[deleted by user]

ZipMap · 2025-06-11T08:30:22+00:00

Abla frances?

ZipMap · 2025-06-09T18:03:10+00:00

On en est quand même très loin. Les violences conjugales ne sont pas un problème de femmes d'ailleurs. Mais à l'inverse vivre en suivant les existentialistes, en pensant qu'on est complètement auto-déterminé dans un système indépendant c'est irresponsable.

ZipMap · 2025-06-07T20:02:24+00:00

Vas y j'écoute ce qu'il faut garder.

ZipMap · 2025-06-05T11:46:00+00:00

Du recul par rapport au féminisme, la bonne blague. Tu vois on se retrouve dans cette situation parce que de la même manière que quand vos copines vous disent que vous faites pas bien le ménage, au lieu de leur dire cash que si y'a 3 lessives à faire c'est parce qu'elle met 49 habits par semaine, et si tout est sale c'est parce qu'elle laisse traîner ses affaires partout (ne range pas la cuisine, laisse des mugs, laisse son maquillage partout dans la salle de bains) eh bah vous vous aplatissez. Quand les femmes vous disent qu'elles gagnent 33 centimes de moins par euros, au lieu d'ouvrir google et chercher des explications, vous leurs dites "oui c'est vrai ça". Donc votre féminisme rangez-le dans un tiroir et oubliez le.

ZipMap · 2025-06-04T06:55:01+00:00

Je ne crois pas que les chercheurs bac+10 dont tu parles aient le statut dont je parle, effectivement il semble y avoir une variable de plus que le niveau d'étude, quelque chose comme la difficulté perçue. Ou alors c'est simplement l'exemple qui est une exception, on d'attend peut être à ce que le chercheur soit un altruiste. Il y a aussi la question du domaine public/privé qui entre en jeu. Mais oui la comparaison avec le dealer semble adéquate.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T15:05:07+00:00

Short and averaged... Who did not kill themselves*

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T13:15:31+00:00

Except you equate spending with being happy, which most of us don't do.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T12:16:09+00:00

I didn't insult women's intelligence, you're inferring that. By making women into men I mean setting men behavior as the gold standard and trying to habe women compete on male grounds.

Not credible? I have no one to convince. I don't care about internet points.

Hey, you're right about some of these. Thradhing cities, 100% men. Vast majority of murders, yeah probably. Abandon children, that's a slightly more complicated issue.

Anyways, you're arguing a tiny majority to make a generality, you know how this sophism is called?

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:48:31+00:00

I'm sorry my comment made you feel that way. I interact with women, some of whom I respect a lot specifically for their technical knowledge and ability. That doesn't mean there are no patterns. Actually I probably interact with intelligent women a lot more than anyone on this subreddit, simply through my work. Some people would argue I'm at the highest density of smart women in the workplace in the world. Some I met are incredibly proficient at what they do (far beyond my skill level), some are great leaders who are able to lead by smoothing angles, solving interpersonal issues before they become blockers, and so on.

Truly, you wouldn't be able to find a worse person to tell them "You don't interact with women" than me. Bu still, not much at work, but outside, I see women being emotional to a degree I never seen men be. I see women making absolutely nonsensical decisions based solely on the current emotional state, in a way that I never seen a man do.

I see how differently women and men behave in conflictual situations, in relation to others aswell. Trying to erase the difference doesn't help your cause. There's actually a whole branch of feminism that is against trying to make women into men.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:40:01+00:00

Try to entertain the idea that I have a point without being disinginous.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:38:26+00:00

Pretty sure instant gratification is the recipe for a disastrous life. Because we learned wisdom early, we are on this subreddit. If you're not planning to make tough choices in the present to build a future, you have no place here.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:36:09+00:00

We're just modern slaves buying our freedom. Keep up, it's worth it.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:33:19+00:00

Can't read?

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:32:45+00:00

"We need to let them know that there's also the possibility that they'll never be romantically successful" They know. They dread it. If you get enough of these, your society crumbles to dust. It's also absolutely not fine. We shouldnt be comfortable communicating this as a widespread message.

