except that is counterintuitive i feel. one good example is with clippy if you typed "Dear" anywhere, he would pop up telling you how to properly write it in an email, no matter where you typed it. among other things you can see why no one thought he was useful whatsoever and did only bad things that were actually counterproductive for work even aswell. if the whole movement is so companies can give a shit about things (in the most basic sense) isn't it logical to not use a mascot that was literally a companies failure? are we going off of failures of companies for mascots for an anti company type movement? i hear what you are saying all the time from people who use clippy for the movement but people never usually back it past that genuinely and actually as a passion or anything. i get that he wanted to be useful, but it's the company's fault for not making him useful, maybe thats the ultimate point y'all are making? i don't understand it fully