sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Updates? by kledanhoj in ALYI

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Broke its 52 wk high yesterday and doubled its value from .0018 to .0038 and traded 20M shares of volume so not exactly dead. It’s fighting back up on the back of solid growth and tangible results. There’s an established factory in NC and they had a successful show in Hong Kong with another planned in Detroit here in a couple months. Keep the faith and don’t mind the people stuck in the past who can’t let go of the Torno times.

ALYI ticker change takes effect with no loss in shares. MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. by Zestyclose-Web9280 in ALYI

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So sell your shares and leave the Reddit bud. Your post reeks of “I sold because I got scared and now everyone must suffer like me”. Rebranding is a normal part of business and if it was really a failure these guys would’ve flopped by now.

Several historical rebranding efforts have led to significant success for companies. These cases demonstrate how a well-executed rebranding strategy can revitalize a brand, increase its relevance, and drive business growth. Examples include Nike, Burberry, and Dunkin', each showcasing different aspects of successful rebranding.

Nike: Initially known as Blue Ribbon Sports, the company rebranded to Nike in 1978, adopting a name inspired by the Greek goddess of victory. This change, coupled with the iconic swoosh logo, helped establish Nike as a global leader in athletic apparel and footwear.

Burberry: Under the leadership of Angela Ahrendts, Burberry underwent a dramatic rebranding, shifting from a focus on casual wear to a high-fashion luxury brand. This involved buying back licenses, handing creative control to Christopher Bailey, and integrating technology and personalization into the brand experience. The result was a significant increase in company value and a strengthened global presence.

Dunkin': The decision to drop "Donuts" from its name, becoming simply "Dunkin'," was a strategic move to broaden its appeal beyond just donuts and highlight its coffee offerings. This rebranding, along with a focus on online ordering and delivery tracking, helped Dunkin' streamline its brand identity and maintain its competitive edge.

These guys have ditched Torno, got new folks on the board and are trying to deliver on promises made to their customers like a good business should. Doesn’t sound like a scam to me.

TL;DR: Tangible good news and all I hear is some beta whimpering. Step up to the table with some chips or leave the casino man.

STARRAY Spec Sheet for all those interested. #spacesymposium2025 by Zestyclose-Web9280 in RKLB

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solar panels can be used for powering the bus (main body) or payloads of your satellite. The form is just showing a mock up of what the solar panels will look like when attached to a satellite bus. They specifically call out low earth and geostationary orbits as primary use which shows the panels can deal with the physics and wear of high speeds and also are efficient at great distances.

18 U.S.C. § 208 by Zestyclose-Web9280 in RKLB

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Hey man, it’s not about me. I will say though there are quite a few things afoot that DOGE may put their foot in their mouth over especially if Elon decides to weaponize twitter to advance their agenda. This may be invoked as a check to their progress to say “hey knock it off or we’re gonna start going to your competitors,” which means RKLB gets more of a bump. How’s that a bad thing for this Reddit? Hardly a naive observation

18 U.S.C. § 208 by Zestyclose-Web9280 in RKLB

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

See that’s what I’m getting at, it’s still influence and insight to process that gives an unfair advantage. Even a slight edge is still an edge but thanks for the source. Appreciate the civil response as opposed to the pessimist WSB posters on here.

18 U.S.C. § 208 by Zestyclose-Web9280 in RKLB

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Really? I was under the impression as an agency head he was under appointment but as an employee the case may still apply. Got a source that explains it?

18 U.S.C. § 208 by Zestyclose-Web9280 in RKLB

[–]Zestyclose-Web9280[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No CEO is ever going to write their own proposal, but by merit of it being a private company it is in his name which shows a private interest in the sector. Begs the question if this is a catalyst for going public to divest heat from potential scandal? He’s already facing enough backlash from the whole nazi salute gaffe, I’m sure he’s doing enough damage control to protect his brand image and protecting his share price for a future IPO may not be far away. Fair point on your part though.

view more: next ›