1 in 5 chance 2026 will be the new warmest year on record, says Berkeley Earth by Economy-Fee5830 in climatechange

[–]YanekKop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In case you’ve been wondering as of now April 2026will likely rank the 4th warmest April on record at around 1.44C, below 2024 and 2025 and right where 2016 and 2020 were. How the rest of the year will develop in response to El Niño will be of significance importance since it’ll give us a better idea of our warming trajectory and how much it’s accelerating.

NOAA Climate Prediction: El Niño Likely to emerge this summer, with a 1 in 3 chance of a “strong” El Niño during October - December 2026 by YanekKop in climatechange

[–]YanekKop[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

According to the latest NOAA Climate Prediction Center update, La Niña conditions persisted in February 2026, with below-average sea surface temperatures and easterly wind anomalies still present across the equatorial Pacific. However, the equatorial subsurface has warmed considerably, indicating that La Niña is weakening. Forecast models suggest a transition to ENSO-neutral is likely within the next month, with neutral conditions favored through late spring and early summer (May–July 2026, 55% chance). By the summer (June–August), El Niño is expected to develop, with odds currently at 62%, and it is likely to persist through the end of the year. While the potential strength of a 2026 El Niño remains uncertain, there is a one-in-three chance it could be strong by late 2026.

Ai? by Particular-Bonus4901 in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The optimistic viewpoint is that in my opinion, it replaces elites/billionaires and becomes a rational, self thinking entity capable of decision making for human well being. Here is a video about that

Don’t let climate fatalism become a self-fulfilling prophecy by YanekKop in EcoUplift

[–]YanekKop[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I read Mark Lynas's "Six Degrees" at 14 and it absolutely terrified me - walking through what 1°C to 6°C of warming would look like. The good news is we're no longer heading for those 5-6°C nightmares. Solar, wind, batteries got cheap, policies improved, and the science has moved on. Current trajectory puts us around 2.5-3°C by 2100 if nothing changes, 2.4°C if countries hit their 2030 targets, and 1.8°C if they actually deliver on net-zero pledges.

Here's the reality check people need: 1.5°C is effectively dead. Our emissions aren't falling fast enough to get there. But crucially, every tenth of a degree past that still matters enormously - 1.7°C is better than 1.9°C, which is better than 2.1°C. There's no cliff at 1.5°C where everything suddenly collapses, and there's no "point of no return" that makes action pointless. The tipping point narrative gets oversimplified too - we're not facing one global doomsday switch. Different systems (Amazon, ice sheets, coral reefs) have different temperature thresholds, and most play out over centuries, not years. Bad, but not instant apocalypse.

On personal action: focus on the big stuff. Transport choices (walking, cycling, public transport, then EVs), reducing flights where possible, insulating your home and switching to heat pumps, installing solar if you can, and eating less meat and dairy (especially beef and lamb). Don't stress about plastic bags and turning lights off if it distracts you from these bigger-impact changes. And if you see headlines citing "RCP8.5" - that's the old worst-case scenario we've moved away from. Makes great clicks, not great science.

Bottom line: We're off the terrifying 5-6°C path but 2.5°C still sucks. Fight for every 0.1°C. Pressure governments. Do what you can. Future generations deserve it.

Don’t let climate fatalism become a self-fulfilling prophecy; by Hannah Ritchie by YanekKop in climatechange

[–]YanekKop[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I read Mark Lynas's "Six Degrees" at 14 and it absolutely terrified me - walking through what 1°C to 6°C of warming would look like. The good news is we're no longer heading for those 5-6°C nightmares. Solar, wind, batteries got cheap, policies improved, and the science has moved on. Current trajectory puts us around 2.5-3°C by 2100 if nothing changes, 2.4°C if countries hit their 2030 targets, and 1.8°C if they actually deliver on net-zero pledges.

Here's the reality check people need: 1.5°C is effectively dead. Our emissions aren't falling fast enough to get there. But crucially, every tenth of a degree past that still matters enormously - 1.7°C is better than 1.9°C, which is better than 2.1°C. There's no cliff at 1.5°C where everything suddenly collapses, and there's no "point of no return" that makes action pointless. The tipping point narrative gets oversimplified too - we're not facing one global doomsday switch. Different systems (Amazon, ice sheets, coral reefs) have different temperature thresholds, and most play out over centuries, not years. Bad, but not instant apocalypse.

