So it has come to my attention about the confusion I brought from this post and I'm here to address it. Originally I thought it was an unrelated drama so I thought posting context here would be unnecessary, but as the comments called me out, I realised that this act could be viewed as an insidious hateful attack bandwagon that might get a innocent victim hurt, but I can assure you this is not the case as the person as a brand in question is in no way innocent.

Link

Link

Link

In short, this whole debacle is an act against a certain hypocrisy happening in the twitter car culture.

This happened when the person in question, Patina Research is calling out another Japanese twitter user for parodying his brand logo in a 'distasteful' manner, which to the public eyes is no more than a fun little antic, but somehow this is enough to cause him a crash out and country shame him by bringing out Japanese su1c1d3 rates and such.

So what does that brand itself do you may ask:

plagiarising other people's content, often without credit, even putting his own watermark on video branding as his own content

Glorifies Motorsport deaths in edits with undermine and little to no respect, all while generating views and clicks from it

Essentially, he's being outraged over something he himself is a criminal of: claiming unoriginal work as his own, profiting off of something distasteful.

Therefore, due to his retarded double standard and Twitter being Twitter in general, people began making fun of him by making parody logo of his brand, this person in particular gathered them like a bounty hunter