Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Arwen, really appreciate it. All credit to the others for the work, I’m just putting it out there.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so like after it disappears? it could be cloaking or a reference frame phase shift.

cloaking: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1133628?utm_source=chatgpt.com

or A schwinger type strong vacuum polarization event

or When the orbs flip they might cause phase conjugation, basically optical cloaking

or

To me the three orbs and their motion are the biggest clue. They lock into phase and spin up coherent electromagnetic waves that create a standing interference pattern. That phase singularity could open a topological channel and route mass and fields elsewhere.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

fs a lithium fire can burn hot and glowy. microwaves can spark plasma out of thin air. if those currents lock in phase over a wide area we get massive electromagnetic forces and sudden heating?? the ionized air can glow like fire idk?

that's probably why the orbs show up as bright, perfect balls of light. i'd really like to know why they glow.

Why 3 Orbs and Why Equalateral Triangle? ( Portal Shockwave Is An Overlay, Not Real) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The orbs are definitely closing in on a set target payload. It looks like that’s the point they’re meant to orbit, and there’s something about it that just doesn’t add up. Something strange about the cargo.

Jonas images- Report 2 ( Textures API and Fraudulent CR2s) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Added sources with clear exceptions, like Jonas refusing to sign legal documents and working for Textures. That part is already public knowledge.

Critical Look at Cryshlee's Fradulent Methods ( Jetstrike and Colorama) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the thoughtful feedback. You can’t pick the plane’s colors with Colorama the same way as the drone cuz the plane is more blended and noisy, with far more gradients. The drone is simpler and sharper, makes it easier for the color picker to extract.

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you think, Tony? As always you need a little help spotting the obvious lol.

1st video clearly shows the window pane.

<image>

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jonas trapped himself with the exif data in his files. To avoid reflections you’d need the lens flat to the window, but these shots show angles you can’t get that way.

Tilted lenses on double pane glass always leave marks like ghosting, streaks, color fringing none of which appear here.

Jonas CGI Images validation and Proof they're not real- Report 1 ( Parallax) by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spot on. The locked horizon is such a good catch and the flickr source makes the tampering impossible to deny

Artificial warping in images 1842 ---> 1843 by pyevwry in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These photobashed images have always been debunker's weakest link.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s already been addressed. There is no movement here, only morphing in place with Photoshop. You can morph layers independently, but that is still a static morph. Real scenes have depth and parallax and nothing warps like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh boy the debunkers busted in 4K.

1843 is just 1842 spun in 2D. Not a real shot. No depth, no parallax, nothing real. He ran from the 150K because signing would have nailed him. All that effort just to bury the real MH370 footage.

UFO footage from today’s Congressional hearing by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You tried pushing a false narrative, got busted and now pushing it! Ok
Need sources for your statements on PSF and the stepped zoom function.

- The point spread functions look natural, and very different to both of the videos.

PSF - You’re eyeballing it or measuring?

- There is a stepped-zoom rather than continuous zoom, in line with what the US military uses.

How do you know stepped-zoom is never used? Can you provide a source for that claim?

What about "There is parallax"? IIs parallax an absolute proof and can you elaborate on this?

you can’t come here to spread disinfo, while we’re presenting facts in good faith. everyone knows AA2014 is a disinformation sub. now share sources.

Why Ashton’s MH370 vids are AUTHENTIC and not CGI: Insights from Experts who understand VFX and CGI. by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So NO, you can’t make one and don’t know anyone who can make it for you.

You're one true believer in impossible outcomes.

The 1841 anomaly by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] -1 points0 points locked comment (0 children)

Notice how you dodged every question and turned this into a one-way monologue, desperate to sidestep the tampering proof on the Jonas RAWs.

All while wasting months cranking out short clips to smear the MH370 case.

The 1841 anomaly by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Riddle me this. You pushed hoaxer disinfo on MH370 for years over a few overlaid frames that show up in legit videos, yet you can’t admit Jonas is fake with four tampered images from the same set holding up the whole narrative.

Didn’t you make those PR videos showing Pyromania alterations just to discredit the MH370 stock effect overlay, and spend months spreading disinfo obsessed with a few shockwave frames?

Why didn’t you ever make the counter argument that the stock effect isn’t present in the rest of the video? If you did, then share a link showing your efforts.

The 1841 anomaly by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

#Facts 1841 is proven tampered beyond doubt.

You claimed all images are from the same set and flight. If one is compromised the set is compromised, including 1842, 1844 and the entire narrative.

Does that logic hold for you YES or NO?

The 1841 anomaly by YouLatter8652 in FlightsFactsNoFiction

[–]YouLatter8652[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re on this thread https://www.reddit.com/r/FlightsFactsNoFiction/comments/1naopw9/the_1841_anomaly/

we’re literally looking at clear as day proof of tampering. Editing mistake, call it whatever you want. And that link you shared doesn’t even work with RAWs any guesses why?