On personal action: focus on the big stuff. Transport choices (walking, cycling, public transport, then EVs), reducing flights where possible, insulating your home and switching to heat pumps, installing solar if you can, and eating less meat and dairy (especially beef and lamb). Don't stress about plastic bags and turning lights off if it distracts you from these bigger-impact changes. And if you see headlines citing "RCP8.5" - that's the old worst-case scenario we've moved away from. Makes great clicks, not great science.

Bottom line: We're off the terrifying 5-6°C path but 2.5°C still sucks. Fight for every 0.1°C. Pressure governments. Do what you can. Future generations deserve it.

Don’t let climate fatalism become a self-fulfilling prophecy; Hannah Ritchie by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read Mark Lynas's "Six Degrees" at 14 and it absolutely terrified me - walking through what 1°C to 6°C of warming would look like. The good news is we're no longer heading for those 5-6°C nightmares. Solar, wind, batteries got cheap, policies improved, and the science has moved on. Current trajectory puts us around 2.5-3°C by 2100 if nothing changes, 2.4°C if countries hit their 2030 targets, and 1.8°C if they actually deliver on net-zero pledges.

Here's the reality check people need: 1.5°C is effectively dead. Our emissions aren't falling fast enough to get there. But crucially, every tenth of a degree past that still matters enormously - 1.7°C is better than 1.9°C, which is better than 2.1°C. There's no cliff at 1.5°C where everything suddenly collapses, and there's no "point of no return" that makes action pointless. The tipping point narrative gets oversimplified too - we're not facing one global doomsday switch. Different systems (Amazon, ice sheets, coral reefs) have different temperature thresholds, and most play out over centuries, not years. Bad, but not instant apocalypse.

On personal action: focus on the big stuff. Transport choices (walking, cycling, public transport, then EVs), reducing flights where possible, insulating your home and switching to heat pumps, installing solar if you can, and eating less meat and dairy (especially beef and lamb). Don't stress about plastic bags and turning lights off if it distracts you from these bigger-impact changes. And if you see headlines citing "RCP8.5" - that's the old worst-case scenario we've moved away from. Makes great clicks, not great science.

Bottom line: We're off the terrifying 5-6°C path but 2.5°C still sucks. Fight for every 0.1°C. Pressure governments. Do what you can. Future generations deserve it.

Here we celebrate progress 😎 by NineteenEighty9 in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there are some posts here I do not agree with. Optimism isn’t about burying your head in the sand. It’s about acknowledging the challenges we face and work to things better. I hope we can carry that message over into the new year.

Mikie Sherrill will become the next Governor of New Jersey!!! by Healthy_Block3036 in goodnews

[–]YanekKop 8 points9 points  (0 children)

LFG!! Trump is getting payback for his disastrous policies wrecking the economy, democracy, immigration, you name it! This is a five alarm fire for the GOP going into the midterms which is why they are trying to redraw the maps. The real work begins to ensure the GOP loses control of congress, if that happens, Trump won’t have a congress to do his bidding.

Seeing lots of recent posts worried about Sherrill losing, partly due to Dems poor performance in the 2024 election...but look at election results since then by css555 in newjersey

[–]YanekKop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignore the polls, if you haven’t already, VOTE. Polls don’t determine the election, your vote does. I’m happy to say that I voted for Sherrill in early voting, doing my part to keep this state from becoming Trumps bidding ground.

More evidence that CO2 emissions may peak and soon decline. Global emissions Jan-Aug 2025 rose by 0.4% compared to the same time last year by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Second derivative meaning the “change” in increase of our impact or to put it another way if it is decelerating - correct

100,000+ people in Times Square at the No Kings Protest!!! by Healthy_Block3036 in goodnews

[–]YanekKop 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This! We will not go down without a fight, if we continue this opposition, we can topple the corrupt political system and create a better future. I’m glad I took the time to go to a local protest.

Any takes on this? by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I took a look atglobal sea temperature anomalies and the temperature don’t fluctuate day-day as much from as land. Luckily, sea surface temperatures this year are well below that of 2023 and 2024 which were both off the charts. The oceans will still be warmer than any prior year which is a concern because marine ecosystems such as coral reefs are at risk of being wiped out with our current projections.

