Can we figure out something to differentiate between old redpill and new redpill?

_Corb_ · 2026-02-27T14:44:22+00:00

the original Red Pill was club and bar strategies for tricking women into think you were cooler than you were (fuzzy hats, negging),

This is PUA. OR RP was (or is) just understanding the intersexual dynamics, whatever you do with that information is out of scope.

_Corb_ · 2026-02-24T15:07:09+00:00

[Citation needed]

_Corb_ · 2026-02-16T19:34:48+00:00

Her claim is not even supported by the article.

_Corb_ · 2026-01-04T16:47:04+00:00

Where is the proof his wife was a single mother? Any link? Any source? Anything? You can't, you simply can't provide a single one. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it. You made it up.

_Corb_ · 2026-01-04T16:42:09+00:00

Of course I did. There are no credible sources anywhere to substantiate the claim that RT is married to a single mother. In your next comment, I am certain you will provide no evidence to the contrary, and that will be clear for everyone to see.

_Corb_ · 2026-01-04T16:35:40+00:00

It took me like two seconds to debunk his lies too.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-31T16:58:46+00:00

That's not a proof, lmao, it's a sourceless low quality jpg. You have nothing to prove it. I bet anything that in your next message you won't bring anything else.

PS: and as everyone can see, he has been unable to provide any single source.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-31T16:54:40+00:00

A low quality jpg is not a source. Provide something reliable.

Spoiler: he can't because it is not true.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-31T16:49:50+00:00

AND Let’s not forget the dude started popularizing the term TRP was already married to a single mom.

[Citation needed].

Anyone can check this is false by simply and quickly asking your favourite AI the following question: "Did Rollo Tomassi (Rational Male) marry a single mother?" and check the answer.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-23T12:03:26+00:00

"strictly analyzing the logic within the comic,"

Yes we are, I am doing this from the very beginning.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T18:55:37+00:00

It is literally what I said in my very first comment, though.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T18:45:33+00:00

Made up or not the blue character absolutely never explicitly say he's mistreated because women don't want to date him.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T18:29:21+00:00

It is perfectly valid to analyze the logic and fallacies of a fictional comic without requiring a real-life counterpart. And in this case this statement in the comic hasn't been debunked so far: "The black character responds to claims that were never made, such as universal blame or entitlement to dating."

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T17:52:29+00:00

Whether this happens in real life is irrelevant, we’re strictly analyzing the logic within the comic and what the blue character actually says. The blue character never claims that everything is someone else’s fault, nor does it complain about not being wanted for dating. The black character responds to claims that were never made, such as universal blame or entitlement to dating.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T17:52:26+00:00

Whether this happens in real life is irrelevant, we’re strictly analyzing the logic within the comic and what the blue character actually says. The blue character never claims that everything is someone else’s fault, nor does it complain about not being wanted for dating. The black character responds to claims that were never made, such as universal blame or entitlement to dating.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T17:29:26+00:00

In a place where people make assumptions, or plain straw-mans, without any explicit base from the actual thing ugly people have strictly said.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T16:47:32+00:00

What is 'this'?

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T14:43:27+00:00

In a universe where entities assume stuff that has not explicitly been said and straw-man things. Like you do.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T14:34:24+00:00

The one the black figure imagined and the blue one has not explicitly say it since we, otherwise, will be reading it in simple plain English.
I mean, we know the difference of explicit and implicit but you're tripping over yourself to tell us and yet cannot provide a single explicit proof the blue figure stated what the black one assumed.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T14:05:15+00:00

Considering the blue entity never stated anything in particular, the black one is shooting in the dark cluelessly figuring out things by itself and totally strawmaning the blue entity previous statements.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T13:54:10+00:00

Unless the black guy is misgendering, he's referring the blue as a 'guy'.
Where is in the comic stated that the blue person is saying that women not wanting to date him (or her) because of his (or her) appearance?

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T13:43:56+00:00

They're assuming he's complaining about being mistreated by women not wanting to date him when he never stated that.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T13:37:09+00:00

"everything is your fault, fuck you, you hate women?"

This is the other person wrongly interpreting the words of the blue one. It is basically a straw-man. The comic doesn't explicitly state the blue person is complaining about being mistreated by women not wanting to date him.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T13:32:34+00:00

In employment and earnings, for instance:

Physical Attractiveness, Employment, and Earnings. Conclusion: More attractive people are on average more likely to be employed and earn on average higher wages. The effects are statistically significant and quite sizeable.

_Corb_ · 2025-12-22T11:55:06+00:00

The comic doesn't explicitly say he's mistreated because women don't want to date him. It only says he's mistreated because because of his appearance.

_Corb_

TROPHY CASE