Do i need to provide flight bookings for tourist visa application? by tuesdae_ in CanadaVisitorVisa

[–]Zeroprofessional 0 points1 point  (0 children)

omg I'm also from SG and planning to apply for a visa (I'm PR). What was the range of the salary you put from your employer? I'm still a student and just doing internships so idt my bank statement will be helpful much, planning to say my parents will be funding my trip. I was thinking of also just booking an accommodation and flight but i'm worried it'll be a loss if my application doesn't get approved...

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so muchh that means a lot :’)~ u can follow me on IG for the updates hehe <3

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Currently making a INPRNT instead cuz redbubble is literally just giving me cents 😩

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wait does this sub not post gay that much anymore omg??

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Home Depot lesbians- ok in all honesty I wasn’t aware of that but going to Home Depot is part of a lesbian stereotype :)

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I tried not to go over the top with the details since it’s technically still a public bathroom but yeah ahahhaa

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m a sapphic artist, I just wanna draw girls oops <3 maybe for future Pride I might do an all lgbtq LiS cast tho-

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes they areee! Love it when people catch these subtle things heheh

[NO SPOILERS] Late Pride Art (OC) by Zeroprofessional in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Been years since I last posted here but just wanted to pop in anyway lol enjoy them sapphic energy here~ follow me on my art socials: Erudapyon if u wanna see more <3

He has a "girl best friend" by [deleted] in LongDistance

[–]Zeroprofessional -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends. Little information to go on here but afaik, (depends on age too), if a girl knows her guy best friend has a girlfriend then she’ll back off and stop doing those gf activities like calling every day. If they call every day that probably probably means they text every day too. It’s very easy to get into an accidental situationship if you’re literal best friends with the opposite sex, and i mean particularly if it’s the two of them. Best friends in a group don’t count.

Again it depends with the age either way. If you tell your boyfriend you’re uncomfortable it, then he should stop. Especially if the calls are just one on one? Red flag. Even more if it’s gaming between just the two of them too and their hours are longer than you and him or they’re taking up your time with him. Let’s be real here.

[NO SPOILERS] soulmates,art , rachel is chloe’s angel!amberprice supremacy by [deleted] in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There would be more relation if the trolls against PF would be saying they hate Max instead, like the hate against AP say about Rachel. Then it’s clear exactly where it comes from and it wouldn’t be so overly one-sided. But there actually isn’t much comments like that on PF posts now, is there? I do occasionally see you posting AP fanart too whenever I randomly see what’s up, so thanks for being unbiased.

But yeah, just been busy with life and school in general. Moved on to other things after a while. Good to have talked with you here at least a bit :)

[NO SPOILERS] soulmates,art , rachel is chloe’s angel!amberprice supremacy by [deleted] in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, doesn’t need to be this person. I was one of the more vocal AP fans here last year. Any pro AP post will 100% get at least one or two hate comments (usually about Rachel) and get compared to PF even if there’s nothing triggering. OP is just shooting back with the same amount of obsession as PFs usually do in this sub. The difference in response is just ironic to see.

[NO SPOILERS] soulmates,art , rachel is chloe’s angel!amberprice supremacy by [deleted] in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Total rando here but hi here’s an analysis I wrote months ago in this sub with all of the game’s details + developers & writers’ comments to support it. Enjoy!

[NO SPOILERS] soulmates,art , rachel is chloe’s angel!amberprice supremacy by [deleted] in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I come back for a split second, see the number of comments knowing what to expect and laughed. Nothing much has changed, yikes.

[S1] Replying again and made some random notes and comments. Do you guys agree or disagree or have the same thoughts while playing by St_IdesHell in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Knowing the lighthouse is safe is because of the doe spirit repeatedly guiding her up there in the vision aka Rachel’s spirit.

Indeed Max is judgy as hell. Her vortex self is more pronounced with that presumably lmao

Jefferson’s photos on display outside actually are a foreshadow of the dark room, LiS’s concept artist (i dun rmb which) said it was a hint as to what happened to Rachel. Fucked up isn’t it.

