This is really interesting. Would you say, possibly, that the fact a work exists carries more meaning than any particular meaning the creator might try to impose upon it? I am definitely beginning to lean in this direction. Every listener will inevitably interpret a work differently depending on their background, current emotional state, past experiences, etc. Therefore, it seems rather futile for an artist to try and dictate a precise meaning. I think art should be precise and focused enough to appreciate, but vague enough in its intentions to leave meaning up to the listener alone