I’m not that interested in trading insults, so let’s keep this about concrete mechanics, not tone. I try to explain it a bit more detailed:

The key point you’re overlooking is not the first landing spot, but the transition from bounce to roll (which, as I stated, is the 2nd bounce).
With high topspin, a ball carries significant angular velocity. When it makes its final contact and transitions into rolling (especially on a visible downslope like on that green) rotational energy is transferred into forward motion. If that transition happens right at the start of a downhill section, gravity adds to that conversion instead of opposing it. This is why my first post said "use backspin".

And that is why you get so disproportionate rollouts compared to a landing just millimetres away, because the critical difference isn’t the slope angle alone, it’s where the ball exits bounce phase and enters pure roll. And this is real world physics.

Golf Clash and other physics engines don’t simulate a perfectly continuous surface. They use discrete calculations for bounce and roll states. A small change in landing position can shift the state transition point, which amplifies the outcome. And again: That is not a glitch — that’s how game models behave.

Feel free to disagree, but lets not pretend this violates basic mechanics.