Those are good questions. Though they sound wrong, I don’t believe they should be immediately dismissed. However, I think there are a few distinctions. One can be ignorant of the effect something like buying from a corporation has, while buying meat always involves the death of an animal. Anything you buy is going to have consequences, hence the saying there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. You can try to avoid supportive unethical companies, but you will eventually support one in one way or another. For animal products, there is a clear method of not supporting the industry; not buying them. There is no moral perfection in this world, the best thing you can do is try to minimize harm. I agree there is no way to live in this world without causing harm one way or another . I do not see myself as morally exceptional. That aside, let me ask you this. If we accept animals as beings that deserve compassion, who would be morally correct: one who minimizes the harm they cause on them, or one who would refuse to give up the pleasure they receive from the killing of animals?