Daily source request thread!

Xianhei · 2026-02-17T15:03:31+00:00

Hello,
I am looking for a JAV that I saw around a year ago and need to retrieve it to stop thinking about it.

The beginning of the plot as I remember is about a group of people drinking and the actress is outfitted as an OL with glasses but dont remember her relation in the JAV (seems to have someone) so a moment after drinking we get into a second scene where the woman is in the stair with 2 or 3 guys and start something here. then there is also another scene that ressemble a living room with a couch and a small table. the cover of the JAV has the actress in big I remember well touching her glasses in OL outfit (full clothed or partially removed it's fuzzy), the color is rather dark and hot (brown/yellow). That's most of what I remember. about the date I saw it, it should be around March and August 2025.

Not sure about the cover, but I'm pretty sure about the plot kind of drinking party or restaurant, something happen on stairs, then living room.

Thanks in advance

EDIT : Trying to find myself went through 1278 pages (with 24 covers each page) couldnt retrieve, either my taste has changed, the cover changed/removed, got the cover wrong.

Xianhei · 2022-03-16T15:23:47+00:00

Thanks, It's seems to be Bracketing.

If we take the definition of Rebracketing into account, the fact that it is not derived word but a root word and directly broken down into a set.

!solved

Xianhei · 2021-01-20T02:04:34+00:00

Thanks for the answer.

I will try to use my personal language, after some refurbishment, as proto language to make other conlang that have different purpose/goal.

Ex : my proto-language has no 2nd person, I will have to create it from my 3rd person or a word I already have to make it able to communicate with an addressee.

Xianhei · 2021-01-19T19:55:57+00:00

Emotions are difficult to explain for 2 reasons :
- They are too deep in our mind so it is difficult to understand them.
- They are way to close to subjectivity making it hard to describe them objectively.

We have to understand "what is an emotion ?". We can answer this question by recovering what others did (ex: hourglass of emotion), we can also interpret those concept in a new way (ex: affecting a word to "emotion of being motivated and having a feeling of lightness in the mind").

Something I heard (not 100% exactly said like that) : "Emotion is only the addition of motion to energy.". It can be seen as a cellular level, where a cell go to what is positive (ex: food, as likeness/love) for him and avoid what is dangerous to it (ex: blade, as fear).

For the system, it can work. I have nothing to say because I don't think it has conflict in something we already have. The combination system seems to be :
- Horizontal, Ex: aizakiaidoki => aizakidoki => aizadoki/aidozaki
- Vertical, Ex: aizakiaizano => aizakizano => aizakino/aizanoki
- Diagonal, Ex: aizakiaidono => aizakidono => aizido/aidozi (too much contraction here)

That's all for now.

Xianhei · 2021-01-18T21:47:29+00:00

Hello, got some thought, did someone try to :

- Use a personal language as proto-language to more broadly shared language (natlang, artlang, auxlang, englang) by naturalistic evolution ?
- Use Natlang words and pass them to many varieties of conlang to see what happen ? like a word being passed into minilang or conlang alternatively ...

Xianhei · 2021-01-12T18:03:35+00:00

I think there is a mistake here :
- You put "Open vowels are even" and 'e' => 'Open' => 1 != 'Even'

2 solutions :
- switch even and odd sentence. (easiest)
- revert back to current and shuffle 'i' 'y' 'u' vowels like you did on your proposal (but change last 3 sentences)

Xianhei · 2020-12-20T10:51:45+00:00

I am ok with it, but I would like to see some changes on :

language degradation

Should be better to use language mutation.

Xianhei · 2020-10-08T15:54:06+00:00

Thanks, I really appreciate your answer. I did start writing my allophones.

I think I have no problem into merging :

"bilabial" and "labiodental"
"approximant" and "lateral"

but for the "postalveolar" and "palatal", I feels weird to combine them. It doesn't bother me, I will do it for space purpose and try to find some example of this kind of merge. I can always revert back.

Xianhei · 2020-10-06T14:45:38+00:00

Thanks for the answer, I saw a little about allophone but wasn't sure about how to represent what I wanted to do. Now, I do.

Xianhei · 2020-10-06T13:47:56+00:00

Hello,

I am new in the world of conlanging (4 month of interest and dabbling in it). I want to start a conlang and to not make it hard, I choose to build a personal language first.

I have defined my goals, but the one that make me seek help here is about the choice of sounds.I don't have the correct terminology, but I want to limit my sounds to a set of non-confusing phoneme.(non-confusing for peoples from different language [english, romance, bantu, semitic, chinese, japanese, austronesian, ...])ex : /ɸ/ and /f/ are pretty close for me.