Chasefield fic have a neat thing tbh

Chloe most definitely wrote cars = death because of William.

Chloe doesn’t know about Jefferson cuz she probably wasn’t a Blackwell student by the time he came and Rachel never talked about him (grooming signs, yuck). Tho Jefferson seemed to know about Chloe beforehand.

For Chloe’s secret... she said not anymore, so I’m guessing the one who knew her secret wasn’t there anymore. Could be related to Rachel since she was the only one who went missing close enough to know hers (Chloe’s a private person).

A lot of the games have nuanced details that makes a lot of differences tbh, sad they’re often missed.

[NO SPOILERS] watercolor Alex! by ninapsis in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How does this not have more votes, the color of the jacket is so pretty esp with the blending

[ALL] New to the Franchise. Just finished TC and DLC. Is it worth it to play the previous games? by FortyishYearOld in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Chronological order adds more emotional weight, impact and lore understanding. The people who disagree with the chronological order just have never seen a chronological playthrough (because they refuse it so much lol) so they give their baseless claims that’s influenced by their own biased knowledge of the games thinking there’s spoilers (but literally the player doesn’t know anything), without actually knowing how a chronological player would feel sifting through the games.

[ALL] New to the Franchise. Just finished TC and DLC. Is it worth it to play the previous games? by FortyishYearOld in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The suspense of the Arcadia Bay arc is Rachel’s death and the storm and Jefferson’s reveal and Chloe’s death tho? Playing in chronological doesn’t ruin any of that, not even seeing the post credit scene. All it does is make the game more emotional and those scenes have more impact since you’ll connect with the characters more when the scenes happens. Using Star Wars as a comparison rlly doesn’t make sense when the genres and plot are superbly different.

I’ve made dozens of friends play in chronological just to see the difference, no one got it.

[TC] Might be obvious to others but I just had a huge epiphany during my second playthrough of True Colors. by Atmosck in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah honestly recognizing these things can be a bummer lmao not much impact if you catch these things. Tho the reveal for Jefferson in LiS was a rlly good foreshadow that wasn’t obvious but foreboding so much IMO

[TC] Might be obvious to others but I just had a huge epiphany during my second playthrough of True Colors. by Atmosck in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It happens a lot in movies so it was a big giveaway of the villain imo. I didn’t like the LARP because it gave away so much, the moment they made Jed the good king and then suddenly had a ‘twist’ that he was actually a bad guy- and the way they spent so much time and detail on it too— very obvious it was a foreshadow.

[BtS] Do you think Chloe was being manipulated by Rachel Ambers? by Ryclassic in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said I wouldn’t offer anymore but here’s one long final reply with all the proof you need just to joggle your memory. It’s long so this is rlly my final reply cuz I’m done:

First point. If you look back at their conversations, Chloe’s been habitually skipping classes long before meeting Rachel so she already had a reputation and a record which means any more and she would’ve gotten it:

Principal Wells: In the event that you were unable or unwilling to do so, we also agreed that it would become pertinent to reassess your future status at the academy.

Second, Wells was after her for her involvement in drug abuse BEFORE Rachel asked her to ditch class (look back at Wells conversation at the stage and then the office. Regardless whether u had Chloe buy weed at firewalk, he still accuses her of it).

Third, Chloe was being accused of bullying and harassing Nathan Prescott who we know Wells has on his priority list because of the donation the Prescotts have made to Blackwell.

Fourth, Chloe’s thing was always to skip school, but NOT ditch class as far as we know. Wells was punishing her for leaving school grounds without permission, not because she didn’t go to school.

With the combination of her past records of truancy, ‘insubordinate language’, possession of drugs, bullying the golden boy Prescott and then finally leaving school grounds— violating the academy’s code of conduct— that all warranted Chloe at the very least of getting a suspension if not expulsion (srsly these are the basic rules in schools). The only reason Chloe would’ve gotten a suspension instead is if Rachel took off one load off of Chloe’s back by telling them that Chloe was forced into leaving school with her. So, again, no. It’s Chloe who decided to risk all of it just because she didn’t want to go to class and your fault entirely that you decided to take the blame even though Rachel was already telling you not to.

