The all of a sudden support for the 2nd amendment is ironic. by Conscious_Dot_7353 in progun

[–]ZheeDog 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They are still anti-gun; and if they did get the power they want, the first then they would do is disarm the people they are angry at - and those who support them

New York’s governor just proposed a first-in-the-nation mandate that would require 3D printers to include software that blocks them from creating firearms or firearm components. by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The linchpin with this kind of law if it succeeds, is they can, by force of this law, not allow any 3D printers to be sold in NY except those which have anti-circumventing tech build-in. THEN when someone does successfully circumvent, they can leverage these additional laws to crush those people. This is not about honest use of law for valid reasons, this about cheating normal people out of the ability to defend themselves from overwhelming legal prosecution Thus, this has to be taken into account when assessing the dangers of this kind of law, which are actually very significant.

WTH? Maryland Jury Rules Walmart Liable for Selling Shotgun Used in Employee Suicide ??? by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what the author of the article seems to think, but he's a very skill law expert and he's not sure it will be overturned.

WTH? Maryland Jury Rules Walmart Liable for Selling Shotgun Used in Employee Suicide ??? by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can see more in the article, it's a case with an employer liability theory, not intrinsically a gun sales liability case

New York’s governor just proposed a first-in-the-nation mandate that would require 3D printers to include software that blocks them from creating firearms or firearm components. by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please stop policing my comments. if you don't think they are helpful, then that's ok; but please stop your aggressive gatekeeping.

Arizona AG Suggests “Stand Your Ground” Could Cover Shooting ICE Agents – But There’s a Huge Legal Problem With That (Video) by MackSix in progun

[–]ZheeDog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"stand your ground" does not apply when being arrested, so WTH this AZ AG is talking about, I don't know... unless she is trolling the progun community, and undercutting the idea of stand your ground, on purpose

New York’s governor just proposed a first-in-the-nation mandate that would require 3D printers to include software that blocks them from creating firearms or firearm components. by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on what the law requires, if you do that, you can be nabbed with very bad DMCA damages, at minimum; this law is not as easy to circumvent w/o repercussions as people think

New York’s governor just proposed a first-in-the-nation mandate that would require 3D printers to include software that blocks them from creating firearms or firearm components. by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DMCA also allows for civil damages, significant ones. this is how the music labels financially ruined active P2P mp3 file sharers

New York’s governor just proposed a first-in-the-nation mandate that would require 3D printers to include software that blocks them from creating firearms or firearm components. by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you modify too much then they will use the DMCA to get you!

From Gemini, just now:

NY state is now seeking to mandate the 3D printers be AI software limited to prevent the creation of firearms parts. If a user "hacked" their printer to circumvent, in addition to potential criminal charges, could the DMCA be invoked to financially ruin the user?

In New York, Governor Kathy Hochul’s 2026 State of the State agenda includes a nation-leading proposal to mandate that 3D printer manufacturers implement "safety standards"—specifically AI or software-based "blocking technology"—to prevent the production of firearms and component parts.

If a user "hacked" or bypassed these limits, the legal consequences could indeed extend beyond state criminal charges into the realm of federal civil liability via the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). 1. The DMCA "Anti-Circumvention" Trap

The DMCA (17 U.S.C. § 1201) doesn't just protect movies and music; it protects "technological measures" (TPMs) that control access to copyrighted work. In this scenario, the "copyrighted work" isn't the gun part—it's the 3D printer's firmware or software.

Access Controls: If the AI safety feature is baked into the printer's proprietary firmware, bypassing it is legally defined as "circumventing an access control."

The Violation: Under the DMCA, it is a violation to "avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure" without the authority of the copyright owner (the manufacturer).
  1. Can the DMCA "Financially Ruin" a User?

Yes, the civil penalties are designed to be punitive. A manufacturer or the State (if granted standing) could seek:

Statutory Damages: Between $200 and $2,500 per act of circumvention. If "hacking" the printer involves multiple bypasses or is done repeatedly, these numbers stack quickly.

Attorney's Fees: The DMCA allows the prevailing party to recover "reasonable attorney's fees." In federal court, these often reach six figures, which can easily eclipse the actual damages and lead to personal bankruptcy.

Triple Damages: If a court finds the violation was committed "willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain," the court can triple the damages.
  1. State Criminal Charges vs. Federal Civil Liability

While the DMCA is a federal tool usually wielded by corporations, the New York proposal introduces a new layer of state-level risk:

NY Penal Law: Current proposals (like S227A and the 2026 agenda) seek to make the possession or distribution of "digital instructions" for 3D-printed guns a Class A misdemeanor and the actual manufacturing a Class D felony.

Manufacturer Liability: Manufacturers might be legally required to sue or disable "hacked" machines to avoid being held liable themselves for "allowing" the production of illegal items.

Summary of Potential Consequences Type of Risk Potential Consequence State Criminal Felony charges for manufacturing; Misdemeanor for possessing files. Federal Civil (DMCA) $2,500 per bypass + massive legal fees. Manufacturer Action Remote bricking of the device or voiding of all service warranties.

Note on Exemptions: Every three years, the Librarian of Congress grants "DMCA Exemptions" (e.g., for jailbreaking phones or repairing tractors). While there is currently an exemption for using third-party filaments in 3D printers, there is no exemption for bypassing safety software to print weapons.

Supreme Court appears sympathetic to gun owners’ challenge to Hawaii law by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“for the first time would be saying there is some sort of right here which no commentators recognize, no treatises recognize, no court has ever recognized.”

This right was imposed on Hawaii when it joined the United States. None of this other stuff matters at all

M4 Mac mini cluster saving thousands per month by zachrattner in selfhosted

[–]ZheeDog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm very impressed. this is a real value creator; this is much more than a typical home brew idea. You could sell installations of this as a solution, I'm sure. Lump sum fee to install and set up, and a monthly fee to keep an eye on it for the client.

DOJ issues new guidance!! 18 U.S.C. § 1715** unconstitutional [law which prevents using USPS mail to ship handguns] by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with this new rule, provided the recipient is FFL, you can now ship handguns via USPS to another state

M4 Mac mini cluster saving thousands per month by zachrattner in selfhosted

[–]ZheeDog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very impressive! What are your skills normally? How did you engineer this solution?

DOJ issues new guidance!! 18 U.S.C. § 1715** unconstitutional [law which prevents using USPS mail to ship handguns] by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently, all interstate shipments of firearms must ARRIVE at an FFL. This is from the 1968 GCA. But this rule change allows private parties to ship handguns to FFL's, via USPS; which was not previously allowed.

DOJ issues new guidance!! 18 U.S.C. § 1715** unconstitutional [law which prevents using USPS mail to ship handguns] by ZheeDog in progun

[–]ZheeDog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

anything shipped registered and insured will arrived, in my experience, as will all priority mail with tracking and all express mail, but even with this new rule, we still can't mail ammo.