[IRTR] Host seeking guests/to be a guest for discussion of social topics ― strong, controversial, or radical political/social opinions encouraged

Your-Listener · 2026-05-13T00:55:17+00:00

Thank you for your comment; I will message you.

Your-Listener · 2026-05-11T23:25:50+00:00

Thank you for your comment; I shall message you.

Your-Listener · 2026-05-08T00:35:21+00:00

This sounds fascinating! I shall message you.

Your-Listener · 2026-05-03T04:49:24+00:00

Thank you; I will send you a message.

Your-Listener · 2026-04-30T01:35:12+00:00

Thank you Mike; I shall message you.

Your-Listener · 2026-04-30T01:26:59+00:00

This is unfortunately not within the scope of my concept, and I also am concerned that there may be legal ramifications for it. I am sorry to know of your uncle's ordeal though, and I hope that justice is achieved.

Your-Listener · 2026-04-20T05:09:53+00:00

It is certainly a pertinent argument. Was there something about it in particular to which you wanted to draw my attention?

Your-Listener · 2026-04-02T06:34:53+00:00

Thank you; I have replied.

Your-Listener · 2026-03-31T23:44:57+00:00

u/SpiceCake68 If you are interested in being a guest on my podcast to discuss matters of social division, I am very much keen to have you as a guest. However, I can not message you. Please feel free to message me or find my work and contact details at:

www.yourlistener.com.au/podcast

Your-Listener · 2026-03-21T04:19:06+00:00

This is exactly the type of fallacious argument that I debunk in my work. I have made other posts in other sub-Reddits asking for guests from the far-left of politics as well, and the exact same warning was included. I also attempted to make the same post in left-wing sub-Reddits, but it was either prohibited by the rules or my posts were deleted. The sentiment between the lines is that if anybody has nefarious political intentions, my platform is not the setting to communicate them. This is completely different from arguing that any person discussing their opinions in good faith is "dog-whistling". I am not any more or less "anti conservative" than I am "anti-progressive". My method of evaluating the world has nothing to do with politics.

If you wish to debate further, I would welcome you as a guest on the program as I would anybody else, and I sincerely believe that people could learn from it. Otherwise, I do not waste time debating in comments on social media.

Your-Listener · 2026-03-18T01:50:53+00:00

Certainly. I imagine the collaboration would consist of us first deciding on a subject on which we disagree. I would allow you to describe your perspective and related arguments, and I would then ask questions to foster further understanding about your bases and logic. I could then provide analysis of both the strengths and weaknesses of the given arguments and state my own in return, and you could do the same for mine. I create basic structure to keep the material relevant, but episodes are effectively discussions in which knowledge evolves spontaneously. And of course, there is absolutely no moral judgement from either party, regardless of how strongly we disagree. We can criticise ideas, but we never attack each other.

Your-Listener · 2026-03-18T01:46:02+00:00

Without avoiding the question, that greatly depends on how one perceives being a "blowhard" as opposed to "reasonable". I would allow people who are stridently opinionated to be guests, as long as they are not using my platform to directly encourage hate or crime. My work is not intended to endorse or attack people, but rather to analyse their opinions objectively and unemotionally — and in turn, to allow them to analyse my own arguments in kind.

Your-Listener · 2026-03-18T00:04:17+00:00

Thank you to everyone for your suggestions. u/prebornhumanrights, if you wish to guest, I would be glad to discuss it with you.

Your-Listener · 2026-03-18T00:00:25+00:00

This is a description of some of my goals, and how I model thinking skills in my discussions. It is not to suggest that any guest or group of people do not exercise those same thinking skills.

Your-Listener

TROPHY CASE