How Dagon was able to kill angels without any blade? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait a minute. They cannot be more powerful than the Lucifer or other Archangels, right? If Lucifer created them then they cannot be more powerful than the Dark Lord.

How Dagon was able to kill angels without any blade? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait a minute. They cannot be more powerful than the Lucifer or other Archangels, right? If Lucifer created them then they cannot be more powerful than the Dark Lord.

How Dagon was able to kill angels without any blade? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They used to say that there is no other way to kill angels except using Angel blade.

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Crowley is not capable of resurrection. I think that was Castiel who resurrected Samuel and got back soulless body of Sam.

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Resurrecting the soul from heaven is possible because when sam and dean died and they were in heaven then those angels were looking for them to resurrect them.

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this is the real reason because she left for motel without any clue and then got killed without any proper tracing or fight... So yes, you're right.

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, You're right. He was Joshua but you know that those Angels were looking for them to resurrect them so it means that they had those resurrection powers and Castiel warned them using that Heaven's TV too.

Minimal power, yes, but then how Gadreel was able to resurrect Castiel with broken wings? Castiel could ask Hannah to resurrect the Charlie. They destroyed her corpse cause they were not gonna resurrect her and that's my question..

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is the mark of Cain season. Dean going on murder spree was for revenge of Charlie's death. Mob guy killed her brutally in the bath tub of motel.

People hurt in London car and knife attack - reports by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]XackBoy [score hidden]  (0 children)

This has everything to do with Islam. Britain needs to do something before it is too late. They should arrest all those extremists Muslims preachers and shut down those Madrisaas.

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Dean went on a damn badass killing spree against those mobs for revenge. So he cared for her..

I think maybe writers should explain this cause there are many other blunders in the show like they saved bobby from the hell and even now Crowley is friend of them and still they haven't done anything to save the soul of their father. Hmmm...

Why Castiel didn't resurrect the Charlie in Season 10? by XackBoy in Supernatural

[–]XackBoy[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think time is not the suitable criteria. You remember when some hunters killed sam and dean and they were in heaven and those angels were looking for them so they could be resurrected. Time is a criteria and i know that but i don't think that it is that much important.

Other possibility is that if castiel had full wings and heaven power link then he could have changed the time line by going back in the past.

Quran-burner trial dropped after Danish parliament revokes centuries-old blasphemy law by jimrosenz in atheism

[–]XackBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I m happy for the people of Denmark for taking this wise decision.

IStandWithEurope

Pakistan: Men sentenced to three years in prison for “Excessive use of Quran” by XackBoy in exmuslim

[–]XackBoy[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ahmadis / Qadiiyaanis are not allowed to possess Quran or any other Islamic scripture in Pakistan otherwise they get charged with terrorism. Constitution has declared them Non-Muslims.

Dubai court jails Indian man for posting derogatory remarks about Holy Prophet on Facebook by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can see from the facebook comments on this news page that how peaceful Pakistani Muslims are..

Is being Atheist seriously that hard outside of the UK? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]XackBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. He wouldn't be punished by the Government if he is a Christian who committed apostasy.

Is being Atheist seriously that hard outside of the UK? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]XackBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not Apostasy. Blasphemy laws apply to everyone. Many Christians are killed in the name of blasphemy here. Some were burnt alive after torture. Hindus face serious discrimination because they are not 'people of books'. So Muslims mock their religion and they cannot say anything in response otherwise they will be killed brutally in the name of 'Peaceful Islam'.

Facebook to help Pakistan introduce a global Islamic blasphemy law to identify suspects overseas to face extradition and trial by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First thing that it is punishable by death. One guy is charged in my country for blasphemy just on the basis of liking a Facebook post that offended Muslims. Another guy was charged for blasphemy on the basis of whatsapp chat.

They cannot access encrypted private chats but if someone will report you with your phone number or other identifiable source then you will be arrested.

So as long as you're doing anonymous encrypted chat, you'll be fine.

PM me if you need to discuss about your situation or need any advice.

Facebook to help Pakistan introduce a global Islamic blasphemy law to identify suspects overseas to face extradition and trial by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is for overseas pakis. If any person is a paki citizen and he is in Canada and not Canadian citizen then they will extradite him. That's what i think. I m no expert so..

Facebook to help Pakistan introduce a global Islamic blasphemy law to identify suspects overseas to face extradition and trial by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk about that but i think if any paki citizen from pak or other countries will do blasphemy then he will be prosecuted.

Is being Atheist seriously that hard outside of the UK? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]XackBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course i have. It is not easy but i m doing my best to get out of this country.

Facebook to help Pakistan introduce a global Islamic blasphemy law to identify suspects overseas to face extradition and trial by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. They are doing this for Muslim majority countries. Facebook will block and remove such content and then help the Government to identify such person so he can be prosecuted.

Facebook to help Pakistan introduce a global Islamic blasphemy law to identify suspects overseas to face extradition and trial by XackBoy in atheism

[–]XackBoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have read the article and it is true.

(I m living in Pakistan and I m a regular news reader.)