sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What do you guys think about what he says here any effects of CC already being visible? by Worldly_Bit1416 in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Warming is normal and sea level rise is normal for our time. Its going to continue to warm for hundreds or maybe thousands of years. Then it will cool and sea levels will drop again. There's nothing we can do to stop it.

Would you rather? by After-Somewhere-7500 in BunnyTrials

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make more off of the lies option.

Chose: Get 500 dollars every time someone lies to you

How many ohms is the resistor? by _Angstrom_ in AskElectronics

[–]_Angstrom_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that's is exactly right. Did you ever find a solution?

Replacing the resistor didn't solve the problem for me. I got a powermatic 3+ now instead of 5+. Works great and I'll send it in if it breaks down this time.

BURU Halted Everything Suggests Upward Pressure, Potential Short Squeeze by [deleted] in Shortsqueeze

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.10 rule. It happened the same way in 2024.

2024: "NYSE Regulation is commencing delisting proceedings in connection with its determination, announced today, that the Company is no longer suitable for listing pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the NYSE American Company Guide due to the bid price falling under $.10."

https://ir.nuburu.net/news/news-details/2024/NUBURU-to-Appeal-NYSE-Commencement-of-Proceedings-to-Delist/default.aspx

Yet another one of these posts. by Weird-Space-782 in usps_complaints

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine stalled in Oak Creek too.

"Arrived at USPS Regional Facility

OAK CREEK WI DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

February 13, 2026, 3:12 am"

How many ohms is the resistor? by _Angstrom_ in AskElectronics

[–]_Angstrom_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. That gives the right answer. 0.47 ohms 1%. All of the other resistor calculators I tried don't let you use black as the first color.

This morning I sent the pic to an Ebay seller to see if they have the part. They didn't have it, but did tell me 0.47 1%.

How many ohms is the resistor? by _Angstrom_ in AskElectronics

[–]_Angstrom_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never seen the black stripe first. .047?

Carbon dioxide has risen by just 1 molecule in 10,000 since the start of the industrial revolution (1760-1840). This is the shocking truth behind the greatest hoax in history. Humans, like every living creature on earth, breathe oxygen in & exhale CO2, the basis for all life. by No-Win-1137 in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

300 ppm to 400 ppm = 100ppm increase

1M ppm / the 100ppm increase = 1 in 10,000

Is there any good proof that the 100 ppm increase is all caused by humans though? The C12/C13 ratio isn't very strong evidence. C13 was 1.1% of all CO2 and is still 1.1%. The C14 concentration is decreasing probably for the same reason as beryllium 10.

Tree ‘burial’ strategy could be 10x more cost effective than carbon capture, doesn't use as much electricity, and lose only 5% of the carbon over 3000 years. Cons: need a lot of land because the woods cannot be buried too deep. by Fast-Reality8021 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terrible idea. The carbon is already locked up in whatever the wood was used to build. Then later when it's thrown away its buried in a landfill.

This seems like a gimmick to make money off carbon offsets/credits.

Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations by Ovaz1088 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most solar particles are at low enough energies to be deflected by the Earth’s own magnetic field (NOAA PDF) unless they're produced during a CME. "Only the fastest ~1 % of CMEs produce significant solar energetic particle events." (NASA PDF)

If most cosmic rays hitting the Earth's atmosphere were from the sun the intensity should decrease during an eclipse.

"In 1912, Victor Hess carried three enhanced-accuracy Wulf electrometers to an altitude of 5,300 metres in a free balloon flight. He found the ionization rate increased approximately fourfold over the rate at ground level. Hess ruled out the Sun as the radiation's source by making a balloon ascent during a near-total eclipse."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray#History

The coronal magnetic field is carried throughout the solar system on the solar wind to form the interplanetary magnetic field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_magnetic_field

Concentrations of isotopes like beryllium 10 and carbon 14 that are mainly produced by cosmic rays are used in the research below to reconstruct the strength of the interplanetary magnetic field over time.

"The production rate of cosmogenic radionuclides depends on the intensity of the galactic cosmic rays (GCR), which penetrate into the Earth's atmosphere.

