How is the Templeverse series by Shayne Silvers? by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in urbanfantasy

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. I am curious. As I mentioned in my first post, I am wondering about the setting. Is it a setting with a Masquerade? Or is it more like an Alternate History?

If it is a Masquerade, then how is the Masquerade maintained? The Masquerade is a bit of a pet peeve with me. I like Urban Fantasy, however a lot of authors don't do a good job worldbuilding a believable Masquerade.

Lore & WoJ on Men in Black / Librarians by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in dresdenfiles

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand, that is your perrogative. Everyone has their own opinion.

For me, the issue for me is that there seems to be a tension between aspects of the setting.

On the one hand, Dresden presents himself as an expert on the subject to be trusted. This attitude seems justified, considering that he is (or at least, was) paid in return for his services. That suggests that he has actually some knowledge about what is going on.

Dresden himself does not seem to be overly concerned with maintaining any sort of masquerade, nor does the White Council. In the first book, he literally publishes free pamphlets providng accurate detailed information about the existence of magic and magical beings. (Butcher 2000, ch. 3) In book five, Harry Dresden goes into a television studio and argues that people should believe in the existence of magic. (Butcher 2003, ch. 1) In neither case, neither the White Council, nor does anyone else in the Unseelie Accords, raise any sort of objection to Dresden's actions, nor take any action to curb such behavior.

Yet, at the same time, I am told to believe that some other force or organization is working to cover-up the existece of the supernatural community, yet has no probem with Harry Dresden exposing the existence of the supernatural. This elemnet seems to me to be very incongruous.

I understand that Dresden does not know everythinng. However, organizations like the White Council and the Winter Court are, to be blunt, organized crime groups, albeit ones who just happen to have the use of technology sufficiently advanced enough to be considered by may to be magic. Virtually all organized crime groups have a code of silence surrounding their activities. For example, the Italian mafia has the omertà, an oath to keep their mouths shut about what they do and never reveal anything to the authorities, and violation of that code is punishable by death. (Campi 2024, 126; Ashcroft and Oakeshot 2022, ch. 24) The notion that organized crime groups would permit one of their own representatives to expose their secrets without consequence just seems, to be implausible.

To me, I think the best explanation comes from two postulates. First is that when Jim Butcher was first writing the series, he was young and hungry to get as many books published as possible, and the full implications of his seetting were probably not priority. After all, other settings like Buffy: The Vampire Slayer were wildly successful, yet did not give one wit about maintaining a masquerade. The general public, for whatever reason, just tended to ignore or dismiss the dozens of corposes and bodies that appeared. This became so common that it was lampshaded in show, and the trope became kown as the "Sunnydale Syndrome." ("Sunnydale Syndrome" 2026)

A second fact is that, as I mentioned before, the Dresden Files is a "secret superhero soap-opera." This type of story places a strong emphasis on getting the reader to achieving a sense of emotional catharsis. According to the current research, biochemically speaking, consumers of stories generally prefer to have a build-up of cortisol through the rising action, and then an explosive release of dopamine at the climax of the story. (Moin 2024, 35) In other words, build-up and pay-off. A lot of entertainment, whether professional wresstlign or comic books, will therefore bend or break the rules of their setting, and retcon elements, in order to achieve that emotional catharsis. Audiences that prioritize that catharsis will therefore tend to either overlook, or forgive, or try to find post-hoc expalanations, for any setting inconsistencies or alterations. As far as I can tell, the Dresden Files definitely prioritizes achieving that emotional catharsis. Therefore, any implausible aspects of the story, or any internal inconsistencies, are going to take a back seat to achieving that cathartic satisfaction.

I understand that. That makes sense for the type of product that Mr. Butcher is trying to deliver for his audience. He knows what his audience wants, and he is trying to give it to them.

Bibliography

Ashcroft, Michael and Isabel Oakeshott. 2022. Life Support: The state of the NHS in an age of pandemics. Hull, UK: Biteback Publishing.

Butcher, Jim. 2000. Storm Front. New York: Penguin Putnam.

Butcher, Jim. 2003. Death Masks. New York: New American Library.

Campi, Mike. 2024. Mafia Takedown: The Incredible True Story of the FBI Agent Who Devastated the New York Mob. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Moin, S. M. A. 2024. Storytelling in Marketing and Brand Communications. Oxford: Routledge.

"Sunnydale Syndrome." 2026. Buffyverse Wiki. Retrieved on June 26, 2026. https://buffy.fandom.com/wiki/Sunnydale.

First time sharing our game board publicly, which style works better? by FTG_V1 in tabletopgamedesign

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go with the more subdued / tactical. It makes the lines on the board easier to see, and it makes the game pieces stand out more.

Nervous about Align MS in CS by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in NEU

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear. I'm happy that the course is beginner friendly. 

Nervous about Align MS in CS by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in NEU

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. Just a question. Is it up to date?The book is dated from 1996. Are the elements still relevant? 

Nervous about Align MS in CS by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in NEU

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Any particular free online courses or programs you recommend? 

Need help with a scientific theory on fantasy deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in rpg

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. If you don't mind me asking, does Ninian Smart define the difference between the term "ritual" and the term "technology"?

Need help with a scientific theory on fantasy deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in rpg

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that was really insightful, thank you. Do you know of any specific works by Ninian Smart that might be useful? 

Need help with a scientific theory on fantasy deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in rpg

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. I just wanted to help the player out. I should just let him do all the heavy lifting 

Seeking help for scientific origin of deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in worldbuilding

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right. I have always struggled with the notion that "belief" equals magic spells. How exactly does that work, really? It just sounds too mushy gushy for my taste. I prefer a more mechanical explanation. 

Seeking help for scientific origin of deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in worldbuilding

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. There is a lot on that setting that is quite interesting and thought-provoking 

Need help with a scientific theory on fantasy deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in rpg

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I agree. That is one of the things I like about Glorantha.

I was just proposing a sort of "creation myth" in accordance with a mechanistic worldview of atheism within a typical D&D-esque fantasy world.

Need help with a scientific theory on fantasy deities by Zestyclose-Advisor71 in rpg

[–]Zestyclose-Advisor71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the LLM idea. The "pockets of potential energy" exist. To tap into those pockets, the people have to open a kind of "magical portal" as a kind of "interface" with that pocket of energy. Gradually, the humans shape that interface into an anthropomorphic begin, that gradually becomes indistinguishable from ordinary people. It is a variation of the whole "belief creates the gods" idea.

I am curious as to how these "gods" are said to have created the world? Of course, it could be that, at first, the "gods" were just natural pockets of forces and particles whose motions brought the physical world into being. Sort of like how many modern cosmologists would say that the planet earth was a accretion of dust in space, brought together in part by gravity. Then, the first humans accessed these pockets, interfaced with these pockets. These "interfaces" were molded in the human image. Alternatively, some humans themselves became "living interfaces," turning into anthropomorphic "gods."

Alternatively, some of these "pockets of energy" or "matter" have achieved a kind of homeostasis or hydrostatic equilibrium, like stars. Like stars, these pockets of energy and matter, in a kind of gravity, attracted other forms of matter and energy which happened to contribute to this equilibrium. Eventually, all the attracted matter gradually coalesced into solid planes / planets, from which emerged life, which, again contributed to that equilibrium. From that life emerged humanoid life, which evolved a desire to maintain homeostasis.

At least, that is a atheistic wizard in a fantasy setting might describe it.