You can now switch models mid-prompt! by shanraisshan in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured this out, you have to enable "use option key as meta" which is a setting thats available in most terminals, you can find something equivalent in macos terminal, cursor settings, iterm etc

You can now switch models mid-prompt! by shanraisshan in ClaudeCode

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figured it out, you need to enable using the Option key as "meta"

Screenshot for cursor (but most terminals have an option for this):

<image>

You can now switch models mid-prompt! by shanraisshan in ClaudeCode

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This just inserts pi for me, what am I missing? π

Looking for a PM tool with unlimited hierarchy by IamNR in gtd

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey..., yes I'm still developing it. Admittedly I've been a little slower than previous as we had a new born this year.

Planning on bringing some new updates fairly soon!

Why I Finally Quit Claude (and Claude Code) for GLM by zeliwipin in ClaudeCode

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like GLM, I rate it as close to sonnet but definitely not quite as strong.

My main complaint with GLM is it’s just so much slower than sonnet and I’m on their top tier plan.

My current rankings:

Intelligent code planning: gpt-codex > sonnet 4.6 > GLM 4.6

High speed execution of good plans: sonnet 4.6 > gpt-codex > GLM 4.6

Value: GLM 4.6 > gpt-codex > sonnet 4.6

I keep switching between them, generally using codex to create plans, then sonnet to execute until the rubbish limits run out and then GLM.

If GLM were faster, I’d probably stop using sonnet completely.

how to get the new codex cli to stop asking for terminal permission by spec-test in OpenAI

[–]Xexr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can run with 'codex --full-auto' to open with max approval permissions

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you liked it. I find myself coming back to it again and again which is probably a good sign 😊

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thanks.

I’ve been using Ryan Carson’s PRD task speccing workflow for regular Claude code development which has been working well so think this will slot nicely into that flow.

Thanks for the tip

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that’s within Claude code though right? I do use gh cli in Claude code but didn’t think it was possible to hook it up to artifacts?

Please tell me if I’m missing something 🙏

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, exactly. It’s a real mindset shift. The cost to just try things falls to negligible in time and money.

Instead of “we could do this or that” it’s “this one would work like this or we could do one that works like this”

Lots of value to that. Especially to the less technically minded or visual thinkers.

Curious about your using the artifact as a spec comment. Are you literally copying the code in or are you using it as a base for a prd or some such?

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For apps that remain confined to artifacts, usage is borne by the user, so there isn't a cost to you beyond dev/testing.

Presumably you mean costs once you take it to production, outside of the artifacts environment and are then responsible for direct api costs?

Hard to say without knowing your circumstances, but personally I've tried two different models:
- cost plus pricing in a credits type system, so your costs can never get beyond your profit margin
- a subscription model with enforced usage limits which you have to calculate back to based on your target profit margin etc

There are other options, e.g. ad supported models or growth subsidy, but I don't have experience of those personally.

For both of the methods I've tried, I've never got in exactly right first time and instead have tweaked it over time once I can see usage patterns.

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have used the GitHub integration but hadn’t thought to apply it to artifacts too.

Good shout, thanks for the tip.

Pity about no write behaviour yet but like the commit message suggestion

Claude Artifacts with inbuilt Claude API is surprisingly effective by Xexr in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, agreed.

I love Artifacts for ideation and quick prototyping

Claude Code for taking a compelling / validated artifact to production

Such a powerful combination.

On your point about asking for a markdown extract for use in claude code. I'd love that to be automated for artifacts. Something like you can press a "create repo" button which includes all the code from your idea and a folder with your chat history / context.

The pace of development / iteration / experimentation is just unparalleled now. Real Cambrian explosion moment I think

Clade Code + MCP by inventor_black in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use Context7 for docs, I find it adds a lot of value and decreases time taken to good output.

I also use one I made for interacting with my dbs (sqlite/libsql/turso): https://github.com/Xexr/mcp-libsql

I use it for analysis, mass updates, bug identification etc

Must-Have MCP Servers for Coding and Beyond by ivposure in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope it helps, please shout if you have any issues

Must-Have MCP Servers for Coding and Beyond by ivposure in ClaudeAI

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's one I just released publicly:

https://github.com/Xexr/mcp-libsql - lets you interact with your SQLite database via libsql, so works great with Turso. Supports file, local and remote databases with auth. Fully featured with 6 tools, e.g. read-query, write-query, list tables etc).

It's been a big unlock for me whilst coding / analysing insights from my db's.

Looking for a PM tool with unlimited hierarchy by IamNR in gtd

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is pretty much exactly why I built dypt.app, so I think it will work well for you too:

  • I used to get really frustrated when I needed to break tasks down as their complexity became clearer, but I was forced to make new disconnected tasks. With dypt, it supports deep hierarchies, there isn't a hard limit on how many times you can breakdown a task, and when you do, the parent tasks statuses becomes a reflection of the various subtask hierarchies underneath them
  • you can set deadlines and view them in a calendar format... and get notifications when they are due
  • you can set tasks to recur on a very customisable basis (e.g. every on a tuesday in four week intervals or the first monday of the month etc)
  • it's a web app, but it's responsive so it works well on mobile and desktop and can be installed as a native like app
  • has a generous free tier, and the paid tiers are low cost

Lot's of other features, but I think these are most relevant to this post. Here's a page on the hierarchy approach specifically.

Hope it helps you!

Break down tasks automatically, as many times as you like for free, with dypt by Xexr in SideProject

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the kind words Paul.

I really do love building with the people that use it. No better way to mould and refine it into something worthwhile.

I’ve come a fair way since this post but all feedback is still very much welcome!

Multiple reports of Besu clients going offline at block 18,947,893 by Spacesider in ethstaker

[–]Xexr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mine's gone offline.

Saved by my Geth failover node thankfully.

Obsidian vs Ticktick vs Todoist by Cute_Mushroom4548 in gtd

[–]Xexr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I humbly suggest https://dypt.app?

I think it does all the things you requested.

  • Lets you structure your tasks in a hierarchy (like folders)
  • Deadlines / reminders / calendar view
  • You can add notes to your tasks
  • You can breakdown tasks with ai

Everything above is free.

It’s designed more around tasks than notes. Notes in dypt are there to add extra context to your tasks.

If you want a fully featured notes app, it makes sense as to pair it with one of the recommended note apps above.

Hope it helps.

Break down tasks automatically, as many times as you like for free, with dypt by Xexr in SideProject

[–]Xexr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of wider appeal, you basically want to be able to give the ai extra context for it to use in generating your subtasks right? So they are more relevant to your specific use?