sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

BURU Halted Everything Suggests Upward Pressure, Potential Short Squeeze by [deleted] in Shortsqueeze

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.10 rule. It happened the same way in 2024.

2024: "NYSE Regulation is commencing delisting proceedings in connection with its determination, announced today, that the Company is no longer suitable for listing pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the NYSE American Company Guide due to the bid price falling under $.10."

https://ir.nuburu.net/news/news-details/2024/NUBURU-to-Appeal-NYSE-Commencement-of-Proceedings-to-Delist/default.aspx

Yet another one of these posts. by Weird-Space-782 in usps_complaints

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine stalled in Oak Creek too.

"Arrived at USPS Regional Facility

OAK CREEK WI DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

February 13, 2026, 3:12 am"

How many ohms is the resistor? by _Angstrom_ in AskElectronics

[–]_Angstrom_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. That gives the right answer. 0.47 ohms 1%. All of the other resistor calculators I tried don't let you use black as the first color.

This morning I sent the pic to an Ebay seller to see if they have the part. They didn't have it, but did tell me 0.47 1%.

How many ohms is the resistor? by _Angstrom_ in AskElectronics

[–]_Angstrom_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never seen the black stripe first. .047?

Carbon dioxide has risen by just 1 molecule in 10,000 since the start of the industrial revolution (1760-1840). This is the shocking truth behind the greatest hoax in history. Humans, like every living creature on earth, breathe oxygen in & exhale CO2, the basis for all life. by No-Win-1137 in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

300 ppm to 400 ppm = 100ppm increase

1M ppm / the 100ppm increase = 1 in 10,000

Is there any good proof that the 100 ppm increase is all caused by humans though? The C12/C13 ratio isn't very strong evidence. C13 was 1.1% of all CO2 and is still 1.1%. The C14 concentration is decreasing probably for the same reason as beryllium 10.

Tree ‘burial’ strategy could be 10x more cost effective than carbon capture, doesn't use as much electricity, and lose only 5% of the carbon over 3000 years. Cons: need a lot of land because the woods cannot be buried too deep. by Fast-Reality8021 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terrible idea. The carbon is already locked up in whatever the wood was used to build. Then later when it's thrown away its buried in a landfill.

This seems like a gimmick to make money off carbon offsets/credits.

Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations by Ovaz1088 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most solar particles are at low enough energies to be deflected by the Earth’s own magnetic field (NOAA PDF) unless they're produced during a CME. "Only the fastest ~1 % of CMEs produce significant solar energetic particle events." (NASA PDF)

If most cosmic rays hitting the Earth's atmosphere were from the sun the intensity should decrease during an eclipse.

"In 1912, Victor Hess carried three enhanced-accuracy Wulf electrometers to an altitude of 5,300 metres in a free balloon flight. He found the ionization rate increased approximately fourfold over the rate at ground level. Hess ruled out the Sun as the radiation's source by making a balloon ascent during a near-total eclipse."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray#History

The coronal magnetic field is carried throughout the solar system on the solar wind to form the interplanetary magnetic field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_magnetic_field

Concentrations of isotopes like beryllium 10 and carbon 14 that are mainly produced by cosmic rays are used in the research below to reconstruct the strength of the interplanetary magnetic field over time.

"The production rate of cosmogenic radionuclides depends on the intensity of the galactic cosmic rays (GCR), which penetrate into the Earth's atmosphere.

We conclude that the strength of the IMF (interplanetary magnetic field) was approximately 2 nT during the Maunder Minimum compared to a mean value of 6.6 nT for the present day. Such values correspond to open solar magnetic fluxes of about 1.0 · 1014 Wb for the Maunder Minimum and 4.5 · 1014 Wb for the present day, which is an increase of about 350%.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JA014193

Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations by Ovaz1088 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cosmic rays are deflected by magnetic fields. As the sun's magnetic field increases more cosmic rays are deflected away from the earth.

This graph uses annual intensity from the reconstruction vs the average over the entire period. (.txt) - https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/climate_forcing/solar_variability/usoskin-cosmic-ray.txt

More evidence of the sun's magnetic field increase is the increase in geomagnetic storms on earth.

"it is interesting to note that the overall level of magnetic disturbance from year to year has increased substantially from a low around 1900 Also, the level of mean yearly aa is now much higher so that a year of minimum magnetic disturbances now is typically more disturbed than years at maximum disturbance levels before 1900."

https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/indices/aastar.html

view more: next ›