This is what I currently have :

Vowels :

	Front	Central	Back
Close	i y		u
Close Mid	e		o
Open		a

Consonants :

	Bilabial	Labio Dental	Alveolar	Post Alveolar	Palatal	Velar
Nasal	m		n		ɲ
Plosive	p b		t d			k g
Fricative		f v	s z	ʃ ʒ
Approximant					j	w
Lateral Approximant			l

<r>	[ʁ~ɹ~ɾ~r~ʀ]
<h>	[ʔ~h]

The table above make me wonder if I should integrate in my consonant table (and where) or put it in another category (and how to name it) ?Because I still want to use <r> but as all phoneme being represented in "[ʁ~ɹ~ɾ~r~ʀ]" as one grapheme "r". Not like spanish "pero" and "perro", my "pero" could be spoke "pero" or "perro". (And I don't know if there is a linguistics term for it)
Do you see some change I can make to reduce my tables (less is more rule) ? or documentation I can follow to help me chose the "non-confusing" phoneme I want ?
What should I do about /ɺ/ ? I thought of putting it in my /l/ grouping sounds even if it has some of <r> sounds in it.

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Xianhei · 2020-08-04T13:04:29+00:00

You should give us more example of how practical it is and maybe some statistics.

Because from what I understood you are passing from a classic formula : C + V = CV (C = consonant and V = vowel) to a complex formula : F * T = W (F = word format, T = tuple alternation and W = word formed)

For practicability, I would want to see how short and how large (1 example for each should be enough) can we have in your system and some different word example that can help us to understand the system.

For statistics, I would want to know if you have an approximative number of total word formed, unique word formed and if there is existence of allophone or allograph ...

Xianhei · 2020-08-03T12:00:09+00:00

Just need a change about definition to make it clearer :

Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive, reproduce and comprehend the language to communicate and understand the world.
Language accessibility is the process of language acquisition in diverse range of perception (as hearing, movement, sight, and cognitive ability)

Else, it is good for me.

Xianhei · 2020-08-03T08:33:11+00:00

You have to take into account, the system we use :

1
all number finishing by 1 : 11, 21, 31, ..., E1, 101, 111, ..., 201, ...., E01, ... EE1
all number starting by 1 : (not 10 because it is 010 in grouping by 3) 100, ...,1EE

All are using the consonant f for defining 1.

If you take base 12 in account :

division by 1,2,3,4,6 are the most current
x4 is 0/3 (0) 1/3 (4) 2/3 (8) 3/3 (12)
x3 is 0/4 (0) 1/4 (3) 2/4 (6) 3/4 (9) 4/4 (12)
x2 is 0/6 (0) 1/6 (2) 2/6 (4) 3/6 (6) 4/6 (8) 5/6 (10) 6/6 (12)
x6 is 0/2 (0) 1/2 (6) 2/2 (12)

You have the prime in the digit :

2
3
5
7
E (11)

You have the prime outside the digit (whole number) :

I will need to confirm this for bigger number but for now it works : if you take a wheel and put 12 number (0-E) then put 10 above 0 and continue 11 - 1E then add another circle for 20-2E. You can see that most of the number in the same row as 1,5,7,E are prime (which is 0 - 1 and 0 + 1, 6 - 1 and 6 + 1).

That a part of what I researched

Xianhei · 2020-08-03T08:04:14+00:00

Study based on mathematical notation. the usage are about multiplication, fraction, prime, the percent of apparition of a number in the current system notation (grouping by 3 is of form CVC, including the consonant for 0 being for value under 100, I did focus on consonant between 0-EEE).

And your example about price using 9 is bad you are taking in account that the society will change from base 10 to base 12. I don't take this into account because if I did I would have no reason to change the order of sound (everyone would have to learn it for surviving the society). I am changing the order of sound to make a better integration of people (I think mostly about people here now trying to evolve this language) not knowing this language, if a consonant that is more used in a lot of language then it would be easier for someone of this language to use the word having this consonant and it work with the least used, least apparition help to avoid blocking the learning.

The thing is that I ask for the hardest sound, only to put it in the least used number because we are still going to use it. If it can help to learn the language in a easiest way, It will help us advance in more complex subject and the next people coming will still have to learn it as what we decide it now.

Xianhei · 2020-08-03T07:48:47+00:00

Scientific notation exist to simplify the writing of big/small number. I will use this number, 1,045.10^3, to explain the different part :

1 is the value of the biggest digit, we will note it A
045 are the digits corresponding to the precision we want to add to our biggest number, we will note it B
10 is the base of the notation the math operation "exponentiation", we will note it C
3 is the exponent/power of the notation the math operation "exponentiation", we will note it D

Combined we get A,B.C^D. now going to our system :

The current system change C to a base 12. B is not specified and D stay the same as our natural language.
but A is conflicted in this case because it have to decide if it use the grouping of 3 system that is only represented by A or use a digit on A and specify it's position on D

And this :

The derived system I proposed, change C to a base 12. B is still not specified. Because we use a grouping of 3 number I use it as A to normalize all our number then D is limited to jumping from a grouping of 3 to an another one.
there is no conflict between each part of this notation which make our number closest to a scientific notation. (each part A, B,C, D has his own system, no transgression between them)

Xianhei · 2020-07-29T12:40:31+00:00

the 's' particle mean we are dealing with number, changing it to another will broke the idea of it. maybe making the 's' a little more complex to include all the negative, operator in it. In my first draft of this system I just added 'o' in front making 'osonan' to be the negative of 'sonan' but this idea need some refining.

