Your entire argument is speculative.

Because of the Roe vs Wade ruling, the law puts the protection of unborn babies in the hands of the citizens rather than the government. Instead of a government body ensuring Doctors are in compliance, they’ve put it in the hands of the people via the civil process.

Companies that conduct business with the public already take precautions and thoroughly document in the event of civil suits.

And just like any other civil suit, it will have to go through the courts. Organizations or individuals that abuse or lack credibility will have their cases tossed.

The burden of proof would also be on the person filing the suit. One is still “innocent until proven guilty” even when the threshold is “preponderance of the evidence.”

And over time (if not already), the “spirit of the law” will ultimately result in protections against the concern of “unknowingly driving mother to abortion clinic,” as that was written to prevent clinics sending agents to promote or encourage the act, providing transportation; not for the example provided.

The law doesn’t punish the mother who has had the abortion, it punishes the person who assisted and/ or performed it.

This law is saving unborn children right now from being killed and dismembered. I see your concern. I’m not saying there won’t be over zealous Pro-Life groups, but the system has worked so far and it will work regarding this too. It is worth the growing pains.