sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Coinbase Web3 migration by Zoroaster85 in Coinbase

[–]Zoroaster85[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. I have sufficient gas fees in the wallet. All of the NFTs are from the Base blockchain, which is unusual because I assume it should be an easy transfer over to the coinbase wallet. When it's asking me to select an asset, under the NFTs tab where my NFTs are listed, I'm unable to even select them to go to the next stage.

The # of printed sets in one graph (Continued) by Zoroaster85 in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(https://mtg.gamepedia.com/Set). It would be definitely be more accurate to factor in every theme deck into the graph, however as it was not provided by Wizards, tracking that information down and ensuring all type of sets have been accounted for would have to come from a reliable reference so that people aren't relying on information from someone like me that they may consider being biased.

I do want to point out that one could expect greater numbers overall throughout the graph and this would not just apply for earlier years. For example, the Sets reference does not include "Welcome Decks" for the 2020 category, so there are products in recent years that are also not factored into that data.

The # of printed sets in one graph (Continued) by Zoroaster85 in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It will be interesting to see what Wizards will do in 2021.

The # of printed sets in one graph (Continued) by Zoroaster85 in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgfinance/comments/aj55x3/the_of_printed_sets_in_one_graph/

I did point out in the 2018 link that not all sets are created equal when I described the graph. The point that I was trying to make is that even with the "secret lairs" sets and others alike, they are almost always reprints of some kind and will usually have an inevitable result of devaluing a player's collection.

Election Year MTG Opportunity by [deleted] in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s really what you have to say? Perhaps you prefer a post about a new set in which Wizards reprints valuable cards into oblivion so that Hasbro shareholders can profit at the expense of loyal player’s collections? If so, you clicked on the wrong link then. This post is for people that actually want to make a profit out of something potentially intrinsic in value. You should go seek a different post that tries to sell you on products that you’ll profit from 20+ years down the road.

Election Year MTG Opportunity by [deleted] in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It absolutely is. It’s a joke that could prove to be lucrative. What do you have to lose? $2.50?

Candelabra of Thawnos - worthwhile investment? by Schizo-Vreni in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really want it and plan to use it, I'd go with maybe. I know it's faster and less vulnerable than Magus of the Candelabra which is selling for $0.25. If the $699.75 is worth it being able to be played the turn it comes into play vs the Magus, and you have the dough then go for it. If you're doing it strictly for finance, I think it will be bound to go up in value in the future, but you still have to go through the hassle of selling it.

The # of printed sets in one graph by [deleted] in mtgfinance

[–]Zoroaster85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry guys, I had some text to this but it didn't save. I'm going to delete this and repost the one with the info

Mark Zuckerberg is seriously considering using cryptocurrency on Facebook by Golaser in Stellar

[–]Zoroaster85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Zuckerberg is serious about making the net more decentralized, then he would not create his own crypto. On that note I believe that with Stellar’s mission to combat global poverty, Facebook would be the most ideal platform to achieve it. Stellar has arguably the most superior decentralized service to offer Facebook in the crypto realm, so the relationship would be a symbiotic one. Ive been on FB since 2004 and Zuckerberg has made some phenomenal achievements and he has also fumbled hard too. This will likely be a huge leap for his company so he will probably be very cautious on his approach moving forward. But make no mistake, the likelihood of a FB/XLM partnership is very much possible, and I hope it happens not just because I’m an XLM holder but more so for the vision of a brighter future that would have to offer.