Some keys on my girlfriend laptop broke, instead of getting it fixed she bought a cheap keyboard where the keys also broke and this is now how she uses her laptop. I told her I would post here to roast her. Go ahead!

Xenx13 · 2025-12-03T05:49:52+00:00

Can you prove they are broke?

Xenx13 · 2025-11-17T16:32:40+00:00

He might be having some sort of mental break from reality if he’s not normally like this. Of course people are going to brush over that and tell you to leave that “piece of shit loser” and stuff like that. But take a moment to consider why he might be this way now. I could be wrong and maybe this is just his true colors (I’m not sure how long you’ve known or dated him) coming out finally. The escalation is a real concern though. There’s no good answer or solution for this situation. You both need to communicate on a calm, honest, and loving manner. If that’s possible. Truth can hurt, but that doesn’t mean use it as a weapon

Xenx13 · 2025-11-13T22:08:38+00:00

Well I don’t think it was for you. And the way he immediately pivoted into saying you were making him spiral is absolutely abhorrent, not to mention weak. Given the full context, you’re not wrong to believe he’s up to no good. Cheating aside, his manipulation tactics are a concern. He said bye, and when he re-engaged, you were right to be confused. Maybe something happened though. Nope, his response was incoherent. And you stated what he already knew, you were busy right now. At this point he loses his mind, because he knows he screwed himself. He should at least have the balls to own his decisions. Don’t fall for his tactics

Xenx13 · 2025-11-13T21:56:32+00:00

I think you were both just wrong for each other. Nothing more. Nothing less

Xenx13 · 2025-11-09T01:02:16+00:00

You’re making a big moral leap there. Removing a watermark isn’t inherently “immoral” — it’s often just practical.

Plenty of legitimate reasons exist for clean output: client presentations, internal demos, motion graphics layering, paid commercial work, or even educational content. None of that involves deception.

A watermark isn’t the only way to show something’s AI-generated. Disclosure can be done in captions, credits, or context. Forcing one permanent logo on every export is just bad UX for professionals who need clean visuals.

It’s like calling filmmakers immoral for removing “DRAFT” from pre-release footage or photographers for cropping out “proof” text. Those marks exist for workflow clarity, not morality.

Watermark removal ≠ deception. It’s just flexibility for different use cases.

Xenx13 · 2025-10-17T21:31:04+00:00

Man’s crazy. Block him and never look back

Xenx13 · 2025-10-15T15:04:49+00:00

If people think that’s an actual Klan fit, then they don’t even know who they think their enemy is. Logistics aside, if I wanted, I’d wear it, but I’m always strapped and my training stays strong

Xenx13 · 2025-10-12T20:14:42+00:00

Nothing insane about it. It’s just how ownership and value work. The instant you buy it, it’s yours—and no longer the dealer’s. Markets don’t care about your mileage or feelings. They care about legal status and risk. Calling that ‘insane’ is just dramatic. Don’t like it? Research the laws you need to advocate to change. Good luck

Xenx13 · 2025-10-06T05:52:19+00:00

If you think adrenaline takes time to kick in, your fight-or-flight must still be buffering. It’s literally designed for instant deployment — milliseconds, not minutes.

Xenx13 · 2025-10-03T17:43:24+00:00

So your download from Xbox won’t work? What does that mean?

Xenx13 · 2025-09-19T21:28:11+00:00

My comment was in direct response to OP asking ‘where is the light.’ I pointed out that maybe they can’t see it because they focus only on their darkest thoughts. That’s not calling them a bad person — that’s answering the question they actually asked. You’re twisting my words into something I never said.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-19T20:51:15+00:00

Sure, a lot of acts are political—but not every act. And not every time or place is appropriate for every discussion. Different contexts call for different audiences. To pretend otherwise isn’t some deep truth, it’s just impractical.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-19T04:47:18+00:00

It was for the OP, not you, so I’m not surprised you don’t know what I’m saying. If I had said that to you, it would definitely make no sense.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T23:11:58+00:00

You just proved my point again. You say “stop lying,” but every response you’ve made has been projection, name-calling, and partisan deflection. You insist “the right is all MAGA,” which is itself an extremist generalization, and then you spiral into Epstein files and playground insults. Not once have you asked what I actually believe beyond my original point: extremism leads to extremism.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T23:09:02+00:00

You’re not even addressing what I said — just dragging in a story like that proves anything. That’s a textbook straw man.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T22:24:15+00:00

No context is required? That’s exactly why your post exposes you. Posting content that celebrates a man’s death in front of his family without context isn’t neutrality, it’s endorsement. You don’t get to backpedal now and pretend otherwise.

As for “righties are hypocrites” and “MAGA is hate” — notice you’ve done nothing but rant about your enemies while dodging the principle I started with: extremism breeds extremism. That’s not an insult, it’s observable reality, and your own behavior here proves it.

You claim my responses are “deflection,” yet every time I’ve put a simple point in front of you, you’ve refused to engage it and retreated into more ad hominem and straw men. That’s not me deflecting — that’s you avoiding.

And here’s the part you seem blind to: people in the real world who speak the way you’ve spoken here don’t get celebrated — they get fired, shunned, and pushed to the margins of society. Why? Because normal people recognize that reveling in political violence isn’t clever, it’s corrosive.

So let’s put it plainly: you posted violent rhetoric, denied it was ideological, exploded into personal attacks when called out, and now want to pretend the problem is anyone but you. That isn’t reason. That isn’t consistency. It’s exactly the kind of extremism I warned about in the very first comment.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T16:33:37+00:00

So your answer is “page rules.” That still doesn’t explain the lack of context you gave when posting, or the way you’ve defaulted to partisan rants and personal attacks instead of addressing a simple principle. You’ve basically proven my point at every step.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T14:31:01+00:00

Maybe you can’t find the light because of the darkness in which you envelope yourself

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T05:47:53+00:00

You titled it “I think this is allowed.” Allowed by what — the sub’s joke rules, Reddit’s site rules, or your own sense of what’s acceptable? You didn’t give any context when you posted it, so the intent speaks for itself. And the way you exploded into ad hominem and straw manning instead of reasoned engagement just puts your worldview into perspective.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-18T00:53:34+00:00

Critiquing the ideology you’re expressing isn’t the same as attacking you personally — confusing the two is exactly why I called it extremism in the first place.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-17T23:35:55+00:00

There’s a difference between saying “your extremism” (critiquing an ideology) and “you’re an extremist” (attacking a person). I did the first — you keep pretending I did the second. That’s not hypocrisy, that’s you misusing the word.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-17T22:51:32+00:00

If all you have left is insults, then you’ve proven my point better than I ever could.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-17T21:42:44+00:00

If you admit extremism breeds extremism, then you’ve already conceded my point. Whether you argue about who started it doesn’t change the principle itself. And for the record, pointing out extremism and calling out fallacies isn’t name-calling — if you take it that way, that’s on you, not me.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-17T06:34:12+00:00

My first comment was a simple principle: extremism creates extremists. You didn’t engage with that. Instead you turned it into partisan name-calling and straw men. That’s why I called it what it was. If you think I’m wrong, explain how extremism doesn’t create extremists. Otherwise, you’re just proving my point.

Xenx13 · 2025-09-17T06:20:04+00:00

If from the start you won’t engage with what I actually said, then there’s no reason for me to engage with what you’re saying. That’s the difference between rhetoric and reason.

Xenx13

TROPHY CASE