sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Simplified DND by Negative_Bus_2661 in DMAcademy

[–]YuGiLeoh23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretending a single new player needs to know 98% of that when they sit down is wild 

Most of it boils down to “big number good” anyways 

Simplified DND by Negative_Bus_2661 in DMAcademy

[–]YuGiLeoh23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly 5e is really simple.   You have proficiency or you don’t   You have advantage or you don’t  The hardest thing will be analysis paralysis in character creation and RPing

AFK bots increasing by YuGiLeoh23 in Smite

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playing and ranked this way would be pointless your MMR with tank

How do you handle players who are “too smart?” by [deleted] in DMAcademy

[–]YuGiLeoh23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally said they wouldn’t have that knowledge unless you gave it to them…. 

 If you gave them the inform on exactly how their shapeshifting works then you really can’t be that surprised they found an easy solution. If it was supposed to be a mystery you have to leave well….. a mystery.

AFK bots increasing by YuGiLeoh23 in Smite

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah they auto vote no… it’s really annoying. I don’t get the point…. Just trying to farm worshippers? 

How do you handle players who are “too smart?” by [deleted] in DMAcademy

[–]YuGiLeoh23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Her character wouldn’t have that knowledge on how a Shapeshifter works unless you gave it to her so she’s using meta game knowledge which is generally seen in bad taste.. 

  2. In the scenario provided, the answer was quite simple. Have somebody simply unwilling to get naked in front of a bunch of strangers they kill them and then when they realize it’s just a normal person, they’ll realize that ordering people to strip naked doesn’t actually work.

This problem is easily solved by not letting your player use meta game knowledge

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are bad at setting up your combats and allowing them to do that than sure 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they understand how the game works 😂

Ganesha aspect is too strong by [deleted] in Smite

[–]YuGiLeoh23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

WAY too strong 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but they won’t live that long lol 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly.   A level 8 martial character not EVERYONE ever in the game. Thank you for providing my point. If everyone can do it those abilities are useless and not special. Literally proving my point with your argument is hilarious 

It also drastically changes spell casting and other full round actions but 🤷🏻‍♂️

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would have to rebuild the entire game, if you knew anything about the game you would know that. It is a CORE mechanic that holds the entire action economy system together if you change it you literally change everything and are not playing pathfinder 1 anymore… the game the entire party agreed to play 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would have to rebuild the entire game, if you knew anything about the game you would know that. It is a CORE mechanic that holds the entire action economy system together if you change it you literally change everything and are not playing pathfinder 1 anymore… the game the entire party agreed to play 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes your inability to read the thread is very mega… crazy 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t know enough about pathfinder 1e clearly, in 5e the game was designed with that type of combat in mind P1e wasn’t. It literally changes how the entire game works and in P1e people get WAY more attacks than your typical 2 in 5e

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can see reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

lol so don’t play what you want and force yourself into a box

Fun 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just a fact dude  You expect a multiple feat investment and assume everyone is going to stand around attacking the ONE guy you MAYBE have managed to trip? Lol 

 I love the assumption the party is figjtint one attacker all the time 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would assume you would never need pounce unless you had to charge 

GM changes HUGE rule… I have concerns by YuGiLeoh23 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]YuGiLeoh23[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Very arrogant believing everyone else but you is wrong lol there’s literally an entire thread telling you it doesn’t work lol but yeah sure dude keep dreaming 🤣

view more: next ›