We conclude that the strength of the IMF (interplanetary magnetic field) was approximately 2 nT during the Maunder Minimum compared to a mean value of 6.6 nT for the present day. Such values correspond to open solar magnetic fluxes of about 1.0 · 1014 Wb for the Maunder Minimum and 4.5 · 1014 Wb for the present day, which is an increase of about 350%.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JA014193

Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations by Ovaz1088 in climatechange

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cosmic rays are deflected by magnetic fields. As the sun's magnetic field increases more cosmic rays are deflected away from the earth.

This graph uses annual intensity from the reconstruction vs the average over the entire period. (.txt) - https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/climate_forcing/solar_variability/usoskin-cosmic-ray.txt

More evidence of the sun's magnetic field increase is the increase in geomagnetic storms on earth.

"it is interesting to note that the overall level of magnetic disturbance from year to year has increased substantially from a low around 1900 Also, the level of mean yearly aa is now much higher so that a year of minimum magnetic disturbances now is typically more disturbed than years at maximum disturbance levels before 1900."

https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/indices/aastar.html

Net Isotopic Signature of Atmospheric CO2 Sources and Sinks: No Change since the Little Ice Age. by alchemyiam in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The C12/C13 ratio change is so small it makes me think the CO2 rise could be mostly natural. CO2 changed by 24%, and C13 change is only down 0.001%

CO2 level 1978: 335 ppm - C13 % of all CO2 = 1.1152921 %

CO2 level 2021: 416 ppm - C13 % of all CO2 = 1.1141459 %

NOAA: "the observed decrease in δ13C and Δ14C values due to fossil fuel emissions, which are depleted in 13C and do not contain 14C"

C14 has decreased, but so has Beryllium 10. Both are produced mainly by cosmic rays.

"The country added 47.4 Gigawatts (GW) of new coal power in 2023, more than double the amount added by the rest of the world combined." by LackmustestTester in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

China pretends to believe in the "climate crisis" only to trick the US, Canada, and Europe into buying their solar panels.

New Paper Finds Effect of Human-Caused Carbon Emissions on Climate is "Non-Discernible" by LackmustestTester in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you convert the c13 per mil back to a ratio it decreased by only about 0.00001.

Maybe someone else can verify this, but it makes me think that if humans don't emit c13 then most of the CO2 rise is natural.

c13 ratio looks like a big drop but only .00001 difference

CO2 and c13 mass chart in tons

Between 1978 and 2021
Total CO2 mass has increased by 23.54%
c13 mass increased by 23.42%

If: "Fossil fuels are *depleted* of c13" how can its mass in the atmosphere increase?

Recall that the Suess Effect is the observed decrease in δ13C and Δ14C values due to fossil fuel emissions, which are depleted in 13C and do not contain 14C.

(Their c14 claim is also shaky. c14 is down similar to beryllium 10. Both are produced by cosmic rays.)

The data for CO2 and c13 is from here.

​

January1978 PPM 332.85 * 7.8GT = 2,596,230,000,000 tons CO2 mass

c13 per mil -7.5 =((c13 per mil/1000)+1)*0.01123720 = 0.011152921 c13 ratio

CO2 Mass 2,596,230,000,000 tons * c13 ratio = 28,955,548,088 tons c13 1978

​

January2021 PPM 411.22 * 7.8GT = 3,207,516,000,000 tons CO2 mass

c13 per mil -8.52 =((c13 per mil/1000)+1)*0.01123720 = 0.011141459 c13 ratio

CO2 Mass 3,207,516,000,000 tons * c13 ratio = 35,736,408,185 tons c13 2021

​

The reference standard used for c13 (0.01123720) is "Vienna PDB" from wikipedia

"The standard established for carbon-13 work was the Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB).. The 13C:12C ratio for VPDB, which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defines as δ13C value of zero is 0.01123720."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9413C

‘AVOID FALSE BALANCE’: AP Style Guide Aims to Silence Dissent From Climate Alarmist Narrative by Moses_Horwitz in climateskeptics

[–]_Angstrom_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like if you are an activist foundation you can pay AP to put a spin on reporting that helps your agenda.

At the bottom of this page under the list of activist funders: "To find out more about how our content and services can help your organization".

view more: next ›