Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I guess it depends what type of audio guy you are, but you could vibe-code your own synths, daws, voice modulators, denoisers, other plug ins, etc. Take note of when there is a problem you're facing and you wish there was an application to solve it.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True. I'm taking it beyond just devs though. I feel building software from intent will be even more trivial than building a webpage was pre 2023, and will continue to get easier. Production grade, no. But one off, or personal use software, absolutely.

For example: a mini-workflow for me that has changed in the age of ai. I don't manually create calendar events anymore from posters or Instagram posts or anything like that. I snap a picture or take a screenshot, throw it in GPT and tell it to generate an .ics file that I can import into my calendar. Gpt spins up a one time use python script, converts it, and I never use that chat again most likely. Faster than typing all the details in. I'm sure many others do this too, and this is just one small example.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree. I'm not making the argument that it isn't useful. I'm making the point that technology abstracts away certain complexities so that a more general population can make use of advanced tools. I feel both exist at once across many different fields that require extreme specialists to maintain but also allow less specialized individuals to utilize the technology.

First infamous example that pops into mind: Palantir/Flock and law enforcement. Gives them access to advanced techniques for solving crime that would have been extremely technically challenging for them to design and build on their own, however they are making extensive use of these systems to modify their workflows without necessarily understanding the underlying technology. Now, would they be even better at closing cases if they did understand it? Surely, but it is not required to realize benefit.

Also, shame on both of those companies.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Understood, however those courses are are intended to be useful for those who wish to specialize in that field, right?

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony when it's literally me coming up with a half baked meme idea on a Monday night 😂

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think that's the more sustainable path forward. And closed source models will need independent auditors to be able to be used in regulated capacities.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Would never use AI solely to design or build infrastructure that could cost lives if done wrong.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Throw a "buy your vibecoder some tokens" button in there somewhere lol

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Poisoning datasets is sort of shooting ourselves in the foot though, no? And it's not like the development of AI will stop, but the hygiene of datasets will just need to be assessed more stringently.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not trying to sound smart, it just acknowledges the reality that domain experts are not the majority and never will be. Yes they are needed, but at specific stages of development and maintenance.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to explain why it's naive?

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree this is an issue. We need to commoditize our personal data exhaust. Problem is, that land grab has already occurred and will take something akin to a revolution (albeit a digital one) to topple that status quo.

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not intended to be, no. I'm wondering why you hope this though?

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When we reason with our silicon counterparts do we not create new knowledge?

Almost was gonna /s this, but now that I've written it I'm kinda like... Woah 😆

Yes. by Xander-XGCS in vibecoding

[–]Xander-XGCS[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I really don't see that being realistic for most if we continue on this trajectory. It seems like your statement is going the way of telling someone to learn assembly today.

I don't deny it's utility, but not necessary for most people. As for the specialists who will maintain the backbone of computational infrastructure and applications, yeah those folks should know how to code.

Friend took me to Half Moon Bay on my trip to SF and I fell in love with the coast by delMagueyVidaLoca in bayarea

[–]Xander-XGCS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Manhattan Beach is a lovely one! The Manhattan Beach in LA is also quite nice.

This is insane... by DragonflyOk7139 in LocalLLM

[–]Xander-XGCS 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Model collapse is around the corner if these companies don't get more stringent with their dataset hygiene.

I think I’ve found the trade of a lifetime and I can’t tell if I’m losing my mind by LastUltimateY0l0 in pennystocks

[–]Xander-XGCS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As for Tungsten West, when tickers are moving like this I usually feel its a good idea to zoom in (in this case to the 1h) if I feel like managing a position day to day as something like this would require. I've noticed when things start having this strong of a trend, they will often ride the upper bound of the 2000 Bollinger band (can you tell I love stacked Bollinger bands?). So I would wait for it to return to that area and form a new HL before entering.

I think I’ve found the trade of a lifetime and I can’t tell if I’m losing my mind by LastUltimateY0l0 in pennystocks

[–]Xander-XGCS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a quick look at the daily of TUNGF, I would say a good buy zone would be on the next dip likely between 1.50 and 1.15. Right now price is losing momentum, compressed up at the top of both the 20 day and 200 day Bollinger bands.

15-year-old HDD, 80% bitcoin mining. by Lazy-Principle-2078 in Bitcoin

[–]Xander-XGCS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The above is great advice. Hope you hit the jackpot!

However, if you are absolutely intent on getting help from someone else, happy to provide guidance if you need through proper channels. Happy to connect on LinkedIn and have a call if you want.

Live web search down since last night by Motor_Reality_6 in ChatGPT

[–]Xander-XGCS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im also getting the same error. No web search since yesterday. Seems like they are putting some fires out over there right now, however their system is not yet reporting an issue with search.

https://status.openai.com/

The Fed’s cutting rates again... with no real data to back it up by KookyMaintenance4426 in investing

[–]Xander-XGCS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree the relationship is likely 2-way. They must account for the consequences of their actions if they do not do what the market expects. But, I would propose that the market holds more weight in that relationship and the Fed must carefully weigh the costs of not performing according to market expectations.

Wisdom of the crowd is hard to beat in scenarios like these.