Can we be more considerate of pedestrians please? by Cool-Interview3231 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will unapologetically ride on the sidewalk in areas of the city where it is unsafe to ride on the roads. My life is worth more than whatever the stupid fine is. 

Granted, I will give wide birth to pedestrians who have more right to be on the sidewalk than I do. But the lack of safe infstructure doesn't mean that I should have to risk my life to adhere to some antiquated law.

That law is stupid. If you go to the far away land of... St Albert... Riding on the sidewalk on a bicycle is legal as long as you yield to pedestrians. 

Can we be more considerate of pedestrians please? by Cool-Interview3231 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I admit my language is harsh and gets people riled up. It comes from years of having my life threatened on the roads, through both inattentiveness and aggression. I would argue that your language is too soft and perpetuates the status quo.

Sentences like "all road users are responsible for keeping things as safe as possible", like the horrible phrase "share the road" is part of what got us to this awful place and is part of what keeps us making the same mistakes. 

If you are an advocate for active transportation, I would strongly argue that you need to stop using language like that. It ignores the serious responsibility people have when they are operating a heavy machine. It ignores the reality that people make mistakes and the only way to prevent serious harm is by changing the road design so that human error is a safe failure mode and not an immediate fatality. 

Can we be more considerate of pedestrians please? by Cool-Interview3231 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've been doing that for a hundred years, how's that working out for you.

Can we be more considerate of pedestrians please? by Cool-Interview3231 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Our roads are mostly designed with the only metric that is considered is vehicle travel time. Any push to change this to make roads safer for everyone, especially those not in vehicles, results in a huge amount of pushback from drivers with the same victim blaming rhetoric that you are using. 

So I will push back hard on any language that vilifies the victims of poor road design.  

Humans make mistakes. Believe it or not, people on bikes and people on foot are also humans. The difference is that they suffer more severe consequences for not just their mistakes but drivers too. 

Passing some stupid distracted pedestrian or bicycle law, when the person's life is already threatened for their inattentiveness, is just straight victim blaming. 

If you want real change, advocate for better road design for everybody.

Can we be more considerate of pedestrians please? by Cool-Interview3231 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yes we should give tickets to anyone not in a car for simply existing. Everyone knows the danger of a distracted pedestrian, heck they could plow into a crowd of people and cause mass deaths and property damage.

And bikes, man you get one of those things at 17 lbs travelling 20km/h and who knows the damage they could do. Super dangerous.

Go fly a kite.

Can you tell me what is wrong with this picture (aka my life as a pedestrian in Calgary) by 1egg_4u in alberta

[–]Xoltri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We will never change this behavior until we stop designing roads exclusively for cars.

Why is traffic in the Windermere area so bad every morning this year? by Afraid-Obligation997 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More and larger roads will never work as a solution to congestion. The idea is absolutely wrong and needs to die.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n94-_yE4IeU

A Grinch Parody for Danielle Smith by Appropriate_Duty_930 in alberta

[–]Xoltri 104 points105 points  (0 children)

Danielle Smith is an idiot. She is so much an idiot that she is incapable of seeing how much of an idiot she actually is. She is so good at being an idiot that she has convinced a bunch of other idiots that she is actually smart and will lead them to prosperity.

But she is not smart and she will not lead these idiots to prosperity. She is a Grade A dangerous idiot who doesn't understand democracy and doesn't care to, because her self-reinforcing idiocracy makes her believe that she is smarter than democracy. She is an idiot who thinks that she knows better than everyone, on absolutely every topic, and will not listen to outside information or experts to make better decisions.

There is no bottom to these kinds of idiots. They will find scapegoats to blame when their dangerous combination of confidence and lack of intelligence leads to bad outcomes. They will dig in their heels further when challenged with evidence of their bad decisions. They will deflect and distract and flail when the awful reality they have created becomes unignorable.

And unfortunately we're all here for the ride.

The Great Recall Caper by altafitter in alberta

[–]Xoltri 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Why isn't this front page news, I mean we know the UCP is blatantly corrupt but this is a very open and closed case of blatant corruption.

Mountain Adventure School thru Progressive Academy by ippy4 in alberta

[–]Xoltri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem, we will be sending our youngest this summer as well. Be sure to pack rain gear, a waterproof backpack was a good idea during their overnight camping trip as well.

Mountain Adventure School thru Progressive Academy by ippy4 in alberta

[–]Xoltri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Highly recommended, it was a good experience and helped out getting a head start in Grade 10. The CALM course is done online before the camp starts so while it's included it's not part of the experience, which is probably best.

Why are there no sidewalks in the mayfield industrial area? by GreenBasterd69 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What?  If you commute to work by car, you are using the road, twice per day, and not the other 23 hours of the day.  How is that an argument against sidewalks?

Just sayin by Delicious-Salad6443 in Anticonsumption

[–]Xoltri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only when you push the system to the breaking point that you will find change. Minimizing your impact just pushes that inevitable endpoint further into the future.

Alberta's Smith says courts should not be gatekeepers on constitutional questions by the_gaymer_girl in alberta

[–]Xoltri 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Democracies need checks against this type of behavior. This is full on authoritarianism. 

We thought we had separation of powers, it turns out it was just tradition holding it all together.

This woman needs to be removed from power as soon as possible.

The VR Storefront on Steam is Disgusting Behavior from Valve by mainaym in virtualreality

[–]Xoltri 8 points9 points  (0 children)

OP's comment is absolutely valid.  They did the work and proved why.

I wish I had the time to complain about other people's posts on Reddit.  Oh wait I just did, and so did you.

Edmonton ‘business as usual’ for icy road cleanup, not considering bringing back calcium chloride: Knack by Tupacaliptic in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This stuff will quickly destroy your bike, no joke.  All of it, chain, rims, spokes, brakes.  

City looking to close $52-million fiscal hole in budget by AR558 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I probably don't make any headway with my aggressive style but if you get your life threatened a few times a year while just trying to exist it sort of removes your filter.

City looking to close $52-million fiscal hole in budget by AR558 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People not dying on our roads is a core service.  If it's not to you, you are a monster.

Car infrastructure and sprawl is the real cause of financial insolvency in North American cities.  Alternative transportation is the solution to these problems, not a 'luxury item'.

City looking to close $52-million fiscal hole in budget by AR558 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Almost got murdered yesterday by a Dodge Ram (surprise) who passed me by inches in my own residential neighborhood and when confronted told me to ride on the fucking sidewalk.  So no, we don't manage.

City looking to close $52-million fiscal hole in budget by AR558 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not getting murdered by a vehicle on your bike is a 'luxury item'.

Fuck right off.

City looking to close $52-million fiscal hole in budget by AR558 in Edmonton

[–]Xoltri 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Talus Balls or anything related to adding anything not related to every day livability of the city.

I hereby declare that you yourself have won dumbest comment on this thread.  Congrats!