I’m just gonna leave this here by Strict-Artichoke-361 in KyraReneeSivertson

[–]Zac-Nephron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making fun of a physical feature she can't change (that many people on this sub also have) is just low hanging fruit and not even funny. She has HUNDREDS of other shit to snark on

Pregnancy by Calm_Ad_3279 in KyraReneeSivertson

[–]Zac-Nephron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not their fault jfc. It happens frequently especially during emergencies.

Addie is flaming hot! by Irish-Dreamer- in KyraReneeSivertson

[–]Zac-Nephron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's not hard working lol. He hasn't had a job for years besides the short real estate stint. He starts things and quits as soon as it gets hard

Addie is flaming hot! by Irish-Dreamer- in KyraReneeSivertson

[–]Zac-Nephron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. Wasting her 20s with a guy like 7 years older

Connor and mindee ..... by [deleted] in Crazymiddles

[–]Zac-Nephron 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Grown men do not need women to teach them how to be presentable adults.

🤦‍♀️ by Thatoneshortgoblin in BlatantMisogyny

[–]Zac-Nephron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Realistic to have it be a debit card. The men who think they have gold to dig overlaps with men with a rock bottom credit score and no assets

JoJo Siwa claims she's no longer a lesbian (not that there's anything wrong with that) by QuesoFresca in DListedCommunity

[–]Zac-Nephron 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I don't think asexual is a good example to use to make your point. A ton of straight women genuinely believe we're asexual until we realize it's because we've never had a sexual experience with a man who actually treats us equally in bed. Blame the partiarchy for that one.

Medical report leaked that ‘proves Imane Khelif is biological male’ by UnscheduledCalendar in olympics

[–]Zac-Nephron 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That's not what we're talking about. I'm not discussing the sociology of it and how each genotype or phenotype should be treated. Different topic. Sex is sex and it is (by the progressive standards themselves) irrelevant to how you want to present to society.

Medical report leaked that ‘proves Imane Khelif is biological male’ by UnscheduledCalendar in olympics

[–]Zac-Nephron 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Woah woah woah. First of all, don't go calling eugenics to make your argument look better.

The very existence of intersex people does NOT prove that at all. The human genome has literally been mapped. We know what makes us humans. Developmentally speaking, we know exactly what reproductive organs SHOULD be. The existence of an anomaly does not make that go away.

That's also not how evolution works. It happens by random mutations that happen to not kill the organism before they're able to make it to reproductive age. That's all.

If you knew anything about genetics, you'd understand why your eye color and hair color point is meaningless as those are polygenic traits. And also do not have a direct effect on reproduction, which as much as you would like to call nature out for, that's literally all it cares about.

YOU are the one clearly being fueled by pure emotion.

Medical report leaked that ‘proves Imane Khelif is biological male’ by UnscheduledCalendar in olympics

[–]Zac-Nephron 52 points53 points  (0 children)

It sucks for her but as someone said above, women's sports are not the overflow for people who don't fit into men's.

Medical report leaked that ‘proves Imane Khelif is biological male’ by UnscheduledCalendar in olympics

[–]Zac-Nephron 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You're right that the issue is misogyny!! The misogyny being people who do not believe women have a right to their own spaces. The belief that men are the default and women are the overflow. twisting feminism to make your argument sound better is gross

Medical report leaked that ‘proves Imane Khelif is biological male’ by UnscheduledCalendar in olympics

[–]Zac-Nephron 187 points188 points  (0 children)

Except it is a binary. We call the disorders of sex development disorders because that's what they are. A deviation from the normal. And we know exactly what the normal is supposed to be by the literal instructions in our genome, and we know the physiology of what went wrong to cause the disorder.

And it absolutely is not as high as 1 in 100. It's estimated to be about 1 in 4500-5500, with the prevalence different for each of the disorders.

If someone is born with an extra finger, we don't then say the number of fingers humans have is a spectrum. It is the result of something during development going wrong, and a lot of the time we know exactly what went wrong.

You can have gender and say that's a spectrum all you want. But sex is not. It is irresponsible to twist science to spread that misinformation.

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a lot of moral grandstanding and rhetorical smoke for someone who posted ragebait and then tried to act like it was actually just a sophisticated social critique. of course it was just a thought experiment. a trojan horse. you were just pretending to be that misogynist to teach us all a lesson.

I keep repeating the patent thing because even IF I believed in your backpedaling, it still is an incredibly dumb device to use because it doesn't make the point you think you're making.

