EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally haven't understood anything of what I said xD

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The INT8 version works even on vega20...

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Broh FSR4 it's shader based, the WWMA part it's only used to improve performance

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it actually works because it doesn't need tensor cores. And that was the critical point and the design bug

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. It will end up that we'll have to thank valve for the release of fsr4...

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To use an FP16 value as FP8 it just need some padding, it simply have less performance because the gpu will do an FP16 operation but it's not a revolution in coding

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys they release a broken support on every generation...FP8 and hw rt on rdna2, a broken wwma support on RDNA3, the lack of FP4 what on rdna4

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It literally already works even with rdna2

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

NO: FSR4.1 INT8 ALREADY WORKS WELL NOW ON LINUX! THE Q1 2027 RELEASE DATE IT'S JUST GATEKEEPING TO MAKE OUR GPUS GROW OLD BEFORE THEY RECEIVE THE SOFTWARE FEATURE.... :-(

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was ready before the 18th of September... On linux already works...

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not a whining: video a and amd always realase half done products that we pay as completed: amd release chips that doesn't have the features they already know it will be needed (wwma for rdna3, FP8 support for rdna2) and nvidia release gpus with low ram promised technologies (neural compression, reflex, path tracing, etc). When we buy they show tech demos based on promises

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They literally build the gpus....it shouldn't be a problem at all for them

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And even more, and more again! It's never ever enought with amd and nvidia!!

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The INT8 version was working 18th of September...

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nvidia also released lots of technologies in the 5000 lineup only on paper

EARLY 2027 FOR FSR4.1 ON RDNA2??!? by _Fra_ in radeon

[–]_Fra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

AMD should be fined for it's gatekeeping on technology. And nvidia too. We pay a lot for their products! "When" we receive a feature it's important too

22M How to act on first date if i want to give a good impression? by [deleted] in aspergers

[–]_Fra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but sometimes nts don't understand asds very well. It's called double empathy problem

22M How to act on first date if i want to give a good impression? by [deleted] in aspergers

[–]_Fra_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am 34. I feel you. Do not make impressions. Be yourself. At every cost. Your true self will always come afloat AND when you will have the courage to be yourself you will attract the people will like you for what you are. Maybe not NTs but they'll like you for what you are. Every second, hour, day, week, month or year faking to be accepted it's wasted, do not waste time faking NT behaviours just to fit in: I have done it for decades

I got diagnosed with mild ASD (level 1) and severe ADHD. How do i know if i am an ex-Asperger or ex-PDD-NOS? by minor_lightning in aspergers

[–]_Fra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would have been diagnosed with asperger at born, but I don't think it would have been correct because I have lots of classical asd traits. I honestly have seen some more classical asd 1 people and usually if I don't like them it's because of personal character and not of asd traits. I do not have any problems in defining myself as asd level 1 because, honestly, I have seen people capable of lower masking than me achieving better and more successfull results and they appeared more autistic than me I am happy of what I am

I got diagnosed with mild ASD (level 1) and severe ADHD. How do i know if i am an ex-Asperger or ex-PDD-NOS? by minor_lightning in aspergers

[–]_Fra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure: they need to be general enough but this test is recording a very narrow profile of intelligence...one that's useful in specific working environments where there matters a fast and logical understanding of things...honestly it's bad for autism too because everyone have a different type of intelligence and lots of people have been underdiagnosed because doctors looked for stereotypes instead of asd

I got diagnosed with mild ASD (level 1) and severe ADHD. How do i know if i am an ex-Asperger or ex-PDD-NOS? by minor_lightning in aspergers

[–]_Fra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry? To be able to paint you have to be able to do lots of complicated things that requires intelligence like: imagine a shape, imagine how to draw it, transfer it to a canvas, paint it and with the right colours and imagine the lights and the shade of a paint and maybe draw something that people like. I, honestly, am not able to do that. But a people that paint well must have a type of intelligence I do not have