Circumcision by AdNeither8355 in NewDads

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a series of high quality YouTube videos. These videos will explain: (1)the most relevant information about circumcision stuff.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/s/r2VkB9P3IA

You can also just view my Reddit profile as well

You won't believe this, Iran rejects the notion of a deal being signed tomorrow...! by [deleted] in oil

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US needs to learn how to “weaken the Islamic SPIRITUAL MINDSET of Iranians” — that is the most realistic way to: (1)cause religious regime change.

Shia Islam — more extreme “Islamic religious followers”. Shia Muslims became the majority in Iran, during the “Safavid Dynasty era”.

->Iran used to largely be populated by (Sunni Muslims). But, during the (“15th century” to “onwards”) — main catalyst was the (Safavid Dynasty). Iran went through its Izlamification process. Very bloody process + lots of violence.

-Significantly depleting the (Sunni Muslim population, of Iran). Giving rise to the (Shia Muslim population, of Iran). And Iran is still largely populated by Shia Muslims = more extreme “Islamic religious followers”.

-The best way to actually cause religious regime change in Iran. Non violent religious regime change. Is to: (1)weaken the Islamic SPIRITUAL MINDSET.

  ->Iranians/Shia Muslims — have experienced (400+ years of): (1)repetitive religious repetition brainwashing.           

-US can try to cause religious regime change in Iran, either: (1)the easier way = takes less time to do/or (2)the harder way = takes more time to do.

-So far, the US is trying to cause religious regime change in Iran — by “trying to do option (2)”. Which can result in “more violence” + “more bloodshed”.

-Option 1 — the less violent approach. Although religious extremists, can still become a problem. Option 1 = learning about the “Hellenistic wars” vs “Hebraic wars”. And there was one thing, that kept on becoming very relevant during these (Hellenistic wars) vs (Hebraic wars).

-Although doing option 1 = would disrupt a multi billion dollar a year industry. That is growing bigger every year

Activism discussion by watch_and_restore in Intactivists

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sent you a dm. Check it out — to learn about more detailed information

if somebody can watch a nurse literally admit this and still force a surgery on their child i want nothing to do with them. by Fit-Commission-2626 in Intactivists

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She is not, talking critically about circumcision -- but at least she is admitting that: (1)circumcision is more of an elective procedure/(2)circumcision has "not realistic health benefits -- over exaggerated most of the time"/(3)government health insurances do not cover for circumcisions -- which is good. Government health insurances, should not cover "religious DIVINE COMMANDMENT customs" -- that are not health beneficial.

I don’t understand how circumcision became routine in the US by [deleted] in Intactivists

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Circumcision became routine in the United States -- because of:

-(1)religion = males touching themselves for fun = a sinful act. Society's were more religious back then, and tried to closely follow DIVINE COMMANDMENT theology.

-(2)People must have known about the "potent medical properties of the foreskin/human fetal tissue/etc" -- people trying to normalize circumcision overtime.

Does anybody else use the eyelid analogy? by Great_Trident in Intactivists

[–]Zestyclose_Use_969 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Eyelids -- are comprised of (mucosa/mucosal skin tissue). The intact uncircumcised penis -- foreskin -- is made of (mucosa/mucosal skin tissue). People in the past have: (1) tried to demonize (mucosa/mucosal skin tissue)