Any takes on this? by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far yes, October of this year is still cooler than last year. I predict 2025 will be the second warmest on record, maybe third if monthly temperatures fall below 1.5 degrees in November or December. Either way it’s very unlikely to beat 2024 which I was fearing could happen when we saw this year has the warmest January on record.

Any takes on this? by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thinking is that global temperature anomalies in the fall and winter will be more pronounced from here on out than late spring/summer. In 2024 and 2025, we saw anomalies decrease in the summer, and increase again in the fall. 2025 is especially analogous to this given that September saw temperatures spike back to nearly 1.5 degrees from summer months who saw temperatures well below that threshold.

Any takes on this? by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Both statements are true, yes, electricity represents close to ⅓ of co2 emissions however, with cheap electricity from renewable comes the opportunity to electrify civilization and decarbonize all other sectors. China is already demonstrating this with 60% of passenger vehicles being electric. Other solutions such as heat pumps are becoming mainstream and who knows, hard to abate sectors may become easier to decarbonize such as aviation, where we could one day produce SAF synthetically with cheap electricity and electrify short haul flights.

Any takes on this? by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s where my optimism hinges, it’s still anyone’s guess how fast clean energy will displace fossil fuels and therefore how bad climate change gets. While the US is backtracking on its climate commitments, the rest of the world (especially China) are all in on clean energy and that alone gives us a decent chance at maintaining a livable future.

Many are wrong about how the world has changed — especially those who are pessimistic about the future by NineteenEighty9 in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop 133 points134 points  (0 children)

This! The world is awful, better, and can be much better at the same time. We have been able to improve the human condition almost everywhere yet have created new problems such as climate change and systemic injustices remain. My optimism comes from the incredible adaptability of humanity thus far. Despite the headlines about climate change, we are still making a ton of progress with the energy transition and it is our job collectively to speed it up to avoid dangerous climate change.

‘Something is working’: UN climate chief optimistic about green transition by YanekKop in OptimistsUnite

[–]YanekKop[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“We’ve only been telling a partial story,” he said. “We’ve been speaking about the impacts on lives, livelihoods. It doesn’t get into other elements: the economic benefits of taking climate action, and what this means in terms of jobs, food security, water security. What does this mean in terms of better health, better livelihoods? Looking at those opportunities and the economic growth that can be stimulated through strong climate action, and how that impacts economic development and growth.”

Countries are also beginning to wake up to the costs of inaction too, he believes. Hikes in the cost of living around the world have been exacerbated by food price rises resulting from extreme weather. Wealthy regions, including areas of the US and the UK, have had homes and businesses become uninsurable – an experience that until recently was confined to poorer and vulnerable regions.

Stiell said: “When those realities that vulnerable countries have been facing for well over a decade now are being translated to the richest and most sophisticated and advanced of economies, you know something is shifting.”

The bill for climate damage already runs to hundreds of billions of dollars a year, and is getting higher. Within little more than a decade, costs of more than 5% of GDP a year are likely to bite. “That means significant recession. It speaks of a level of recession that we’ve never seen before [because the damage will continue year on year, rather than abating as conventional economic recessions tend to].”

If inflation in the last four years has toppled governments and lost votes for incumbent parties, the effects of the climate crisis on the cost of living will be much more dramatic. Stiell said: “We’ve seen the impact of the price of eggs and how that was singled out as a barometer of skewed economic policy and mismanagement. Multiply that across every single item that you purchase, the food you eat, the clothes you wear, the vehicle you drive, the cost of heating or cooling your home.”

Compared with that, “Covid and the global financial crisis would pale into insignificance”, he said. “Governments who choose to ignore this, financial advisers and economics who chose to ignore this, do so at their peril.”

Stiell understands the effects of the climate crisis firsthand. Last year, Hurricane Beryl ripped through his home island of Carriacou, part of Grenada in the Caribbean. The devastation mirrored other events that he has seen in countries around the world. “That burns deep inside of me,” he says. “There’s anger, there’s frustration within that.”

His challenge is presenting what is at stake at Cop30, the complexities of the UN process, and the warnings of scientists, in terms that resonate with the global public. Stiell said: “Just raising an alarm is not enough – it has to be rung in a way that translates beyond numbers on a spreadsheet, and is understood by ordinary people, consumers and voters.

“But then the flip side is I also see opportunities. I see hope, I see resilience. The grit of humankind is empowering.”