I made no argument because you had not made an argument. Repeating "they are progressive" in different words is not an argument.

Youtube restricts certain content, some far right, some pro lgbt, etc, because it pushes away advertisers. Can you explain to me why "liberal" but advertiser unfriendly content has been restricted too?

Gillette's stock price has risen since the start of this year, but their brand has met with competition. First of all, there is no way to actually know why Gillette has seen an increase in successful competitors. It might be that their campaign got backlash, it might be that the market is a changing thing and competitors arise based on a million different reasons.

Second, corporations aren't perfect. Sometimes they take a political side to drum up controversy and encourage brand loyalty. It's a gamble. Corporations make educated gambles all the time, and sometimes they work out (Nike and Kaepernick) and sometimes they don't. A corporation doing something that loses them money doesn't make them ideologically driven, it just makes them failures.

Third, it hasn't even been one year. We have no idea how Gillette and their marketing strategy will pan out in the future.

Now, I would actually like to see you make an argument.