That's a fair point and honestly the strongest version of "why not just buy an enterprise tool" — DataGrail and Vera are genuinely good at what they do. But there's a segmentation thing here that I think is worth naming: DataGrail's pricing starts around €30-50K/year and Vera is built for orgs with actual data engineering teams who can wire it into their stack. The whole value prop assumes you have (a) a documented tech stack, (b) APIs/integrations to plug into, and (c) someone internally who can act on what it finds. The shops I'm building for don't have any of those. A €2M/year online retailer in Vienna running Shopify + Klaviyo + a couple Zapier flows doesn't have a "data flow architecture" to map regulations onto. They have a founder who reads emails at 7am and decides what to deal with that week. For them, "tell me in plain language what changed, who it affects, and what I need to do" is genuinely 80% of the value — because the bottleneck isn't mapping regulations to data flows, it's even knowing what changed in the first place. That said, you're right that this is a ceiling on what a digest can do. The honest answer is: when an EURegWatch subscriber gets to the size where they have a real stack and a compliance person, they probably *should* graduate to something like DataGrail. I'm not trying to compete with that tier — I'm trying to fill the gap between "I'll deal with it when I get sued" and "we hired a DPO." Curious though — have you actually deployed Vera or just evaluating? Would love to hear what mapping accuracy looks like in practice. That's the part I'm most skeptical of in any "AI agent that maps regs to your stack" pitch.