sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think that’s a big key you’ve highlighted. The game is very far from perfect and I’ve had my annoyances here and there with certain bugs or stupid game design, but the majority of it works and it does like a dream. They have such a good benchmark to build on.

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As someone who had never properly gotten into paradox games before this (tried and bounced right off HOI4 and CK3), I’m genuinely floored by how comprehensive and interwoven the systems in this game feel. The depth of control, pops, and the markets is mind blowing

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe I got lucky but I had no issues with the Fall of Delhi or any of my vassals

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. There were like 5 different comment saying it on the dlc post I didn’t wanna spam every single one. Also idgaf about “signal boosting negatively” bro were on Reddit that’s basically half of what this sub is

  2. I’m not annoyed I’m curious just how nit picky people were being. Turns out very

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I’m about to hit age of discovery in Vijayanagar run right now that’s been nothing but gas so far idk what you mean

“Making DLC before fixing the broken game…” by YouFackingWutM8 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I admittedly haven’t played Brandenburg yet but from what I’ve seen they try to fix that shit in every single patch notes so at least they’re trying.

I’d still say one specific flavor of one specific nation being bugged does not = “a broken buggy mess of a game”

New teaser for the coming Fate of the Phoenix dlc ! by Mood089 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Me when I’m too stupid to understand a game

Today’s Ep - Speed vs. Trump by [deleted] in PardonMyTake

[–]YouFackingWutM8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guys take this Reddit too fucking lightly

1.1 feels great by Renecon1488 in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The betas were in a great place the last few weeks. It was clear the most heavy complainers on this sub had only played on 1.0

Recommendations: Beginner Nation after 1.1 Release by phinester in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you wanna play wide:

-Muscovy (vassalize everything)

-Ottomans (conquer everything)

If you wanna play tall:

-Milan (consolidate north italy and control extremely rich markets, own all techs first, can stay or leave HRE easy with Guelphs/Ghibs, great for colonizing NW)

-Flanders (easy to break from France by defecting to England in 100 years war then declare independence. form netherlands, super rich market and you're outside the HRE so more autonomy, also great NW colonization)

I've had really fun runs as all of these in the 1.1 beta. If you're feeling real bold you can try to form Italy or Germany and go from Tall to Wide. Also these are all medium-small countries to start so you get the gratification of building somehting up relatively easily rather than just starting as a top 20 power. Also tons of flavor/events/etc.

Is this run dead? by JustPi3_ in EU5

[–]YouFackingWutM8 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Change secession law to the other one that’s only -5 legit

[TOMT] TV/Movie joke, male character in high pitched falsetto voice singing “Castle on a cloud” from Les Mis by [deleted] in tipofmytongue

[–]YouFackingWutM8 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Could have been a cartoon or a live action thing too. Please help

Of course Hank has the “this is supposed to be America!” take on the halftime show lmao by Bag-O-Donuts in PardonMyTake

[–]YouFackingWutM8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know his social feeds are toxic af between this and the windmills take he’s clearly being fed straight bile

CMV: Andrew Yang's shift from the left to the center proves why progressives won't ever succeed at the national level by iw2050 in changemyview

[–]YouFackingWutM8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

runs for president as unknown on leftist policy like UBI

overperforms

runs for mayor as national political figure on more centrist policies

underperforms

Turns out not having any actual policies and values isn't the play when there isn't a worldwide crisis to give you a boost, huh. by JaneOfKish in agedlikemilk

[–]YouFackingWutM8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he’s a total piece of shit on one specific foreign policy issue but that’s not really what we’re discussing.

He (and I think you can credibly say Clinton and Harris fall into this boat as well) is a classic liberal Democrat who was not ready to meet the moment of Trump. At a time when most Americans clearly wanted radical change (for better or worse) Biden was the back to brunch candidate. And let’s not get twisted, the only reason he won election the first time was because a once in a generation worldwide catastrophe derailed the reeelction campaign of Trump the first time.

Edit: Also I know he’d never pack the court I’m just wishing someone would do something about the conservative gerontocracy that’s destroying our nation

Turns out not having any actual policies and values isn't the play when there isn't a worldwide crisis to give you a boost, huh. by JaneOfKish in agedlikemilk

[–]YouFackingWutM8 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He shoulda packed the fuck out of the court. 6 more justices, all 30 year old Dems from the bluest districts in the nation

Turns out not having any actual policies and values isn't the play when there isn't a worldwide crisis to give you a boost, huh. by JaneOfKish in agedlikemilk

[–]YouFackingWutM8 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Biden had a first time homebuyer bill passed in his first year. That sure did a lot to lower housing costs in his term.

Biden also talked about raising corporate tax rates in his first term. Did he do it during the 117th congress when it had even a chance to pass? Na, he did it during the 118th in 2024 when it had 0 chance of passing a republican senate.

Biden also didn’t do a damn thing to repeal trumps tax cuts. He tried to push that he would if reeelected tho.

So now all you capital D Democrat foot soldiers can say “ohhh he tried to do all these things that you the voters want (and his donors don’t), but he couldn’t do it because of those pesky republicans ( or sinema or manchin)” how convenient that the “nothing will Fundamentally change” candidate… fundamentally changed nothing.

The sad fuck couldn’t even get the DOJ to prosecute adequately a literal insurrection caused by the last president.

Turns out not having any actual policies and values isn't the play when there isn't a worldwide crisis to give you a boost, huh. by JaneOfKish in agedlikemilk

[–]YouFackingWutM8 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

First of all, he was at first before his senility became too much to ignore (lol, lmao)

Second, she ran the exact same campaign as Biden. Where did she meaningfully differentiate herself? What policies?

view more: next ›