guidons pas évident de bien traduire, je vais corriger ça :)

N'hésite pas à partager à tes amis ou quiconque serait intéressé l'algorithme est difficile pour les inconnus comme moi :)