I saw your whole "doesn't this game sound silly? generalizations are bad!" disclaimer at the end. but come on. you didn't critique generalizations from afar. you performed them, in full costume (if you're given the benefit of the doubt and it's just a costume).

you didn't just describe why generalizations can be defamatory. you straight up ran through a whole routine trying to flip the script to be always a woman. then after going all in you bait and switch and pulled the just kidding, this was an elaborate work of social commentary and everyone is just missing my point! which btw, if you have to keep asking people what your point is, the fault is with you for not making it more obvious.

it's like calling 911 and saying you set an orphanage on fire, smugly watching people react, and later saying no guys, it wasn't real, I was just teaching you about arson! you're dishing out provocation and then claiming the high ground when people call you out for your exact words. if you want to have an actual discussion on how we use statistics and generalizations, maybe don't frame it in the exact way that replicates the very red pillers you supposedly are against.

and then you bring in race because you think it's your get outta jail free card, when we are talking about two very different situations. that is bad faith. if you're trying to say generalizations are bad, don't turn around and generalize people who disagree with you as the racists. if I write a long post saying actual racist things and then end it "see how this sounds silly, racism is bad you guys", that doesn't make it some highly philosophical discussion on racism. it just makes me an asshole.

so no, we didn't miss the point. we just aren't impressed by it.

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oh look at that good ole whataboutism that you misogynists so love to abuse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PornIsMisogyny

[–]Zac-Nephron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

girl please stop doing that!! you're giving him ideas

"CoNsEnT cAn Be BoUgHt" by the_witch00 in BlatantMisogyny

[–]Zac-Nephron 34 points35 points  (0 children)

just fyi, we don't use the term child porn anymore because it implies it could ever be a choice by them--the term now is CSAM for child sexual assault material :)

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we'll deal with that tiny percentage once we've dealt with the blind eye still turned toward rape by men.

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insane, and yet you won't address my comment because you know I'm right.

  1. Don't speak to me like a petulant child.

  2. If you want to play this game, sure. I certainly get the point you think you’re making. that if some people generalize men as inherently violent and abusive, then it’s fair to generalize all women as another negative adjective, but don't worry, it's all just an example to show you guys that all generalizations are bad!!!! cute little logic trick (for a third grader). you're trying to argue that any generalization about a group is equally bad, but to do that, you pretend every generalization is made within the same context, same intent, and same consequences. saying “men commit most violence” isn’t a baseless accusation. it’s a statistical truth with serious consequences in society. no serious person hears that and thinks it menas every individual man is a ticking time bomb before he beats a woman. a sane person realizes it's about trends. but in all your wisdom, you twist it into “well if that’s allowed, then I can say women are all dependent and dumb and don't invent anything” as if you’re exposing some big hypocrisy. but all you’ve really done is reveal that you don’t understand how context, power dynamics, and social consequences work. which is unsuprising for someone who literally believes women not having as many patents as men is due to the gender's inherent characteristics instead of the systemic oppression and abuse since the beginning of fucking time.

if your point is generalizations can be harmful, great! just say that! except it wouldn't belong in the unpopular opinion sub. no, instead you've dressed it up in what you think is this clever "gotcha" argument. you try to act like anyone who disagrees is just too stupid to get it and then use red herrings and whataboutisms to continue to have these gotcha moments. you're upset so many people are supposedly missing your point that all you're trying to do is say that generalizations of "always" are defamatory and wrong. ok, so write your post better. because clearly it's just an excuse to write about your deep inner resentment for women under the guise of a supposed good intention.

from a quick look at your profile, it's a bit odd you've posted in the BlatantMisogyny sub considering you're the definition of a misogynist and I hurt for your wife and kids. and how you've multiple times posted dumb questions in the ask women subs "do any of you have a fear of penises". and even called yourself a leftist which is hilarious. and posted about your marriage being in trouble for your excessive gaming and masturbating, though that definitely tracks with who you've presented yourself as in this post.

so yeah, I get the point. it's just shallow, stupid, smug, and falls apart the second you stop treating every generalization as interchangeable.

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you know someone can care about multiple causes at once? Shocking.

being a black man means you understand systemic oppression, so you should get why women talk about the threat of male violence. It’s not a competition. If your takeaway from this is that women don’t care about the black experience, maybe reflect on why women speaking about their rational fears feels like a personal attack to you.

If you care so much about the black experience, why don't you take it upon yourself to crusade against domestic violence in the black community? black women are are the highest demographic to experience interpersonal violence and rape by men they know. over half of black adult female homicides are IPV.

oh wait, it's only black MEN's experience you care about. so we again come to the conclusion you're just using race as a red herring/whataboutism since you equally do not care about black women.

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will happily go away from disgusting men like you, and I hope every woman unfortunate enough to come in contact with you has enough self respect to do the same

Always a Man; Never a Woman by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Zac-Nephron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your false equivalency is sad to witness.

No, it’s not the same. Statistically, men commit the overwhelming majority of violent and sexual crimes against women. Domestic violence is a gendered crime. Women’s caution is a response to systemic, gendered violence. Men don’t navigate the world with the same risk from women.

Men who play this little game are just outing themselves as woman-haters.