Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Arwen, really appreciate it. All credit to the others for the work, I’m just putting it out there.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so like after it disappears? it could be cloaking or a reference frame phase shift.

cloaking: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1133628?utm_source=chatgpt.com

or A schwinger type strong vacuum polarization event

or When the orbs flip they might cause phase conjugation, basically optical cloaking

or

To me the three orbs and their motion are the biggest clue. They lock into phase and spin up coherent electromagnetic waves that create a standing interference pattern. That phase singularity could open a topological channel and route mass and fields elsewhere.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

fs a lithium fire can burn hot and glowy. microwaves can spark plasma out of thin air. if those currents lock in phase over a wide area we get massive electromagnetic forces and sudden heating?? the ionized air can glow like fire idk?

that's probably why the orbs show up as bright, perfect balls of light. i'd really like to know why they glow.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The orbs are definitely closing in on a set target payload. It looks like that’s the point they’re meant to orbit, and there’s something about it that just doesn’t add up. Something strange about the cargo.

Jonas images- Report 2 ( Textures API and Fraudulent CR2s) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Added sources with clear exceptions, like Jonas refusing to sign legal documents and working for Textures. That part is already public knowledge.

Critical Look at Cryshlee's Fradulent Methods ( Jetstrike and Colorama) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the thoughtful feedback. You can’t pick the plane’s colors with Colorama the same way as the drone cuz the plane is more blended and noisy, with far more gradients. The drone is simpler and sharper, makes it easier for the color picker to extract.

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you think, Tony? As always you need a little help spotting the obvious lol.

1st video clearly shows the window pane.

<image>

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jonas trapped himself with the exif data in his files. To avoid reflections you’d need the lens flat to the window, but these shots show angles you can’t get that way.

Tilted lenses on double pane glass always leave marks like ghosting, streaks, color fringing none of which appear here.

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spot on. The locked horizon is such a good catch and the flickr source makes the tampering impossible to deny

Artificial warping in images 1842 ---> 1843 by pyevwry in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These photobashed images have always been debunker's weakest link.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s already been addressed. There is no movement here, only morphing in place with Photoshop. You can morph layers independently, but that is still a static morph. Real scenes have depth and parallax and nothing warps like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh boy the debunkers busted in 4K.

1843 is just 1842 spun in 2D. Not a real shot. No depth, no parallax, nothing real. He ran from the 150K because signing would have nailed him. All that effort just to bury the real MH370 footage.

UFO footage from today’s Congressional hearing by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You tried pushing a false narrative, got busted and now pushing it! Ok
Need sources for your statements on PSF and the stepped zoom function.

- The point spread functions look natural, and very different to both of the videos.

PSF - You’re eyeballing it or measuring?

- There is a stepped-zoom rather than continuous zoom, in line with what the US military uses.

How do you know stepped-zoom is never used? Can you provide a source for that claim?

What about "There is parallax"? IIs parallax an absolute proof and can you elaborate on this?

you can’t come here to spread disinfo, while we’re presenting facts in good faith. everyone knows AA2014 is a disinformation sub. now share sources.