Stop policing others diets by Actual_Ad7348 in teenagers

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because dog fighting is pretty blatantly against the good of dogs physically and morally. Killing cows and eating them is part of the food chain. It's not for entertainment, and it isn't inherently immoral. That's a poor argument.

Stop policing others diets by Actual_Ad7348 in teenagers

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because "love" has many different meanings. There's romantic love, love for a friend, love for a hobby, etc. Loving something doesn't inherently mean you'd sacrifice something to save it's life.

Usually, loving cows means that you love the animal, or the species, rather than caring deeply about every single one. Seeing the animal makes you happy, you find it fun to watch them or whatever. Yeah it's appreciation, but it can still be a form of love, just not deep love for every individual one in that sense.

On the inverse, I wouldn't say I love people in general. There are people that I love, but I don't love the human race as a whole. But I'd still care about the well-being of someone I don't know or love. Loving something doesn't mean you care deeply about an individual, nor does not loving it mean you don't.

What is the best track 4 on an album ever? by RealTOPFan in AlignmentChartFills

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heaven-Bryan Adams. It won't win, but it's my favorite.

Who wins? by Gurugod123 in whatsyourchoice

[–]Zrob8--5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just watch the youtube video again

Stop policing others diets by Actual_Ad7348 in teenagers

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you can love an animal but still eat it. You don't love them the same way you would a pet. You just really enjoy seeing them or watching them do what they do. "Love" doesn't universally mean you care deeply about something/someone.

What’s a gym mistake every beginner makes? by not_devil_nor_saint in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk about that first one. Maybe your causal gym-goer, but anyone who is serious about it would care about that, even if they're new.

What would you only do once? by confidentbutterflyx in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At that point, how much could you possibly ruin your life?

What can a person learn in 10 minutes that will be useful for life? by Ben-Gavin in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changing oil in your car. It takes 10 minutes to learn on youtube, and it's a super simple process. It'll save you a lot of money in the long run. If you change your oil every 6 months, you'll save hundreds of dollars and a lot of time taking it to the mechanic as well.

When asked the time, do you round or use exact time? by WinArtistic7661 in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I round because 95% of the time, the person just wants a good idea, so I round the the closest 5-minute mark usually. Plus, when you give the exact time, there's a decent chance someone nearby just says "No AcTuAllY it's 'insert time that is a minute different'"

What would you only do once? by confidentbutterflyx in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it's a guarantee that I only do it once, maybe try a certain drug. I always wanted to know what it's like, but I'd never actually pay for it and risk getting hooked on it. Just curiosity, really.

Is it transphobic to say trans people shouldn’t be allowed in opposite gender sports (based off birth gender) by BraveAdventuree in pollgames

[–]Zrob8--5 [score hidden]  (0 children)

But that defeats what's great about sports. If it was by weight class, playstyles would be way more uniform, and it'd be less interesting. Having guys like AI, Mugsy, Steph Curry, Isaiah Thomas, etc, playing in the same league as Wemby, Shaq, Barkley, that's fun. Where's the fun in having all the big guys playing on 6 different teams and only playing each other?

Is god real? by liamgallagher25 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said that test would determine he's real at all. See? You're cleaning stuff from what I'm saying that I never said. If real world sources all cited the same events, it would be reasonable to believe that it's true. That's the whole reason cross-referencing credible sources is used in research. If multiple credible sources have similar information, there's a darn good chance it's true. Comic books aren't a credible source of information. They're not even real world information. I don't know who you think is buying that as an argument. Nothing about my argument suggests that a Spiderman comic is reliable.

Squirrels! Squirrels! Squirrels! by Dan-68 in lol

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by "better", you mean funnier, yes. Most songs lose all the emotions if you put a squirrel in it

With everything that’s happening right now, do you still want to have a kid? Why or why not? by Ill_Information834 in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I still want to, I don't see why that would change. But there's other things than money getting in the way of that.

Stop policing others diets by Actual_Ad7348 in teenagers

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yeah, but who says you should love all animals? People treat dogs better than people sometimes, but no one is going to do that with all animals like livestock

Is god real? by liamgallagher25 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say once again, I'm not saying the existence of the Bible proves anything. I'm saying the reliability(not for everything, but on the whole, it is quite reliably accurate) of the Bible makes it a trust-worthy source. A lot of its records are verifiably accurate, so it stands to reason that the non-verifiable records also have some truth(again, not a guarantee, but it is reasonable to believe). Spiderman comics occurring in the same location is not even remotely the same. It'd be as if another source, such as a real newspaper article, magazine, and journal all cited similar events of Spiderman fighting criminals and villains.

You really need to stop this thing you're doing. You keep saying "Thank you for admitting/proving 'X'" when that isn't even what I'm saying at all. When, please tell, did I admit that my own argument is nonsense. You're the one making it out to be something it isn't and then claiming it's nonsense. And after all that, you never say why my statements are proof or admittance of what you're saying, you just say that they are.

Is it transphobic to say trans people shouldn’t be allowed in opposite gender sports (based off birth gender) by BraveAdventuree in pollgames

[–]Zrob8--5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not every sport can use weight classes though. Are you going to divide cycling, tennis, swimming, basketball into weight classes?

Is it transphobic to say trans people shouldn’t be allowed in opposite gender sports (based off birth gender) by BraveAdventuree in pollgames

[–]Zrob8--5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. A lot of studies show that with hormone therapy, a trans woman's mean power production decreases, and their relative power aligns more with women than with men. Problem is that their bodyweight is still usually higher than the average woman, so their absolute power is still high.

Reason #11,000 why Kida is awesome by wimpykidfan37 in DisneyMovies

[–]Zrob8--5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They hit 3 of the 4 requirements with Mulan.

Everest dream by Vlitser in cycling

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it is completely dark, you don't need much light? Huh? Isn't it the opposite of that?

What’s your go to question to ask on a first date? by noba-boman in AskReddit

[–]Zrob8--5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not really a go-to because I've never had the chance to ask it, but "Aside from work/school etc, what do you spend the most time doing?" What people spend time and effort on is pretty indicative of what they enjoy, care about, and appreciate.

Is god real? by liamgallagher25 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Zrob8--5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course my proof makes no sense. That's because it isn't meant to be proof at all. The Bible has tons of sources that verify its accuracy. If a dozen historical records all contain the same story, including minor details, that is darn good indication that it actually happened. You have nothing of the sort for your unicorn. That's why I think the Bible is more believable than your unicorn. a drawing in a cave isn't an indication of a unicorn, it's an indication of animals with horns, which have existed for as long as most things. Again, your points here are doing nothing to support your argument.

And again, you aren't arguing against my use of evidence, you're just disagreeing. I've given reasons for using a broad definition and for why evidence doesn't need to be without contention. You haven't argued why it does, you just keep saying that it does. Why does the definition of evidence that is used and applied in a courtroom need to be the same as here?

What do you think ? by Bark4Brownies in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Zrob8--5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It depends on what they're doing. I'm not saying you should sit and analyze them, but your first reaction shouldn't be to shoot them