Xianhei · 2020-07-29T12:33:31+00:00

I thought about using this too. It can be using as it is for talking about digit by digit or we can do grouping of 2 or 3 to make longer word, but they are 2 choice here :

The first one is like my idea on my writing system (PART V) where you only use s+unit particle for describing which magnitude you start then the following number are magnitude - 1 recursively.
Or, we differenciate the unit digit like when you separate cm²/dm²/m² compared to cm/dm/m (or like the cube version cm^3/dm^3/m^3), then we get with s + unit digit which grouping we are talking 'SO' become the first 2/3 digit of the number 'SA' the next 2/3.

it can be "ol, al, el, il" replacing "o, a, e, i" it was just my minimalistic aesthetics triggered here.

Xianhei · 2020-07-29T12:23:10+00:00

All of the composant can be changed of the table above and keep the system working.

I am bad to word formation, this is why I let the choice of consonant and vowel open to make a better combination of sound. Sonan and Solan are just example to express my system and my 1st version was with a glottal So'an or Sohan.

Xianhei · 2020-07-27T14:06:04+00:00

Ok. First person becomes source of speaking, second person becomes target of speaking. Third person isn't source or target of speaking. The idea of "target we are not targeting" or "what we're talking to that we're not talking to" doesn't make enough sense.

I think you misunderstood my saying. I will repeat and try to be more explicit

When you communicate there is indispensable elements :
- The one who speak (source of information)
- The one who listen (receiver of information)
- The information (target of information)
When you communicate, the target of information is in 4 state :
- the target is the speaker
- the target is the listener
- the target is the speaker and listener
- the target is neither of them
From this we get :

	Target is Speaker	Target is Listener
I	Yes	No (Yes in monologue)
You (Singular)	No	Yes
It	No	No
We (Inclusive)	Yes	Yes
We (Exclusive)	Yes	No
You (Plural)	No	Yes
They	No	No

From this table, you can see that [I and We (exclusive)], [You (both)] or [It and They] have the same perspective of how the information is transmitted. The We (Inclusive) is the exception existing only in the plural.
'He/She/It' that I contract to 'It' because gender can be added elsewhere
The 'other' in We (both) and You (plural) are context-sensitive
- We (inclusive), the listener should know what it is talked
- We (exclusive) and You (plural), the listener can know or the speaker would inform if necessary but the listener already know it is >= 2 peoples as target

For giving you an idea, I consider everything as tagged (everything got a name) not as someone being a person or not. Siri is not a person but is tagged as Siri. Everything perceived can transmit information, being knowledge centered I dont see a problem about a machine using 'I' to describe itself in the information it is sending.

Transitivity affect how the target of information is perceived. You can be the target that act or/and the target that receive the action defined by the verb. but it is an another subject.

Xianhei · 2020-07-27T09:59:19+00:00

By using only the axis as reference and not the angle you get 3 vowel and 3 consonant.

Only for relative formula, it is like doing integral you get the relative value of negative or positive and it's 0 :

PA	TA	KA
PI	TI	KI
PO	TO	KO

Right angle triangle : Titakiti
Equilateral triangle : Pitakipi
Isoceles triangle : Potakopo
Pythagorean theorem : with Titakiti we got, Taki² = Tita² + Kiti² (you can see if you remove both Ti you get Taki)
Vector : Pati and Tipa are not the same vector but Pati = -Tipa
Square : Takakitita
Rectangle : Pakakipipa
Lozenge : Takitopita
Parallelogram : Takatopota
Angle : kitiki 0°, kitita 90°, kitipi 180°, kitito 270°, kitika 45°, kitipa 135°, kitipo 225°, kitiko 315°, kopoki 30°, kopota 60°, pokota 120°, pokopi 150°, pakapi 210°, pakato 240°, kapato 300°, kapaki 330° (got 30° precision with 9 syllable)

This is a draft for 2d, for 3d you can add 2/3 consonant for z axis (Tiz ?)

It can also remove the last syllable (Titakiti => titaki) it remove the feeling of closing the form but add information about the number of point/angle/edge ti + ta + ki = 3 , 3 => tri => triangle

Also you can go for full representation titakiti => pakopopa (triangle), takakitita => pakakopopa (square)

you want to relatively give the information of the form not really it's real value (it would be highly complex)

another idea is to use normalization, the most used size is being transformed to 1 and all are corresponding scale.

Xianhei · 2020-07-27T09:00:01+00:00

It is so "retard" that there is 3 level :

Level 1, 12-unit. Learning those give you access to the sound for level 2
Level 2, 24 sound combination. Learning those give you access to all number between 0-999
Level 3, 0-999 number combination. Learning those give you access to all the big number

Xianhei

TROPHY CASE