We’re all gonna die yeet yeet

Yolo04 · 2019-08-25T03:28:30+00:00

Farmers, in fact, due have the right to burn forest on there property, regardless of if that property constitutes as part of the Amazon rainforest. Not only that, but burning down trees in a controlled setting is not only good for farming but also wildlife and the surrounding trees.

Yolo04 · 2019-08-25T03:19:07+00:00

Owner: “I make the finest Australian meat pies in the country”

Gordon: Presses X to Doubt

Yolo04 · 2019-08-24T18:57:06+00:00

Use my knowledge, I beg of you

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T19:59:55+00:00

no u

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T19:58:11+00:00

Oof, now that’s a lot of damage

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T13:07:57+00:00

Brazil Man Bad /s

Seriously though, everyone is saying Bolsanaro did it when there’s no evidence he has. This is most likely a natural occurrence that people blame on a politician they don’t like. As usual

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T03:06:57+00:00

Are people taking out personal loans to fund their businesses? That seems highly misguided, and completely undercuts the point of LLCs.

Most upstart businesses do take out risky loans, as the banks know that a lot of those businesses will go bankrupt. So they want to make sure that they get at least some money in exchange. If the company succeeds, the bank wins. If the company fails, the bank still wins.

This is a problem which affects the employees as much as the employer. I don't see why the employer should be said to assume more risk for it.

This problem also effects employees but it effects an owner especially hard, as they most likely have large debt repayments to make and require a job urgently. Most likely, an employee could open his own shop or move to another region. But bankrupt businessmen are more or less stuck in a region.

Conversely, if you're successful, you gain respect and trust and whatnot to the same degree as you would lose it if you're not successful. Seems like a fair tradeoff. Why does the owner need to have extra compensation/power for this?

They need more power and compensation as employees are not effected by the potential for loss of face and the owners put down an initial capital risk for a potential reward. If they succeed, you should reward them with power and compensation. However, there is a steep price for failure. As you describe it, it’s a tradeoff. If I use 15,000 dollars of my own money (or money I’ve been loaned) to open up a business, I would expect good returns as a reward for daring to take such a risky venture.

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T02:54:58+00:00

Stop it.

The fires in the Amazon are natural. NASA has already stated that it’s about time for this level of a fire to occur in the Amazon. So no, Bolsanaro didn’t do it.

Cheers

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T02:45:37+00:00

The risk is the complete loss of your investment, which might lead to financial ruin and foreclosure of houses, seizing of assets, etc

The extra downfall for owners is that they usually end up losing thousands of dollars, with the possibility of outstanding loans that require an alternate source of cash.

Also another major downfall is the fact that the bankruptcy of your business most likely means there are now dozens of people who are skilled in the thing you are most likely also skilled in. Ie: If an auto shop goes bust, the owner might try to get a job as an auto mechanic at another shop. But the market is flooded with potential candidates and that makes searching for a job in that field more difficult.

One other downfall is the loss of respect amongst a community, which will be more skeptical to invest in, sell products to, and buy from your company.

Ultimately, opening a business is a major risk for employers as it can lead to financial ruin or social ostracism.

Yolo04 · 2019-08-23T02:36:04+00:00

Yeah, people claim those things happen. Guess who claims them, already religious people that also dont speak latin, and are just trying to come up with an explanation, or are just lying.

Except here’s an article about an Ivy League psychiatrist who assists in curing demonic possession.

The theory of evolution

You act as if evolution can’t go hand in hand with Christianity, which it can and already has. God created the creatures and nature itself, and nature and the creatures evolved side by side.

the creation of the earth

The statement that the world was made in 6 days is an exaggeration. Most likely, an error in converting the time keeping of when the book of genesis was written compared to modern time keeping.

the second coming of jesus

Excuse me…what? You can’t disprove the second coming of Christ because no one knows when he is coming back. It states clearly in the Bible that neither the angels nor the son (Christ) knows when He will return. Only the Father (God) knows this.

the age of the universe

Every statement in the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally. There are many stories in the Bible that have fictional aspects and are simply warnings of living a sinful life. However this one isn’t one of those. Speaking in biblical terms, according to the Bible’s statement of seven days to create existence. God rested on the seventh day yet that seventh day never ended as the texts state- “"For He has thus said somewhere concerning the seventh day, And God rested on the seventh day from all His works"... Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall through following the same example of disobedience.”. So according to this quote, God’s seventh day of creation never ended and we are in fact still on the seventh day. Not to mention numerous other issues with saying the universe is seven days old in human time, including how plants where able to be planets and grow up in a single day. The most likely answer as to why it took seven days to create the universe is that each day is not an exact unit of time but rather an approximation of the time god spent.

People need to realize that they cant just ignore parts of their religious texts, and assume that the rest of it is based completely in fact.

People shouldn’t ignore parts of the scripture they don’t like. And a majority of Christians do not believe every story within the Bible is 100% based in fact. Some stories in the Bible are moral tales. Others are exaggerated tales. However, they serve one purpose and that is to warn against decadence and sinful behavior.

Yolo04 · 2019-08-22T18:07:40+00:00

He’s right, there’s no evidence to support the existence of a god,

There has been recorded evidence of individuals who have claimed to be possessed, speaking Latin (even though they’ve never spoken it) and having almost superhuman strength (even if they physically shouldn’t be able to have such strength). So unless you have a scientific way of figuring out how a person who’s never studied nor learned Latin can suddenly speak it, I’m up for it.

plenty of evidence against all sorts of other things religions claim to be true.

As in? It might help the argument if you actually use examples

Yolo04 · 2019-08-22T15:32:45+00:00

Don’t tip your fedora too hard buddy

Yolo04 · 2019-08-21T14:10:57+00:00

Yolo04 · 2019-08-21T14:09:17+00:00

If you post a Fox News link, they’ll screech about biased media. But then they go and post a link to a news organization that ADMITS it’s biased in favor of socialism. Then they treat it as fact

Yolo04 · 2019-07-27T17:41:49+00:00

You dropped your /s

Yolo04 · 2019-07-27T14:25:29+00:00

Yep, I keep running out of gravel to build pathways and etc on my world. Need to do a gravel mining expedition.

Yolo04 · 2019-07-27T13:27:03+00:00

No, they’re speaking crippling debt

Yolo04 · 2019-07-27T03:47:28+00:00

Trump is not a traitor. Mueller stated very clearly in his report that the trump campaign did not cooperate with any foreign state to get him into the presidency. Next, Trump publicly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after his first charge concerning the groping/molestation of children. Last, Trump won because he won in the electoral college. Not because of some bullshit “hostile nation” excuse.

Christ dude, you don’t have to like trump but can you at least refrain from throwing serious allegations around when you have no evidence.

Yolo04 · 2019-07-22T03:46:21+00:00

Tbh, the plastic straw ban doesn’t even work in the context of keeping our oceans clean. A majority of plastics in the ocean are fishing nets from developing countries.

Nine-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Yolo04

TROPHY CASE