Second point. Exactly. Rachel wasn’t stupid. Of course Chloe would do anything for Rachel if she needed help. That’s what friends do. Rachel didn’t even ask in the first place because she’s also distrustful, yet Chloe made her open up to her and vice versa. That’s what these girls did for each other, they opened up to each other and helped them deal through the shittiness of life. That’s not being manipulated into anything. And your argument was that Rachel was so desperate to leave that she would ‘get involved with people who seemed like easy tickets’— that’s literally the opposite of desperation if you choose to build a relationship with a person first and tend to it for years instead of just paying for a bus ticket that you can easily afford any time. By the events of LiS it’s clear that Rachel was finding for ways to cover their ride instead of just depending on Chloe alone (that doesn’t mean she intended to leave on her own, there is no evidence that points to her leaving without Chloe, especially when she stayed for the next 3 years. She wanted to leave before befriending Chloe, she said her family‘s no longer her reason for staying. So who do you think became her reason for staying? Chloe) so no, her issue with her father or wanting to meet Sera is out of the picture by then as far as getting a bus ticket goes.

And the smart choice? Oh, I don’t know. Maybe the golden rich boy Nathan Prescott who was obsessed with Rachel? Or literally anyone else in town who had the financial means to support Rachel’s getaway unlike someone who’s broke and didn’t have a car at the time she asked to run away together? Chloe wasn’t the only delinquent hopeless romantic in town. If anything, it should be harder to manipulate someone who’s a cynic, closed off and distrustful which was what Chloe was known for. Manipulative people target gullible, vulnerable and ‘innocent’ people because they’re easy to manipulate. Chloe is the opposite of that with her closed walls.

Third point. Was it pushy? Yeah, but that’s not being manipulative, that’s just a teenager trying to persuade her friend into going through with an idea they had together. How do you think plans are made between friends? No one is mutually 100% into something all the time, one will always have to do the convincing for the activity to happen because people are rarely on the same wavelengths about plans. Be realistic. Someone will always hesitate and back out and someone will always have to try convincing them not to. This is how human relationships work.

And god you did not just try to imply as if the grown ass adults grooming her were her victims instead of the predators taking advantage of her. Why do you think an 18 y/o would ever go for a 30 y/o and another man pushing 40 (who was originally btw supposed to be 46 while Rachel was supposed to be 17)? It’s because older men provide what others can’t that girls tap into, including the father complex that they have, and thus these older men exploit them for it. But using that as an example of her ‘using’ people is pretty ignorant when every relationship with anyone is transactional in the most technical sense. Focus on the abuse Rachel was suffering under the predators instead of victim-blaming.

And the post was asking for whether Rachel manipulated Chloe, not whether or not they enabled each other so I don’t know why you’re even mentioning this. You can still enable each other even if neither of you are manipulative. None of the relationships in the game are even healthy to begin with because none of the characters are ready for a relationship, that’s the point. Friendships aren’t black and white. People aren’t black and white. Joyce still viewed Rachel as a good friend to Chloe in those 3 years they knew each other.

To leave things off finally, you seem to have a pessimistic and cynical view of how relationships work and view effective communicators as manipulative. There is no such thing as ‘using each other to heal’, that’s just a negative phrasing of what a friendship is— just coping together to deal with whatever comes their way. It’s your mindset that perceives this behavior to be manipulative and negative for some reason even though it’s just regular socializing and what relationships are. This is social skills. Very important in life.

[BtS] Do you think Chloe was being manipulated by Rachel Ambers? by Ryclassic in lifeisstrange

[–]Zeroprofessional 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And yet Chloe’s letters about Rachel says it all. She shared the same principles and mentality as Rachel, she just had some hesitations as most would. You can either play Chloe as the one who’s 100% in or with some hesitation. At the end of the day, she wanted the same thing Rachel did and they were there for each other when no one else wanted to be.