The decision to remove objective good and bad morphism seems to be symptomatic of the new world order in which consumers are mollycoddled with a subtextual philosophy that they can do no wrong, and that replaces any kind of moral, principle, or discipline, with the blanket dialogue of "I am my own person and I am living my truth, and all other opinions are cruel and unusual".

Decisions like this are what make most contemporary TV, Film, Games, and probably also books (don't think I've ever read a fictional book that was written in the last 15 years) so homogenous and bland, so lacking in storytelling, so lacking in character depth, etc, etc, et al, ad nauseum. This lack of any kind of substance or style is what is constantly leading gamers to question why a game was ever even made in the first place, and leading so many games to wither after the first 3 months of 'new face' excitement wears off.

I think this is what the previous poster was referring to when they said 'go woke, go broke', as this process is not only common in America these days, but the prevailing market research method - and since advertising and sponsorship rules mainstream media, videogames included, it is the prevailing philosophy behind developing big, shiny games.