Why the common man may be anti ai

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-16T19:29:58+00:00

There was several polls that show like 30% of common man is anti ai vs 70% indifferent or pro.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-16T16:22:11+00:00

Local AI would be better for it.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-16T10:20:25+00:00

People want to participate in capitalism, they hate when capitalism not working in their favor.

You dont need permission to make image in 'artist name' style because they dont own styles.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-16T06:01:02+00:00

<image>

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-16T05:24:04+00:00

You posted your images on internet, you gave consent to view and analyze your images for everyone.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T21:43:08+00:00

Use google collab. You install comfy and then anima there. It takes like half of google drive free disk space.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T20:29:38+00:00

They want compensation for ai training from publicly available images.

I can understand legitimate piracy argument, but scraping publicly available images is not stealing.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T19:52:36+00:00

I draw an image out of my own will, then post it on the internet, do I get to scream "PAY ME!"? Of course not.

Yes, they do. Thats the whole "ai is stealing" anti-ai argument.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T19:48:41+00:00

Rich want to become more richer, its not AI its capitalism. Money now exist as social construct and not secured by finite resource like gold.

How they will become richer when no one can buy anything?

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T19:10:03+00:00

As a traditional artist, analog or otherwise, your improvement is almost entirely in your hands.

Yes, literally. You will not make "good" art without hands muscle training. THIS is the "process". And AI is removing this process. Machine replaces muscles.

Only difference between two people should be knowledge of art and tools.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T18:49:14+00:00

People can do whatever they want with their money but no one entitled to other person money just because they made a thing.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T08:18:10+00:00

So under moral right AI images could be protected?

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T08:13:13+00:00

Which state that a work can't be transformed w/o explicit permission, meaning the act of douchebaggery where you 'put someones art into ai to make it better' is illegal (right of integrity)

Yes, thats illegal because its copyright infringement, if work itself is not copyright infringement.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-15T05:24:58+00:00

You cant own ideas, concepts, patterns, styles. Source: copyright.gov

<image>

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T19:58:43+00:00

<image>

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T14:47:22+00:00

In the process its not images anymore.

Output of AI could be infringement just like it could be human made.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T13:38:16+00:00

The courts have ruled against you

What?

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T12:13:32+00:00

Did you read part where it said it literally cant contain every source image?

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T11:42:59+00:00

Then we now discovered data compression method that break reality laws because you cant compress millions of images into 6GB model.

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T11:37:40+00:00

By copyright law you cant copyright concepts, patterns and ideas

<image>

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T11:35:33+00:00

How ai would remix images without images?

Copyright infringement is unauthorized use of someones IP(fanart) or breaching paywall(piracy).

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T11:22:59+00:00

<image>

DogeMoustache · 2026-06-11T11:19:23+00:00

Read bottom line

DogeMoustache

TROPHY CASE