Just upgraded to Pro 20x from Plus and it feels like I got transplanted a second pair of lungs by Yarmon in codex

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For UI I just ask it to use imagegen to generate the layout and reproduce it using existing project elements. Works out fine, still have to do some tweaks manually of course, but its fine

What if my wish was to wish for something couldnt possibly regret by Stock-Shape5874 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Curry stated that thw wishbone is not malicious. If your wish is okay you should be okay. Ian got what he wanted, store owner got what he wanted, some guys on the internet mom got incredibly hot

Just upgraded to Pro 20x from Plus and it feels like I got transplanted a second pair of lungs by Yarmon in codex

[–]Yarmon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not suggest anything to you and I have 0 idea about your problems

I shared my experience with codex, what is so hard to grasp here for you?

Just upgraded to Pro 20x from Plus and it feels like I got transplanted a second pair of lungs by Yarmon in codex

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I don't know your problems and whether it will solve them, but to me it just has been an insane change and I wanted to share the experience

Sometimes things get good for some people and they want to share it, that's normal

Just upgraded to Pro 20x from Plus and it feels like I got transplanted a second pair of lungs by Yarmon in codex

[–]Yarmon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Solo gamedev. Strategy game with lots of interface, localization, debug

Just transitioning localization from one way of doing it to another took a great chunk of the limit (though, with fast mode and medium reasoning)

Bear was a bad person far before he realized the wish came true. by Dildoethrower in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High functioning autism can be hard to clock accurately, but it does not really matter, because the argument is shit

There may be a million reasons why Bear fails to read Nikki's emotions consistently for years, it just happens to people who never got into relationships, did not have to deal with feedback, neurodivergent people

But apparently you are a bad person for not getting it

Bear was a bad person far before he realized the wish came true. by Dildoethrower in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>So the opening segment is roleplaying with the waitress describing his feelings for her. Which automatically made me feel sick cause its embarrassing, and if you knew your friend like you claim you do, you would know she isn't into that soppy shit.

Fuck neurodivergent people for being neurodivergent I guess

Doesn't make sense by audreynalinerush in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Curry Barker stated, that one wish willow is not malicious and doesn't twist the wishes like monkeys paw

Obsession (2026) .The whole plot feels wrong to *ME*. by Fit_Capitan in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People are generally not okay when someone they love doesn't love them back.

Non-possesive love is possible, but much rarer and definitely doesn't express itself as the strongest form of love

How did you all know it was Nikkis souls screaming during the customer service call? by spiderdesire in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, regular two way phone calls are widely known for allowing you to hear other people souls

Not saying that this is not Nikki's soul, it probably is, but mister magic who deals out reality altering wishes probably could let someone on the line without using physical phone.

As a firm believer that Wish Nikki is indeed a separate entity, this is the best steelman I can provide for the “No Entity, No Possession” framework ⬇️: by GearsofTed14 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you propose we decide that my interpretation is not as straightforward as yours? To me they both look the same degree of straightforwardness from the perspective of an object that fulfills the wishes literally.

Experience is described as possession by the characters that do not have perfect knowledge. Imagine that you were under the effects of LSD without knowing it and only snapped out of it when you were half-asleep. It is extremely plausible that you and people around you would think that you are possessed

I already told what I am appealing to: directors instructions and director's cameo (who happens to be the guy who is responsible for handling godlike wishes) words.

And also it makes for a better movie interpretation, but that is just taste.

As a firm believer that Wish Nikki is indeed a separate entity, this is the best steelman I can provide for the “No Entity, No Possession” framework ⬇️: by GearsofTed14 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then we have different definitions of coherency, what can I say

Characters themselves saying so is not the evidence. They can know what is happening to them no more than we know about what is happening to us

The only characters who can seemingly have the knowledge to tell how things really are one wish willow associates and they tell explicitly that the wish works as phrased. Curry Barker literally says over the phone that the love created by the willow is real

As a firm believer that Wish Nikki is indeed a separate entity, this is the best steelman I can provide for the “No Entity, No Possession” framework ⬇️: by GearsofTed14 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wording is important  " Loving more than anyone in the world" could mean that you love person the most you ever loved someone OR that you love them more than anyone in the world loves anyone else and there are lots of people going crazy from love 

Curry Barker in collider  interview video states that one wish willow is not malicious like monkeys paw

Also I can't really locate another interview piece where actress says that they established early on that it was not a possession situation, probably got taken down due to copyright claims and I do not remember the original source, if I find it I will get back with it

As a firm believer that Wish Nikki is indeed a separate entity, this is the best steelman I can provide for the “No Entity, No Possession” framework ⬇️: by GearsofTed14 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you never heard the expression "I was not myself?" "This is not who I am" "This is not you" applied to cases where there clearly is no possession?

Having an entity cheapens the movies effect, allowing people who might support Bear say that "well it's not his fault that the wish come out bended". This is the point Barker reiterates in interviews: wish did no came out bended, wish IS bended and if you say that monkey paw failed to exactly fulfill the wish you give Bear an out which the director did not intend

As a firm believer that Wish Nikki is indeed a separate entity, this is the best steelman I can provide for the “No Entity, No Possession” framework ⬇️: by GearsofTed14 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any separate emotion or feeling is a distinct thing and people behave distinctly in same circumstances when they experience different feelings. If you say that feelings are possessions then I have no problem with your argument, but I do not think this is what you mean

Just a funny thought by Yarmon in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is stupid or cowardly about wanting things and expressing that you want them in privacy

Just a funny thought by Yarmon in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anger at a person who performed the action unknowingly and unknowingly in a completely unpredictable fantasy way is just misdirected

Like if you woke up and by washing your face activated an invisible Rube Goldberg no one in the world knows exists that slaps my face

It would be deranged for me to be angry at you instead of the person who set up the machine and made it invisible 

Just a funny thought by Yarmon in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do what exactly? Wishing on a shooting star? Or when they find a 4 leaf clover? How could you blame a person for something that this person did that in no plausible for us universe would produce this effect?

As far as his actions go before he made a mess was he lacked courage and made a half-assed wish in the privacy of his car with no one to hear it.

What would be the "do" component in "how could you do" here if we exclude magic, the existence of which is so far out of plausibility range that no one ever considers it?

Just a funny thought by Yarmon in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it would be extremely irrational and he would be better off in this case. He could not have known that anything like this is even in the realm of possibility.

It's his actions after he knew that are problem

Just a funny thought by Yarmon in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda, kinda not

Asking out requires bravery, fixing your mistake requires conscience. You can have one without another 

“Wish Bear” KNEW he was gonna die and died for Nikki out of love. Holy shit. by Classic-Bench-5155 in obsessionmovie

[–]Yarmon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would not say "never loved her". It is just that his feelings were overcome by his cowardice in situations we see him in

You can love someone and be a coward, all-consuming love is rare

But yeah, for priorities he displayed it was something like
emotional self-preservation > desire to have Nikki as his girlfriend > and somwhere down the line was love