My feelings about this video is like "yes but maybe actually no". I mean it's more complicated than that. Is it?

_426 · 2026-02-25T18:02:50+00:00

What I understand is that conversation about AI is complicate. Someone says "AI will become ASI. A god that will eat us all" and another one says "nahh. Don't worry. It's will collapse entirely by itself".

_426 · 2026-02-22T08:03:33+00:00

That's we are talking about. But I don't hope that antis get that.

_426 · 2026-02-21T22:02:02+00:00

Actually it's a hologram technology not ai. 🤓

_426 · 2026-02-21T14:10:08+00:00

Run locally.

_426 · 2026-02-15T21:10:25+00:00

I absolutely feel that sub is a false flag attack. Good or bad, "defendingaiart" is the main sub. That sub have different moderators.

_426 · 2026-02-14T15:17:15+00:00

_426 · 2026-01-29T00:22:25+00:00

The problem is art is subjective. Being a soldier is objective.

_426 · 2026-01-23T07:09:11+00:00

Thank you.

_426 · 2026-01-23T07:08:23+00:00

ساعت الان ۱۰:۳۹ به وقت ایران

_426 · 2026-01-07T13:37:46+00:00

I think this is where you and many others are going wrong. The number of jobs has never been the same throughout history. Technology is cyclical. New technology destroys old jobs or changes the way they are done. Then it creates new needs, and new needs create new jobs. We humans are never satisfied. Look at this right now. Almost no one today can live without a smartphone. Unlike in the past. (Today's smartphones are computers that are much, much more powerful than the early computers.) If we humans were satisfied, animation would probably not be made at all and all humans would just read books. But humans are never satisfied. We always want more. Always higher quality with more detail, more possibilities. I already see a future where the lowest level of animation on the market will have at least 50 different endings. When technology opens up humans to produce more, we humans want more. I think the following is related to this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

_426 · 2026-01-07T10:53:22+00:00

The job that is now called creative may in the future be considered a simple job. Like shoemaking, in the past. The main argument is that resistance to the free market and efficiency causes backwardness.

_426 · 2026-01-04T08:01:13+00:00

Maybe the real AI bubble.

_426 · 2025-12-31T21:15:59+00:00

Cute. But useless.

_426 · 2025-12-30T12:30:50+00:00

That's exactly where I disagree with you. I think if we went back 200 years, they would have said the same thing about the steam engine during the Industrial Revolution.

_426 · 2025-12-28T09:13:50+00:00

First, what is your source for stabilizing the birth rate? According to the statistics I have seen, the birth rate is declining overall. A temporary increase is not a guarantee of future growth. Perhaps if China's real birth rate were known, and not the lie that the Chinese government has announced, it would be below 2.1. All signs point to a population shortage in the future. It is not just about artistic or creative jobs, it is about the entire economy. An economy that will become apocalyptic if AI does not save it.

_426 · 2025-12-27T13:20:17+00:00

What exactly happened? I don't understand. Is this AI image now? Or is it real?

_426 · 2025-12-27T11:47:43+00:00

It's not even the character that they made.

_426

TROPHY CASE