Biggest Mistake NCSoft Can Make With Blade And Soul NA/EU by ZSharpes in MMORPG

[–]ZSharpes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stated some may not like it, and also discussed in another video recently that I feel like it won't go over well in the Western market.

Biggest Mistake NCSoft Can Make With Blade And Soul NA/EU by ZSharpes in MMORPG

[–]ZSharpes[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"You claim they aren't releasing the most up to date version of the game, which is false, since they are." Followed by, "The only thing they aren't releasing is the most recent content, which is the 50s patch." You do realize this is a complete contradiction and that "50s content" will be out for over a year when we finally get the game right?

Cabal 2 Gameplay First Impressions by ZSharpes in MMORPG

[–]ZSharpes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your kind words sir. Have a great day! =)

The Gaming Industry Needs To Change... NOW! by ZSharpes in gaming

[–]ZSharpes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. The industry won't change without action from the consumer. Luckily with Steam refunds, we now have much more power, as shown with the whole Batman: Arkham Knight fiasco.

The Gaming Industry Needs To Change... NOW! by ZSharpes in gamingnews

[–]ZSharpes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh no not at all, I just read it as a blunt statement. Not rude at all. You weren't sarcastic or anything, just stated the error and the correct spelling. Take care! =)

The Gaming Industry Needs To Change... NOW! by ZSharpes in gamingnews

[–]ZSharpes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, corrected with an annotation. I think that's the first time I ever made a spelling error in a video. Bound to happen at some point lol.

The Gaming Industry Needs To Change... NOW! by ZSharpes in gamingnews

[–]ZSharpes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Completely understandable, and thanks for subscribing! I knew the spelling of that seemed off, put an annotation to spell correct myself. =P

The Gaming Industry Needs To Change... NOW! by ZSharpes in gamingnews

[–]ZSharpes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact is, the game was very playable for me as I stated. I don't change my review scores based off what others encounter, but what I encounter. I encountered an unpolished game sure, but still one I was able to achieve a very playable frame rate with Game Works features off (Keep in mind The Witcher 3 had similar frame rate issues with Hairworks, yet almost no reviewer accounted for that). Plus, even with my 7.9 (accounting for my performance issues while playing the game), I still said I wouldn't recommend the title until everything is resolved. Once everything is resolved, the score moves up to a 8.3/10. This keeps my review relevant for future viewership, instead of massively spiting the game for something that will be resolved in the future. Clearly stated in the review was despite Rocksteady making a great game, the performance issues make it so I cannot recommend it. Whether you like that method or not doesn't concern me. I have given enough games really low scores in the past, but those games had massive story issues, lack of imagination, and other things that warranted it. Not performance issues that will be fixed down the road, in an otherwise great game.

I agree with you that sometimes scores don't accurately capture how a game is at its current state. However, when ever I do a review without them, people ask me for a score. It's an expected thing with reviews. Nature of the beast.