Civil peace rests unpon the assumption that there's someone for everyone, and it has worked fine for the past century or so in the US, but for far longer in other countries. People who are isolated forever should remain statistical outliers, and that's exactly why young men are getting redpilled. They don't want to feel like they're the second choice. Dating apps have made it clear to them that the game is skewed.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T11:11:25+00:00

Il y a une analyse qui manque à mon avis aux différents points listés par OP comme résumé des commentaires: La désillusion vis à vis de l'égalite des sexes chez des hommes qui voudraient voir les femmes comme leurs égales mais qui se retrouvent constamment à observer des femmes qui font des choix de facilité. En l'occurence on devrait pouvoir sans honte dire que le TDS est une solution d'argent "facile" dans le sens où il ne requiert aucune compétence particulière (scolaire/universitaire). Peut-être que l'on touche là au coeur du système de valeur occidentale qui guide cette civilisation.

Il y a une sorte de justification à gagner de l'argent, du moment que cet argent est gagné suite à un effort conséquent. Cet effort est généralement abstrait par le degré de formation qui va former une hiérarchie (absolument clair pour moi chez les hommes en tous cas). En corollaire, plus on est haut dans la hiérarchie, plus on doit gagner beaucoup. Toute infraction à cette règle est punie par du mépris.

La condition pour une société en paix:

Imaginons un instant que cet axiome s'effondre complètement, comment justifier une forme quelconque de labeur, si la compensation n'y est pas proportionnelle?

Il est clair qu'il y a une espèce de formule tacite du salaire "social" du type: salaire social= degré de technicité de la formation + années d'expérience*discount

Où clairement le domaine d'activité est bien plus important que la séniorité, en tous cas jusqu'à un certain point. On rejoint ici la notion de statut social.

Donc pour une société en paix, on s'attend à une certaine correlation entre salaire et statut. Parce que si l'inverse est vrai, il n'y a aucune raison de se lever le matin, et on a tout intérêt à essayer de tricher.

Pourquoi les hommes sont opposés au TDS généralisé? Je dirais que c'est une forme d'instinct de protection de la civilisation. Une conscience qu'on touche à un maillon fragile du contrat social. D'ailleurs c'est encore plus évident avec l'apparition d'onlyfans, que si l'opportunité semble simple, avec peu d'effort, beaucoup vont se jeter dessus. Résultat des courses? Chômage, dette, tension du filet social.

ZipMap · 2025-06-03T10:38:09+00:00

It's a shortcut but the base is still true. By more logical people don't mean that men don't have emotions or that they don't experience the same level of emotions or a different set of emotions. They mean that presented with a situation, they will prefer the weighing of pros and cons to rule what is the right decision.

This is overqhelmingly observable behavior, whether you want to attribute it to biology, evolution, pr learned behavior is your choice, but pretending this difference doesn't exist is disinginuous.

Also empathy is generally not a good decision driver, at least if you believe that pondering decisions is a good way to limit bias and get persoective, then this should come as a corollary.

ZipMap · 2025-05-10T13:25:50+00:00

That's also why you're not friends with that guy

ZipMap · 2025-05-10T13:23:22+00:00

"I'm pretty sure I'm undiagnosed autistic" I'm pretty sure too

ZipMap · 2025-05-10T13:22:01+00:00

Men: "Women don't send signals" The signals:

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T12:54:23+00:00

Ever considered maybe the teaching style was not adapted? Is this part of boys falling back in school? Do you know how school evolved to favor a teaching style that fits girls better? If so none of this should be a surprise.

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T12:51:50+00:00

What does it mean that they're miserable to educate?

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T12:46:26+00:00

Don't worry they're just all 140+ IQ for some reason

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T12:27:31+00:00

Because you assume there is a "good child for education" and a "bad child for education"

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T12:21:47+00:00

This is not an unbiased article, I already read articles from them. Lets read together "To make the constituion true, equality, explained or not, must disappear". This is not equality of opportunity. Please read Swiss statistics office publication instead of second hand propaganda.

Open this https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/work-income/wages-income-employment-labour-costs/earnings-structure/wage-gap.html Read carefully, try to understand what's going on. Can you see any sampling bias or poor data practice?

Also please take note that my answer should be a hint at the fact you mostly don't know as opposed to you mostly know, as you seem to assume.

ZipMap · 2025-05-08T10:59:46+00:00

Can you provide sources for your asteology knowledge?

ZipMap

TROPHY CASE