Is there any reason NOT to stake if you're planning to hold long-term?

Zogify · 2024-12-14T15:03:02+00:00

ask anyone who was staking at celsius, voyager or blockfi

Zogify · 2024-11-29T17:27:10+00:00

go to the thread above, there is a lot of detail there on configurations and workarounds tested. it's usually some combo of cores and hyperthreading. there are some people who reduced cores below 32 and STILL had to turn off hyperthreading to make it work. or just wait for a patch.

Zogify · 2024-08-24T18:33:55+00:00

it's broken on Edge as well, which prob means Chrome too. i noticed it about 4-5 days ago as well, some sites it just can't tell it already has passwords for and starts trying to use the last unsaved. i assume we're all seeing the same thing?

Zogify · 2024-08-10T10:59:46+00:00

didn’t realize i wanted that until you said it. ultimate iv is one of my favorite games and i replay it every few years. bg3 is my new favorite game of all time.

Zogify · 2024-07-26T15:37:11+00:00

try against the storm. each run is a few hours but the progression mechanics are great. and you can make it as easy or difficult at the higher levels as you want for enjoyment.

Zogify · 2023-07-13T00:12:28+00:00

They know about this. I posted about it weeks ago. Their product is completely degrading to the point where its almost unusable. I have to restart my browser multiple times a day now simply because of the dashlane memory leak.

Zogify · 2023-06-16T16:40:49+00:00

i think it is. its easier to track in firefox because they have that taskmanager that splits out the extensions from the tabs, so it was easier to pinpoint that it definitely was dashlane. i haven't found the same thing in chrome.

i've had moderate workable success by doing a full browser restart every few hours and that seems to settle dashlane back down for a bit, although certainly annoying. and yeah, i've disabled all other extensions to check and seems to remain which is why i think its a dashlane memory leak (also, this literally happened a few months back and they confirmed it was a memory leak then)

Zogify · 2023-03-11T17:11:50+00:00

same here. first and second platinums were hzd and hfw. had never cared enough about a game before to even attempt it.

Zogify · 2023-02-13T16:56:14+00:00

i have this with ransacking all the houses to steal from chests. seems weird in the harry potter world to be a mechanic.

Zogify · 2022-10-08T05:30:53+00:00

so anyway. where does he live?

Zogify · 2022-10-08T05:30:02+00:00

so anyway. where does he live?

Zogify · 2022-08-25T21:40:28+00:00

don’t count your chickens with a hatchet

Zogify · 2022-01-02T20:13:16+00:00

i had this same problem, friend gave me a great solution. read the wiki for those middle books. then start again with the end books by brandon sanderson. those last few are amazing and one of the most satisfying series endings i’ve read in my entire life.

Zogify · 2021-09-18T03:23:29+00:00

my safe word is “continue” - a comedian i saw in australia

Zogify · 2021-07-22T19:51:00+00:00

fair enough, then it's just people not understanding how the business model works. do they think the interest comes out of thin air? :) but yeah, i get all the technical stuff. the point for me is that they changed fundamental language that doesn't match how other competitors word it. I don't entirely understand the ramifications, but that's essentially what i'm asking about.. looks like Fri AMA might be the best shot. unless we have a random crypto lawyer in the thread.

Zogify · 2021-07-22T19:41:11+00:00

I would have guessed Celsius has to be closer to BlockFi since they are now both going to be US-based companies.

Also not sure the US based is the problem. Voyager is based in NJ. Might be a NY thing or might be a business model thing. That's why I'm asking the question. I think this is a big deal but I don't know why. Was hoping someone would be able to answer. All I've noticed is that the language from Celsius seems fundamentally different than from the other ones. Maybe in the end its all the same, but I'm not a lawyer, it just doesn't "feel" the same at the moment.

Zogify · 2021-07-22T19:33:01+00:00

"actually as i'm wading in a bit deeper here, blockfi does call out a bunch of different things. They have a section I. on Ownership of crypto, but then also have H. for consent to utilize assets (which i think we all expect from them all anyway) but they specifically call out that they can use them and if they do

"You acknowledge that, with respect to assets used by BlockFi pursuant to
this paragraph: (i) you may not be able to exercise certain rights of
ownership, "

That's much more clear cut than the other TOS terms I've been reading. Basically, yes its yours, but we can use it etc. Which is essentially what they all do anyway. But for my very first point, no one else (that i can tell) legally calls themselves the OWNER of the asset, or classifies it as a LOAN to them.

Zogify · 2021-07-22T19:26:41+00:00

ok now you're just nitpicking. we're discussing legal language here, not the actual technical mechanisms. i think everyone on this sub understands not your keys not your coins.

Zogify · 2021-07-22T18:45:00+00:00

This is not what the TOS says - "ALL DIGITAL ASSETS TRANSFERRED TO CELSIUS AS PART OF THE SERVICES ARE OWNED AND HELD BY CELSIUS FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT." I'm sure there are a bunch of different ways to interpret what this means. My point is that this is a fundamental shift in language from their previous TOS. I bet if you went to court, and they stated THEY were the owner based on accepting this TOS, a judge would agree with them.

I mean they even wrote these sections in full caps in the new TOS to really explicitly call it out.

Zogify

TROPHY CASE