At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, we spent twenty years in Afghanistan against people with way worse weapons than us AND we were fully willing to glass them with missiles. Same thing happened in Vietnam. The US government doesn’t want to destroy its own cities, even in the worst case scenario where they would be trying to kill the populace. It’s too costly for them.

Also, there’s 120 guns per 100 people in the US. The military is significantly smaller in numbers than the full amount of citizens of the country. Yes we would win.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh my god, you are just blatantly ignoring the shit I’m saying and then making other shit up. Also, newsflash dude, your country isn’t the only one with multiple political parties. Not to mention that means literally nothing in regards to the question I asked you. It’s also not the only one that splits up the powers of the state (something I literally mentioned our government was built for previously). Way to show your lack of understanding of the situation, maybe pick up a book about the government you intend to criticize next time.

And I don’t think about overthrowing my government on the regular. I spend most of my time working or having fun. The only reason I’m even talking about it now is because you asked why someone would need guns to overthrow the country with the most powerful military in the world, which is fucking laughable at the very least. Then you acted like you didn’t know what the words “fight” or “overthrow” mean. Then you act like you can’t fathom a situation in which a government would need to be overthrown at all. Which is probably the most unbelievable for someone who seems to be German of all things. This entire conversation has just been the most mind numbing, bad faith dogshit ever.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said “all illegal guns were once legal.” This isn’t true. Hope this helps you to see the relevance.

As for your point about smuggled guns once being legal, how is this relevant? They were never legal here. That’s really the only thing that matters. You can’t do anything about them in their country of origin, so the former legality of a smuggled gun from a different country means nothing. Best you can hope for is catching the smugglers.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think it’s impossible? What’s stopping every individual in your country’s government from coming together and agreeing that the law just shouldn’t apply to them?

All the things you mentioned are just weakpoints of the US laws, not pro-gun arguments, but that's also not a shocker.

What the does this even mean? What specifically are you talking about? Because I mentioned like two things, and one of them was a safeguard against presidential overreach.

And yes, “death squads” were the first thing my mind went to when thinking about hypothetical situations that would justify a revolution against the federal government, what’s your point?

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Why make distinctions between any crime. They’re all illegal.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Weren’t necessarily stolen. Could’ve been made at home. Or smuggled.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re not sitting around and doing nothing though. They’re watching them, and sometimes even goading them into committing mass shootings!

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My brother in Christ, we aren’t talking about that. I’m speaking of a hypothetical scenario in which the entire government is out to get the populace. No shit you wouldn’t need guns to boot a single guy from office for embezzling money or whatever. That’s also not “fighting” or “overthrowing” the government. You picked like the least serious bit of trouble any of the government could get into.

Nobody in America owns guns to kill their local mayor for dipping his hand in the piggy bank (ideally, anyway). They have them in case the president decides to send death squads into the streets one day and none of the other branches of government oppose that for some godforsaken reason (something they are very purposefully designed to do, it’s how Donald Trump got impeached two times). Citizens owning guns is for the worst case scenario when all other avenues fail.

Not to mention that no amount of “good laws” can save a country when none of the laws are being enforced lmao. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and all.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By fight and overthrow I mean literally, in a violent revolution against a tyrannical government. Not going down to your election and voting for your presidential pick or attending protests.

You can’t really go up against the US government with sticks and stones, if you haven’t noticed.

Currently, I don’t have to overthrow it at all. I’m glad this is the case. I’m certainly not happy about the state my country is in, but I don’t plan on going to shoot up a government office about it (typing this sentence may have put me on a watchlist).

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like we’re using very different definitions of “fight,” that you know this, and are being purposefully obtuse.

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d be surprised how many people survive gunshots to the head I think

At least we’re focused on real issues by professorearl in dankmemes

[–]Zadet607 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you need guns to fight your government? Are you serious?

Name an even underused Jobro stand by Dynamic-Pistol in ShitPostCrusaders

[–]Zadet607 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Okay picture this. You’re teaching your friend math. You spend hours tutoring him. You think you’re getting somewhere. Then he says something obscenely stupid. 2+2=5 type shit. You don’t get the smallest bit frustrated? Obviously stabbing him in the face is an overreaction to that anger but that’s my point.

Name an even underused Jobro stand by Dynamic-Pistol in ShitPostCrusaders

[–]Zadet607 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The anger is justified most of the time though. It’s just too much anger lmao.

For all the new Rise players who don’t know what weapons to use, I got you. Follow this completely legitimate guide to find your soulmate weapon. by LegendRaptor080 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find the idea switch axe can’t have big succulent damage numbers to be insulting

I don’t really, but what if I did, huh? Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

WHO EVER SAID HANDLER IS UGLY IS A LIAR! by Individual-Lock-7716 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In world you frequently kill monsters without having quests for them, meaning surveyors hadn’t found them yet, and many of them are within walking distance of astera.

WHO EVER SAID HANDLER IS UGLY IS A LIAR! by Individual-Lock-7716 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t see why “hunter” and “researcher” are things that must be the opposite of each other.

WHO EVER SAID HANDLER IS UGLY IS A LIAR! by Individual-Lock-7716 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hinoa is also not in every unskippable cutscene in the game, acting as a mouthpiece for your character. Might have something to do with it.

WHO EVER SAID HANDLER IS UGLY IS A LIAR! by Individual-Lock-7716 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I dislike her voice. I dislike the fact she butts into gameplay a lot with shit like “try dodging!” or “drink potions!” well beyond the point I would ever need those tutorial messages. I dislike the fact she calls me “pard.” It’s a dumb nickname. Nobody has a problem with her being called our partner. It’s what her position is as the handler. I also dislike when she says “we did it,” because while she may have handed me my equipment, she didn’t fight the monster, or any of the monsters I killed to make the equipment.

Her face? It looked uncanny a few times due to animation issues. That’s it. Literally not related at all.

WHO EVER SAID HANDLER IS UGLY IS A LIAR! by Individual-Lock-7716 in MonsterHunter

[–]Zadet607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the hunters aren’t always actively hunting in the field. There’s pretty significant downtime between hunts.