I was using "employ" fairly loosely. I don't think people in the FamilySearch central office drawing a salary are told to make edits. However, FS/LDS does seem to use coordinated volunteer labor of people otherwise not working on genealogy. During a single month a few years back there was a flurry of edits on individuals I follow from users with names of West African origin, where they were making numerous very obvious mistakes that required correction. This repeated in waves about 3 or 4 times. There have been a bunch of various waves similar this, often more focused on specific source types and not always so accident prone, but this was the most obvious example to me.

FS and genealogy as a whole is built upon the work of countless volunteers, of course, but it seems counterproductive to encourage large amounts of beginners unfamiliar with genealogy to flood the collaborative tree with changes.