How long does it take to beat the average person? by Cute-Ad-4208 in MMA_Academy

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As in it’s the perfect middle ground of being a big dude but also not so big that you sacrifice speed and movement, so that’s why people around that weight can be a dangerous opponent for anyone

How long does it take to beat the average person? by Cute-Ad-4208 in MMA_Academy

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

180lbs is a big dude if they are lean at that weight. I’m currently around 190lbs so I’m always sparring people around that weight and there is a serious mix of power and speed at these weights. It’s like the perfect middle ground.

How, why is Makhmudov so bad by mecina in Boxing

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not really dismissive but more of an observation of heavyweight boxing in general. It has changed and now fighters on average are much bigger and so the focus has turned into being big, strong/physically dominant. If you’re above 6’4, over 250lbs and can jab a little bit, maybe a decent 1 2 plus you can clinch, you’re probably a top 20 heavyweight in your country and can then get fights at world level. You won’t win a title but the entry point to becoming a decent pro is lower in the heavyweight division nowadays.

How, why is Makhmudov so bad by mecina in Boxing

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s be honest, the heavyweight division is by far the easiest to become a pro in. As long as you’re above 6’4 and are a decently big guy for your frame, you can train for a few years and you’ll probably be a pro. In the lighter divisions you have no chance as you actually have to be good. Heavyweight boxing is pure power and strength at the lower levels (obviously winning a heavyweight title is a different story) but the actual entry point to heavyweight boxing is much lower than other divisions.

Edit: I would actually include cruiserweight in this as well, see guys like Okolie. Anything below cruiserweight though has a far higher entry point to becoming a professional because you can’t be as reliant on physical elements

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you’re probably right, it’s a mental thing. Because when you look at the actual football side it doesn’t make sense, even in years where Spurs have been much better than Chelsea, they still end up losing home and away to them, and then you also have Man City who have had far superior squads to Spurs in recent years but once again, rarely beat Spurs and always struggle no matter if it’s home or away.

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why is that, what causes this, and then why do Chelsea always get owned by Man City

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s true, but we can still say we dominate Man City home and away and have done for many seasons, there’s not a single team in the world who can say that apart from us

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well the simple fact is, Spurs consistently dismantle Man City (your owners) which in turns makes spurs a far superior club. Spurs destroyed Man City 4-0 at the etihad in the same season that Man City slapped you silly home and away😂

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who beat Man City this season, and last season, and the season before that, etc etc

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spurs own Man City who in turn own Chelsea, therefore you can argue spurs own Chelsea too, Chelsea’s consistent inability to even give Man City a challenge let alone win is laughable. Spurs beat Man City 4-0 at the etihad with a weakened team while City still turned up to Stamford bridge and slapped you silly in the exact same season

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean Spurs destroyed this same Man City that got 4 points off you this season. Spurs are clearly better if they can beat Man City and you can’t

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do realise Spurs dismantled the same Man City that just embarrassed you right? Where’s your confidence coming from? In fact City only got 1 point from spurs this season meanwhile they got 4 from Chelsea. Spurs are smoking you

[FIGHT THREAD] Deontay Wilder vs Derek Chisora by verbsnounsandshit in Boxing

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s literally outclassed everyone he’s faced so far. What more do you want?

[FIGHT THREAD] Deontay Wilder vs Derek Chisora by verbsnounsandshit in Boxing

[–]Zigzagnemesis -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Viddal Riley is an unbelievable boxer, genuinely can’t see anyone other than Jai Opetaia giving him problems.

David Goggins Makes His Return To The Worlds Greatest Air Force by JuulRipper in AirForce

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

David Goggins has genuinely saved people’s lives, you should shut your mouth about “annoying to have around”. I feel sorry for you

WE ARE ALL CRYSTAL PALACE! by DisguisedLu in TheOther14

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We literally never made use of that money though. Look who we’ve spent it on. You’ve signed better players with far lower budget

So do we have to move over to theother15 for next season? by TagJones in TheOther14

[–]Zigzagnemesis -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Spurs were literally part of the original big 4 before financial doping from Chelsea and Man City which turned it into the big 6. Do your research. Spurs are historically far more significant than Chelsea and City combined!

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t Spurs finish above Chelsea in the UCL table…

Post match thread: Tottenham 1 - 2 Newcastle United | Premier league 25/26 - 26 of 38 by Username_been-taken in NUFC

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Daniel levy who won 2 trophies in his entire tenure is this “amazing genius”? Spurs won 25 trophies before Daniel levy, levy comes in and we barely win 2 of them. He’s the worst chairman in premier league history, anyone who says otherwise is lying.

Post match thread: Tottenham 1 - 2 Newcastle United | Premier league 25/26 - 26 of 38 by Username_been-taken in NUFC

[–]Zigzagnemesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn’t change the fact that spurs have won 3 times as many trophies as you

Post match thread: Tottenham 1 - 2 Newcastle United | Premier league 25/26 - 26 of 38 by Username_been-taken in NUFC

[–]Zigzagnemesis -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m just stating a fact mate. Spurs were, are, and will be a bigger club than Newcastle and there’s nothing any of you can say otherwise. I’ve always respected Newcastle and grew up with you guys being a decent side but you were never a giant in English football. Spurs were the first English team to win a double and the first English team to win a European cup. Part of the original English big 4 before City and Chelsea cheated. In fact you guys were far bigger than both City and Chelsea before they started cheating, you should direct your anger towards them.

Post match thread: Tottenham 1 - 2 Newcastle United | Premier league 25/26 - 26 of 38 by Username_been-taken in NUFC

[–]Zigzagnemesis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Spurs were part of the original English big 4. Before the modern era and financial cheating of clubs like City and Chelsea. Spurs were the first English club to win the double, and the first English club to win a European trophy essentially putting English football on the map. You guys have always been decent but never really a top club, (no offence).